Topic: BitcoinEXpress doesn't deliver (Read 1024 times)
I love trolling, but this was a little flat. A little lazy. But I give it a B-, so thanks for the effort.
Looks to me like Moneroman88 is trying to troll BCX into attacking Ethereum ...
It was true in 2012 and it was true in 2015, it's probably true now. He doesn't deliver.
Sorry to bump but this has to be distributed once more. For all those who don't know, BitcoinEXpress threatened to take down the Monero network. Nothing ever happened.
Sorry to bump but this has to be distributed once more. For all those who don't know, BitcoinEXpress threatened to take down the Monero network. Nothing ever happened.
Actually he threatened to unleash a Monero exploit etc long ago
and instead he made an offer to help them fix their vulnerability and he DID !
So you are bitching he did not keep this vulnerability private and attack Monero ?
He disclosed security flaws = MoneroTwat your fucking full of shit (as always)
And i have personally witnessed him take coins down before long ago.
So not only the above point is proof but he has done it before more than once (long ago)
Game Coin ring a bell ?
Apparently the infamous attack was a complete success.
Oh, hold on. The goal posts have been moved.
YET AGAIN!
I want to keep this this thread strictly on topic, there are plenty of open threads to flame in. I encourage everyone to click report if this thread gets off topic.
Both goals of the "attack" were accomplished.
1) To focus you guys on central point to build hash rate to harden LTC against an obvious evolving 51% attack
2) To demonstrate that a hard coded solution is needed as hash rate alone is not enough.
Hard coding a 51% protection is simple really, but how do you engineer it so that it won't be abused?
Thoughts?
Both goals of the "attack" were accomplished.
1) To focus you guys on central point to build hash rate to harden LTC against an obvious evolving 51% attack
2) To demonstrate that a hard coded solution is needed as hash rate alone is not enough.
Hard coding a 51% protection is simple really, but how do you engineer it so that it won't be abused?
Thoughts?
Oh, hold on. The goal posts have been moved.
YET AGAIN!
I think we all congratulate him for a successful waste of our time.
You've been trolled.
You've been trolled.
He delivered all right. He delivered insight into just what kind of people support LTC and it isn't a pretty sight.
He looks like a pretty sick bunny too.
Some of the people who support LTC, not all of them. It is possible to have a reasonable conversation with some LTC folks. The only problem is 200 screaming speculators swoop in and hijack the thread if you try to do it here.
I think we all congratulate him for a successful waste of our time.
You've been trolled.
You've been trolled.
He delivered all right. He delivered insight into just what kind of people support LTC and it isn't a pretty sight.
He looks like a pretty sick bunny too.
"What kind of people support LTC"
I do believe you've spent some time painting all who touch an LTC with one brush. Are you angry? Perhaps roughsex with your favourite hooker will make you feel better. In the meantime, this episode is just a blip of words on a screen and all those who have an interest in LTC are not the same "kind of people".
I think we all congratulate him for a successful waste of our time.
You've been trolled.
You've been trolled.
He delivered all right. He delivered insight into just what kind of people support LTC and it isn't a pretty sight.
He looks like a pretty sick bunny too.
It's funny cuz almost no one fell for this lol
Aren't you CoinHunter/RealSolid/Brad Pitt ?
Also...
Do you RAPE all Bitcoins ? even new unconfirmed blocks of Bitcoins ?
Also...
Do you RAPE all Bitcoins ? even new unconfirmed blocks of Bitcoins ?
I think we all congratulate him for a successful waste of our time.
You've been trolled.
You've been trolled.
Jump to: