Property rights can be viewed as an attribute of an economic good. This attribute has four broad components and is often referred to as a bundle of rights:
1.the right to use the good {We can use Bitcoin}
2.the right to earn income from the good {Yes, we do receive a income from it}
3.the right to transfer the good to others {For sure, we can transfer Bitcoin from person to person}
4.the right to enforcement of property rights {The Blockchain makes it easy to provide proof of ownership throught the private key, so property rights can be enforced}
What do the Japanese dispute in these 4 attributes?
1.the right to use the good {We can use Bitcoin}
2.the right to earn income from the good {Yes, we do receive a income from it}
3.the right to transfer the good to others {For sure, we can transfer Bitcoin from person to person}
4.the right to enforcement of property rights {The Blockchain makes it easy to provide proof of ownership throught the private key, so property rights can be enforced}
What do the Japanese dispute in these 4 attributes?
I would like to see the court docs. Anyone in Japan know where this can be found?
Also did a little cross reference to the leaked list...didn't find anyone with that amount of Bitcoin on it. Who filed?
