Topic: Bitcoin is the ultimate shitcoin for having a useless mining algorithm. (Read 213 times)

They should revoke your PhD, Sir. Your rants are pathetic and you're like a broken record.
Please, come up with something new from time to time.

How's your nebula shitcoin doing?


You've become quite bitter after the community refused to "flock to your project."
Let's face it, you've failed at crypto. Try something else. I heard origami is relaxing, or you could try sudoku...

Don't do it. Spare us your brain fart.


Nothing like starting a thread with an insult and hoping to start a conversation? Unless you just want to insult us and there's no other purpose of this thread, in which case you're doing a good job. Keep it up and I hope mods will eventually kick you out of here for wasting our time.


Ph. D. of what? Theology, like Craig?

It becomes more exciting when someone challenges the Bitcoin either challenged by any other platform that comes with their own utility token or coin or challenged by people like you. I do not know what to say, because I am a student and you are a Ph.D. holder which means you have more knowledge and experience.

But according to my knowledge, BTC is not made for advanced sciences, instead, it was made for a decentralized p2p payment system. I personally have not read the whole Whitepaper yet, and some things are blurry for now.

But as far as I know, BTC is not only made for the sciences or advanced sciences. If you think the BTC blockchain has no use case in the advanced sciences then I won't mind it, and I will not talk badly about it, because it is not a rocket made to land on the Moon, it is a car. How can you expect from a car to land on the moon?

Maybe when some new updates or modifications in the network come and you implement wings and rocket to the car then you might take the work of landing from it. But till then leave the BTC out of it. And if you have a better solution or anything to propose then you should come with that first.

ikr, it's like someone commenting on the food of one of the famous chefs and criticizing how he cooks and it shouldn't be like that, while he himself doesn't even know how to cook rice.

criticizing someone should be done with concrete actions, for example launching your own token which has good features compared to what satoshi offers. if it's just empty comments like this, what's the difference between him and the crazy people raving on the street?

There are people in our society who can't accept reality. I am not shocked to see this kind of title from the OP. If Bitcoin is a shitcoin due to having a mining algorithm then it is going to be the biggest bubble the modern era is going to see. I can see OP has a lack of knowledge about bitcoin technology and I suggest he explore this forum to gain more knowledge about bitcoin so that we can discuss your observations about bitcoin again.

Guys show some respect for the forum scientist, circcash is the most advanced mining algorithm in the universe and beyond, you can even go inside a black hole and live to tell the story by using circcash, the only problem is that it only works on earth 578, in this universe is just a dead useless garbage. It's so dead that not even OP has ever bought a single unit.😉

---

Since OP adds no value to this community as his posts are a clear evidence to this claim, I guess it would be best to ban him.

Hey my friend, please just shut the f@#& up, that you did or studied science in school does not mean that every thing in life should all be based on science, or scientifically backed.

There's still life outside science and  I think you should get this into your f@$% head and not just understand it, but also respect it' for its a fact.

That you have eaten and your stomach is filled up, does not mean that every body's stomach is also filled, you being a scientist does not mean that everything in life resolves or should resolve around science, you are a big joke if this is the type of mindset you have.

Scientific mining algorithm got me rolling on the ground, are you Satoshi's cousin?  Do you and Satoshi have some discussion to turn bitcoin into a scientific mining before? And he rejected your offer?

You don't even understand what Bitcoin is all about or why it's created, you need to do some research on the proof of work algorithm, to hell with scientific.

Bitcoin was created decentralized and also as a transparent payment solution, what the hell is science have to do with Bitcoin? Ok accepted that Bitcoin is shitcoin, why are you on here then? It's Bitcointalk forum for Christ sake, why the guy to open a profile on here?

I choose decentralization over science bruh,  that's why I am loving what Bitcoin is offering, sciences? If that's the case with Bitcoin I doubt we will get to where we are today.

So OP, tell me the name of your precious little shitcoin that you believe to be better than Bitcoin, people like you always do, that's what motives people like you to talk trash about Bitcoin, I am waiting for your reply.

Bitcoin is a great innovation in the financial system. Bitcoin was created as an electronic payment network that allows anyone to use it in transparent transactions.
If according to a professor bitcoin is not a great scientific discovery, then the answer from a student who is still studying in a room taught by the best graduate teachers in their respective fields, is the discovery of paper money that you and I use every day as a means of payment is an invention? great and historic?

