Author

Topic: Bitcoin-Qt next-test 2013-07-21 (Read 8039 times)

sr. member
Activity: 493
Merit: 250
IDENA.IO - Proof-Of-Person Blockchain
September 02, 2013, 01:55:35 PM
#19
Thanks Luke jr for this exellent job! we are testing right now!
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1003
August 24, 2013, 03:39:00 PM
#18
sipa is working on HD wallet support for Bitcoin-Qt (a prerequisite to real watch-only wallets), so I expect we should see that pop up sometime before 0.10 is released.

could you link to it or him?
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1019
August 19, 2013, 09:46:57 AM
#17
My karma was meant for Luke because he keeps including CC.  Kiss
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
August 17, 2013, 05:38:54 PM
#16
Would it be possible for the importaddress function for watch-only wallets to be merged in? This is something that merchants & services desperately need - to be free from thirdparty sites like blockchain.info

Here it is:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2861
That's just watch-only addresses, and not necessarily useful when you need watch-only wallets (ie, every real-world use case). It missed the merge window for this next-test (it was outdated code and unmergable when I made this), but perhaps it will make it into the next one. Please also remember next-test is not necessarily a good idea to run in production.

You can easily get a watch-only wallet today by using keypoolrefill with an absurdly high number (5 times your expected transaction volume is good) on your spending client, making a backup, and using wallet encryption on that backup with a crazy-long password (you can/should throw away) to destroy the private keys. Note that this will break after transactions, and is probably pretty dangerous to try for non-experts, but if done right can get you a watch-only address that works until Bitcoin-Qt has real support for them.

sipa is working on HD wallet support for Bitcoin-Qt (a prerequisite to real watch-only wallets), so I expect we should see that pop up sometime before 0.10 is released.
newbie
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
August 17, 2013, 04:45:29 PM
#15
Hi Luke,

Thanks for your hard work.

Would it be possible for the importaddress function for watch-only wallets to be merged in? This is something that merchants & services desperately need - to be free from thirdparty sites like blockchain.info

Here it is:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2861
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
★☆★777Coin★☆★
newbie
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
August 14, 2013, 08:22:47 PM
#13
I'm doing some testing. Thanks to the programmers who are doing the hard work.
sr. member
Activity: 369
Merit: 250
August 14, 2013, 05:01:53 AM
#12
+1 for CoinControl


Indeed.

Thanks cozz  Smiley
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
August 12, 2013, 07:50:09 PM
#11
This is causing me problems, since I am trying to get my coins out of my wallet, but it doesn't work right now.  It started to re-index, but hangs at about 12 days ago.  I am using v0.8.1
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1019
July 30, 2013, 05:33:27 AM
#10
+1 for CoinControl
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
July 26, 2013, 10:04:56 AM
#9
Note that this will cause older versions (including 0.8.3 and git master!) to think they need to reindex the block database!
This is due to unspent (and unspendable) outputs being pruned (which older code thinks is a problem because they don't understand it's unspendable).
p2pool uses these every block it finds.

yes agreed
used before older version same happened

better use online wallet like block chain etc?
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
July 25, 2013, 04:26:46 PM
#8
Note that this will cause older versions (including 0.8.3 and git master!) to think they need to reindex the block database!
This is due to unspent (and unspendable) outputs being pruned (which older code thinks is a problem because they don't understand it's unspendable).
p2pool uses these every block it finds.
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
July 24, 2013, 02:17:48 AM
#7
I don't think this needs to be stickied; thanks though!
As far as I am aware, no useful test results have ever come from next-test itself, just from my process of putting it together.
If anyone has found bugs for specific pullrequests, or even reported success for any pullrequests using next-test, please feel free to correct me on this.

It's handy as a risky client (I use it myself), and if people want to take advantage of it for that or for testing, they're welcome to.
However, since no other clients have stickies, I don't see any reason next-test should be special in this regard.

I agree it would be nice to have a clear forum thread describing the basic process of testing pullrequests individually.

in bitcoin-qt in console

typed "walletpassphrase xxxxxx 1"

error:
This is an example of an (unfortunately) not useful bug report Sad
There are probably a dozen pullrequests this could have been triggered by, and I cannot reproduce it myself (it works fine for me).

BCB, if you want to help debug this further, I suggest you go through the list of individual pull requests in the opening post one at a time (they're links)
For each one, do:
1. Look for the most recent post by BitcoinPullTester saying "Automatic sanity-testing: PASSED, see "; if there is one, click on that first link.
2. Browse to the bitcoin/ subdirectory, and download bitcoin-qt.exe
3. Try to reproduce the problem using that bitcoin-qt.exe
4. If it has the bug, go back to the main pullrequest page and post a comment there.
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1002
July 24, 2013, 02:03:11 AM
#6
I will set other threads asking people to test as sticky as well. If there is already such a thread please pm it to me.
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 2216
Chief Scientist
July 23, 2013, 06:59:22 PM
#5
I set the topic as sticky for a while because I think that if anything needs extensive testing it's the software that handles our money.

I would much rather people help test individual pull requests or 'git HEAD' rather than "random collection of changes". Putting eleven unrelated changes together makes figuring out what caused a bug/regression much harder.
BCB
vip
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1002
BCJ
July 23, 2013, 04:20:57 PM
#4
in bitcoin-qt in console

typed "walletpassphrase xxxxxx 1"

error:



selected "retry"



Window 7 Professional
64 Bit
BCB
vip
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1002
BCJ
July 23, 2013, 09:34:53 AM
#3
Testing.
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1002
July 23, 2013, 05:05:19 AM
#2
I set the topic as sticky for a while because I think that if anything needs extensive testing it's the software that handles our money.
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
July 22, 2013, 05:26:14 PM
#1

next-test is a branch of the master bitcoind & Bitcoin-Qt code with as many pull requests merged as possible.
These pull requests are often not well-tested, and may contain serious bugs.

Please note these might possibly corrupt your wallet, destroy your coins (on the network), or worse. No warranty of any kind of provided. BACKUP YOUR WALLET


Today's next-test includes the following pull requests (green are merged now; red are disputed):
Jump to: