BitcoinABC is Satoshi's bitcoin that we signed up for....not this segwit2x crap

jonald_fyookball

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1008

Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political

Quote from: jbreher on July 17, 2017, 07:10:19 PM

Quote from: gentlemand on July 17, 2017, 04:06:29 PM

Quote from: Iranus on July 17, 2017, 03:59:19 PM

If you're going to support larger blocks and/or a dynamic block size, why not stick with Bitcoin Unlimited, since you supported that anyway?

Because each iteration turns out to be shittily put together joke. So they have to slink away and glue a new name on in the hope of attracting more saps.

Meh. I'm still running BU. An older version from before the DDoS attacks even. Still fully protecting my non-insignificant nest egg.

I am told that both the next scheduled release of BU and ABC will be compatible with the UAHF.

The official name of the big block chain is Bitcoin Cash.

Mark537

newbie

Activity: 51

Merit: 0

Another useless thread with another useless Bitcoin proposal.

jbreher

legendary

Activity: 3080

Merit: 1688

lose: unfind ... loose: untight

Quote from: gentlemand on July 17, 2017, 04:06:29 PM

Quote from: Iranus on July 17, 2017, 03:59:19 PM

If you're going to support larger blocks and/or a dynamic block size, why not stick with Bitcoin Unlimited, since you supported that anyway?

Because each iteration turns out to be shittily put together joke. So they have to slink away and glue a new name on in the hope of attracting more saps.

Meh. I'm still running BU. An older version from before the DDoS attacks even. Still fully protecting my non-insignificant nest egg.

Iranus

hero member

Activity: 1792

Merit: 534

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: gentlemand on July 17, 2017, 04:06:29 PM

Quote from: Iranus on July 17, 2017, 03:59:19 PM

"Bitcoin XT is satoshi's bitcoin that we signed up for"
"Bitcoin Classic is satoshi's bitcoin that we signed up for"
"Bitcoin Unlimited is satoshi's bitcoin that we signed up for"
"Bitcoin ABC is satoshi's bitcoin that we signed up for"

The last thing Bitcoin needs right now is even more proposals that only have small distinctions from the previous ones. More proposals = more FUD about division.

If you're going to support larger blocks and/or a dynamic block size, why not stick with Bitcoin Unlimited, since you supported that anyway?

Because each iteration turns out to be shittily put together joke. So they have to slink away and glue a new name on in the hope of attracting more saps.

I laughed extremely loud when I saw some of the bold claims they make about themselves on their website.

Quote from: https://www.bitcoinabc.org/

A fork of the stable Bitcoin Core, Bitcoin ABC aims to build on this base with improved code quality.

They only seem to have popped up in the last couple of weeks, and they're already claiming to create better code than Bitcoin Core?

gentlemand

legendary

Activity: 2604

Merit: 3056

Welt Am Draht

Quote from: Iranus on July 17, 2017, 03:59:19 PM

"Bitcoin XT is satoshi's bitcoin that we signed up for"
"Bitcoin Classic is satoshi's bitcoin that we signed up for"
"Bitcoin Unlimited is satoshi's bitcoin that we signed up for"
"Bitcoin ABC is satoshi's bitcoin that we signed up for"

The last thing Bitcoin needs right now is even more proposals that only have small distinctions from the previous ones. More proposals = more FUD about division.

If you're going to support larger blocks and/or a dynamic block size, why not stick with Bitcoin Unlimited, since you supported that anyway?

Because each iteration turns out to be shittily put together joke. So they have to slink away and glue a new name on in the hope of attracting more saps.

As Bitmain is introducing their new fork on August 1st we'll see what the market has to say. I think it might consist of two words. The first starts with an F and the seconds ends with two of them.

Iranus

hero member

Activity: 1792

Merit: 534

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

"Bitcoin XT is satoshi's bitcoin that we signed up for"
"Bitcoin Classic is satoshi's bitcoin that we signed up for"
"Bitcoin Unlimited is satoshi's bitcoin that we signed up for"
"Bitcoin ABC is satoshi's bitcoin that we signed up for"

The last thing Bitcoin needs right now is even more proposals that only have small distinctions from the previous ones. More proposals = more FUD about division.

If you're going to support larger blocks and/or a dynamic block size, why not stick with Bitcoin Unlimited, since you supported that anyway?

Goms

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Don't worry, people will finally arrive at the conclusion that segwit coins are not Satoshi's btc by the time they have to pay through their nose for transaction fees.

25hashcoin

hero member

Activity: 574

Merit: 500

Segwit coins are not bitcoin! https://youtu.be/VoFb3mcxluY

franky1

legendary

Activity: 4424

Merit: 4794

i dont have issues with the EB
i dont have issues with dynamics

i dont have issues with increasing block sigops...

but what i do think needs to be sorted are:
"
maximum allowed size of a single transaction is 1,000,000 bytes (1MB)
maximum allowed number of sigops for a single transaction is 20k .
"

this is seriously just leaving a window open for abuse
reduce the bloat per tx
reduce the sigops per tx

25hashcoin

hero member

Activity: 574

Merit: 500

Quote from: ?? on ??

I can't find much about BitcoinABC, but i think raising block size a lot could risk decentralization especially the block sizes adjusted through votes among miners and i totally disagree with "Miners can choose the size of the blocks they want to mine, with a default of 2 MB." since it could cause disaster if all miners choose minimum block size while there are many unconfirmed transcation. Just CMIIW since i can't find much info.
If you really think BitcoinABC is the best/true solution, maybe you should give link to article which can explain more about BitcoinABC rather than say SegWit is bad/unsafe/evil.

Did you read the article in the original post? Also, you have been misled about blocksize increase causing centralization. Sounds like you need to read the Bitcoin Whitepaper https://www.bitcoin.com/bitcoin.pdf

25hashcoin

hero member

Activity: 574

Merit: 500

http://www.bitcoinabc.org

Let's finally scale bitcoin truly and take this baby to $100k a coin and worldwide adoption. Segwit2x is proven garbage that will keep stifling Bitcoins growth. https://medium.com/the-publius-letters/segregated-witness-a-fork-too-far-87d6e57a4179

Segwit coins are not bitcoin: https://youtu.be/VoFb3mcxluY

Topic: BitcoinABC is Satoshi's bitcoin that we signed up for....not this segwit2x crap (Read 774 times)