Author

Topic: Bitcointalk Accounts seller. Should be tagged by DT (Read 325 times)

hero member
Activity: 2660
Merit: 651
Want top-notch marketing for your project, Hire me

I have this in stock gentleman's;

Sr member I have currently (2 In Stock) - $60

Hero Member 1 (1 In stock) $80

Legendary memeber (1 in stock) $110

He is selling legendary account for my weekly incomes in signature campaign.
or he is trying to scam someone and he is not even selling, or those spammers account are very cheap.

I doubt a spammer account could get into any good campaing now (except for the yobit cryptotalk campaign.)
I agreed with what you said base on the price of the account cause the merit system has made it hard for anyhow individual to up rank but I don't think he's going to spam his buyer cause I believed the account he's going to sell will be an account that's already been tagged or giving red trust.
Concern the mentioned campaign, the campaign was maintained by Yahoo and the community is watching every participant on the campaign so the campaign is still in good condition.
member
Activity: 121
Merit: 40
I haven't looked at campaign/bounty requirements lately--are new campaigns requiring merits now?
I haven't done this, I don't know this, I can't remember that.
Write a story with that and that's a constructive post?
legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 3045
Top Crypto Casino
About fulypak account. He deserves to be ban for blatantly selling account.
Sadly, this is not going to happen. He didn't break any rule.

account sales are not against the forum rules:
18. Having multiple accounts and account sales are allowed, but account sales are discouraged.

All that can be done is to tag account sellers/buyers which has been already done in fulypak's case and obviously that didn't stop him.
copper member
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1179
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
As per advise above, Tagging them will not gonna affect there operations that much since they can easily create new account. I highly suggest to set trap for them just like buy bust operations so that you can kill the root of all this account selling.

---
About fulypak account. He deserves to be ban for blatantly selling account.
legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 6089
bitcoindata.science
Why do you say that?  I haven't looked at campaign/bounty requirements lately--are new campaigns requiring merits now?  Last I checked (and that was quite a while ago), there were only a few managers who were putting merit requirements on applicants.  That would be pretty sweet if that were the case, even though I'm sure a high-ranked, bought account would have no problem buying merits from somebody.  We all know that happens.

Usually managers do not require many earned merits.... However, I am saying that those accounts are not valuable based on the account prices:

I have this in stock gentleman's;

Sr member I have currently (2 In Stock) - $60

Hero Member 1 (1 In stock) $80

Legendary memeber (1 in stock) $110

He is selling legendary account for my weekly incomes in signature campaign.
or he is trying to scam someone and he is not even selling, or those spammers account are very cheap.

I doubt a spammer account could get into any good campaing now (except for the yobit cryptotalk campaign.)
legendary
Activity: 3528
Merit: 7005
Top Crypto Casino
The real thing is to tag the accounts that are being sold. Much harder to track, but the only way it could be effective...
I'd tag them both, but it's useless when someone creates a throwaway account to do the selling with.  If anybody finds any accounts that were sold, drop me a PM and I'll look into it.  Those should be red-tagged immediately.

After the introduction of the merit system those sold accounts are much less valuable, which is a good thing.
Why do you say that?  I haven't looked at campaign/bounty requirements lately--are new campaigns requiring merits now?  Last I checked (and that was quite a while ago), there were only a few managers who were putting merit requirements on applicants.  That would be pretty sweet if that were the case, even though I'm sure a high-ranked, bought account would have no problem buying merits from somebody.  We all know that happens.
legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 6089
bitcoindata.science
Tagging an account seller is basically worthless. This user mentioned above has an avatar "Account Seller", promoting his "service".

The real thing is to tag the accounts that are being sold. Much harder to track, but the only way it could be effective...

After the introduction of the merit system those sold accounts are much less valuable, which is a good thing.
legendary
Activity: 2366
Merit: 2054
User https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/fullypak-459881 PM me to sell his senior member
Quote
Hello, i can provide to you senior member accounts to join Yobit signature campaign. You don't have to wait for 14 days because of changing password. There is original e-mail addresses or fake e-mails and old private key.

Price: 0,033 BTC / 0.03 BTC for bulk
Look like big dealer account here.
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1775
It seems that, @ danservic1, @ daninvites1, no matter what the people here say, he actually creates a newbie account that keeps on doing the action, selling the account. This person cannot be trusted.
Even though he was tagged.

[1]. danservic1

Topic: Sell High qualtiy Bitcointalk accounts

[2]. daninvites1

Topic: Sell Bitcointalk accounts 2 Years experience

Contact me

WhatAapp
+52 1 322 231 7595

Skype
[email protected]

http://archive.is/mLotI

Contact me

WhatAapp
+52 1 322 231 7595

Skype
[email protected]

http://archive.is/VRhiT
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1189
Need Campaign Manager?PM on telegram @sujonali1819
This guy create a account today and want to sell bitcointalk account.

Link of selling post : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/sell-high-qualtiy-bitcointalk-accounts-5188709

Archive : http://archive.is/jNEIm

Id link : https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/danservic1-2688075

Jump to: