Author

Topic: {BitfuryASIC/BTCGuild} Hashrates Gap - 470GH noncerate vs. 420GH miningpool (Read 1076 times)

legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1002
your welcome Smiley happy its better for you
newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
is there any reason you using 3 worker names? if there on the same connection id suggest just using 1 using 3 might be using unnecessary bandwidth


We choose this configuration because it was the most efficient a few hours after start. Now we've directed the 3 ports to the same worker using 1 unique name as you suggested, the two rates seem stick closer indeed, sometimes it's reversed so as pool estimated rate is higher than noncerate... interesting ! Thanks for the advice
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1002
is there any reason you using 3 worker names? if there on the same connection id suggest just using 1 using 3 might be using unnecessary bandwidth
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
Hello,

We are actually facing a gap between our noncerate and pool hashrates (470GH vs.420GH). Could anyone help us finding a way to reduce such gap?

We thought it might be because of our difficulty settings on BTC Guild:




Or our bitfury pool configuration:




Our hardware is 16 hcards (25GH/card tested) on a single mboard

and here is our stats on BTC Guild:




So yeah basically it is tested for 25GH/card so having more (424GH total) is very nice but it would be even better if it was closer to the noncerate hash rate.  Grin


Thx!



PS: or could it be someone in the pool hijacking the difference for his own use?  Shocked
Jump to: