Topic: bitcoin split (Read 333 times)
He would have, as forks manifests decentralization that he had always dreamed for, meaning that there is always room for future growth and people voicing out their own opinions and the community coming to a decision by consensus. With these forks we are able to discuss what is the best possible way we could have gone through as a community in order to continue development for bitcoin. Without it development would be stagnant, and holes in the code would remain and would be abused if not for different ideas being presented for development.
I am just wondering if Satoshi Nakamoto anticipated the split of two BITCOIN?
He did not, what more is Satoshi Nakamoto did not like the activation of SegWit into his digital currency because he is dreaming something else for it. And what he is dreaming is now on another alternative coin and that is Bitcoin Cash.
This is spam ^^^
How could you say that? Bitcoin transaction throughput has been expanded many times...Satoshi (FOR SURE) would have anticipated the need for growth as adoption increases. It's the only way for Bitcoin to survive!
I am just wondering if Satoshi Nakamoto anticipated the split of two BITCOIN?
He did not, what more is Satoshi Nakamoto did not like the activation of SegWit into his digital currency because he is dreaming something else for it. And what he is dreaming is now on another alternative coin and that is Bitcoin Cash.
I am just wondering if Satoshi Nakamoto anticipated the split of two BITCOIN?
Jump to: