I'm guessing they'll probably be criminally convicted for the hack to provide some sort of punishment for that considering they held the funds for so long before they were returned... It seems strange that wasn't part of the initial deal for a plea bargain if they held on to the funds and used those as a negotiating tool (though that might not have worked - withholding 10% though might).
The American legal system's strange, strange. It's easy getting criminally convicted it's easy avoiding jail. They've traded plea bargains in famous high profile cases before it's happening in crocodile of wall street.
They're connected. Even if they didn't carry out the hack they've laundered money. If you're laundering $71 million or $4.5 billions it ends with criminals jailed. How's their plea bargain getting them safe from jail I think it's getting them less sentencing time. If plea bargain succeeds they're going to be old when they get out.
I'm confused is Bitfinex getting back all 119,754 bitcoin worth Billions or just $71 million?
That's between the DOJ and Bitfinex, unless the court decides that the bitcoins have to be returned to the ones owning them at the moment of the hack, the customers, and thus voiding bitfinex repayment scheme all of them will go to the exchange. From there it will be customers vs bitfinex and it will have nothing to do with the two above.
It's another strange situation. If Bitfinex customers got funded back on Bitfinex expenses those Bitcoins belong to Bitfinex. What was Bitfinex repayment scheme?