According to you, Bitcoin is a shitcoin or another type that is bad in your eyes, it's better not to use it and let me and the people who recognize it as a great discovery who don't have Ph.D. use it all the time.

-Aprilio

Okay, I understand your frustration. Satoshi didnt want to progress science. Decentralised value transfer was the goal. Could science have been involved? Perhaps. However, labelling all cryptocurrencies 'shitcoins' may be unfair.

Consider that not all algorithms or procedures benefit society by advancing science. Consider your phone. It doesnt advance research, but it sure simplifies your life, right?

That said, I do see your frustration with the community. However, some of the people you've met may have had bad days or have different viewpoints. Does that make the community or technology "shit"? I doubt it.

Your enthusiasm for science is admirable. However, insults may not be the greatest method to make your argument. Saying "you are pathetic" doesnt help either - so I will not say that
 

You don't really mean that! I reckon you're trashing the Bitcoin community not because you genuinely dislike Bitcoin, but because people didn't accept YOUR little shitcoin instead. Let's face it, if Bitcoin never existed, your shitcoin wouldn't have a leg to stand on, would it? Despite that fancy Ph.D. of yours, you couldn't come up with an original idea, so you're just hitching a ride on someone else's brilliance and trying to cash in on it.

And now you're pissed that your little scheme failed.

You can simply create your own algorithm and look for ways people Neill support your project. Although, I see your project to be a completely failed one. Satoshi Nakamoto deserves the praise but you critics deserves nothing because you can not create anything but be condemning the good things that other people have created.

I will not ask you to mind your own business but I would prefer you to mind your language, if you think the mining algorithm is useless then prove why. Why did you think it should be used in advanced sciences and in what sectors of AS? Why do you think Bitcoin and all other adults are shitcoins, while technically they are not.

They are different from each other in different ways, but you making this statement makes you open to various criticisms. I am an open-minded person, and I am all ears to hear your side. Please share why you think BTC is shitcoin and have a useless mining algorithm

1.Who the hell is "Joseph Van Name Ph.D."? Is that you real name? It doesn't sound real to me.
2.Your response looks really immature and childish. Are you really above 18 years old? Only a kid or a teenager would write such post.
Only a butthurt teen would insult the entire BTC community, only because "Bitcoin mining hasn't been used for science purposes".
I don't mind the Bitcoin mining algorithm to be used for science purposes. If you have a serious proposal just try to spread your message across the miners and developers and try to convince them. Such proposal might get accepted, if we have consensus. Insulting the entire community doesn't help.
If you want crypto mining to be used for science, then why don't you create your own "science coin", where the mining algorithm will be used for scientific purposes?

Well, I think Bitcoin mining mechanism that have not change for years will definitely be due to one or more reason which I think the developers have not find the perfect mining algorithm that will secure the bitcoins transparency and security standard. It is totally useless to bring in new method that corrupt the system. @Op I understand your frustrations over this issue but I think you should observe this matter critically.

And op, I think speaking rashly about bitcoins in this forum will not help matters instead it will spike reaction. Many person have thought about same issue and you and I know it very well that bitcoins developers are still working tirelessly to see how they can improve mining algorithm.

If bitcoins has maintain a good name and a high level of security standard with no incident of any bridging since it's creation, we must appreciate this great effort and look forward a better system.

I find this post really funny. Saying that Bitcoin is the ultimate shitcoin is quite a big accusation and one has to be careful with something like that because it could just be another FUD at a time when we don't need such a thing. Now, for anyone that dislike Bitcoin am suggesting you go somewhere else away from the cryptocurrency industry. This is not a perfect industry but Bitcoin has already proven itself for so many years and will be a strong influence into the future.

Bitcoin is good or bad, it has been evaluated by the world community, and what is happening shows that people are bullish about bitcoin. If OP thinks bitcoin is trash or useless then he should create something better than bitcoin before wanting to criticize or belittle it. If we want to criticize someone, belittle something, we best need evidence or we have to be better than them. If we don't have those things, we are useless people and useless people have no right to criticize anyone.

I don't know if OP has created anything that benefits the world, but I know bitcoin is bringing a lot of benefits to many people in the world.

there's no way you are a Ph.D.  

well according to you I am stupid and you gave me a negative trust.

I have a simple question from a simple mind such as myself.

What al gore rythm do you want us to use.

Since I am stupid I guess you won’t bother to answer.

i'm sure that you're not smarter than satoshi, even a quarter of satoshi's smartness i'm sure you don't have, and that phd of yours i doubt you really have it. so you should stop saying things that are not in your domain because it only shows that you are just a person who talks about nothing and you should be embarrassed because no one here cares about what you say.

An algorithm that "wastes" energy and provides no value is necessary and unavoidable.

Suppose the results from mining had value and miners could access that value. There would be an increase in revenue that would make mining more affordable and attract more mining capacity. The result would be an increase in the difficulty equivalent to the additional value accessed by miners.

In the end, the waste would not change and any value extracted from mining would have a cost equal to its value, and so there would be no net benefit.

Here's a simple example.

Suppose the block reward is 10 bitcoins and the cost of mining a block approaches 10 bitcoins, the value of the block reward (that's how the economics of mining works). In this case, energy worth 10 bitcoins is wasted.

Now, suppose that the results from mining a block produces some kind of scientific value that the miner could sell for 1 bitcoin. Due to economic incentives, miners would then increase their capacity until the cost of mining approaches 11 bitcoins because the extra 1 bitcoin of revenue allows them to break even at that cost. Now, energy worth 10 bitcoins is still wasted and the scientific value costs miners 1 bitcoin.

My belief is that the only way a mining algorithm that produces something of value could reduce waste would be to produce a public good. However, it is not clear that public goods actually exist.

You were tagged for not being well mentally maybe it relates to what you’re just exhibiting on this post currently. You’ve earned some merits from your past post that were of value to the forum, that shows your mental health was great before now. Sorry, although I don’t know what happened after then, but I wish you quick recovery.

So anything that doesn't advance science is anti-science? So, let's say for example if Bitcoin's mining algorithm actually "advances science", would it end up being anti other industries based on your description?

While Bitcoin definitely isn't perfect, it simply won't be able to please everyone lmao.

Bitcoin is not altcoin and isn't a shitcoin.

Altcoins are mostly not Proof of Work coins and they are mostly not mineable coins but they are either Proof of Stake or mintable tokens. Mining and minting, staking are very different and Bitcoin is a biggest Proof of Work cryptocurrency if you only compare it to Proof of Work altcoins.

It's meaningless to compare Proof of Work Bitcoin with Proof of Stake or Mintable tokens/ altcoins.

https://howmanyconfs.com/

Did Sam Bankman Fried coded or launched any Proof of Work coin? LOL

Please do your research better before you bring discussion here especially when you want to prove Bitcoin is a shitcoin.

If Satoshi Nakamoto is desert, Sam Bankman Fried is a piece of sand in a desert.

I get you troll, but when Bitcoin was made, it wasn't meant to do scientific stuff. It was made to be a new kind of money without needing a middleman.

His main focus was to solve the double-spending, quoting the bitcoin whitepaper


There is not reference to "advance science" in any place on the paper.

Edcrypto91 and sheenshane-If you don't want me to be here, then f@#$ you. Bitcoin attracts people like you precisely because it has an anti-scientific mining algorithm.

sheenshane-And Bitcoin's mining algorithm still does not advance science. Trying to justify waste is stupid. The only reason you want to justify waste is because it turns you on for the same reason it turns John McAfee on. And I bet the demons are giving John McAfee the waste he desires in HELL.

Lol, and why are you here if you don't like Bitcoin?
Bitcoin's mining algorithm, Proof of Work was indeed designed primarily for securing the network and achieving consensus, not for advancing scientific research.  Due to this process, it provides a decentralized and trustless form of digital currency, so there's no correlation with science.

So you are included?
Butthurt.

If you dislike Bitcoin so much why don't you just get rid of your account and move to altcoin .com

Bitcoin's mining algorithm was never designed to advance science. This is because Satoshi lacked the foresight to realize that if Bitcoin got big (which it did), then maybe the mining should be put to good use. Or maybe Satoshi simply lacked the time and resources needed to come up with a scientific mining algorithm (because it is hard, so I don't really blame him). Right now, Bitcoin and all other cryptocurrencies are shitcoins because they have mining algorithms that were never designed to advance science and this is because the cryptocurrency sector is really shitty. They worship Sam Bankman Fried and love being scammed and scamming others because they were not breastfed as babies, but they were shitfed by their dads from the ass. Bitcoin is a shitcoin because everybody in the Bitcoin community acts like shit. The only reason I am making this post right now is to respond to the relentless hate I get for actually standing up for science. You are all a bunch of shitheads.

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.