Topic: Bitmixer spammers (Read 498 times)
There is already a thread by botany about it: Bitmixer Spammers. It would be beneficial if you continued the discussion there and locked this thread.
The Bitmixer campaign has been running for a long time and I think the campaign manager doesn't really care about it anymore. I've heard cases where there were people with negative trust in the campaign but I don't think the bot sensors that so they aren't even noticed. I agree with Aubert, they should hire a new campaign manager for that and kick out the spammers in the campaign.
Marco had already requested list of spammers to mexxer's thread and i think mexxer had already listed few. Maybe you can update mexxers thread to expose these low quality posters, people kept viewing this thread from time to time. this is it https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/public-list-of-yobit-spammersthis-ones-gonna-be-long-boys-1241968
IIRC there were three campaign participants on the list of spammers since couple of months ago and it was Yobit / Secondstrade / Bitmixer and since two of those are improving, the next one is surely Bitmixer campaign now (one step at the time). I used to monitor their owners activity and he seem to be online only in a limited manner and only entertains few PM's base on my observation alone and sure enough I think a similar approach should be taken towards him until he cleans his campaigns participants list since there are a lot who are getting paid for little to no effort.
On a side note: There are a lot of users that need to be kicked out of their campaign for violating their own rules but again their owner is too late to take actions.
Well bitmixer should get their own campaign manager or a modertor like what yobit did when they assigned hilarious to managed the spammers if that's the case. On a side note: There are a lot of users that need to be kicked out of their campaign for violating their own rules but again their owner is too late to take actions.
I just don't get why bitmixer is allowing this people to tarnish their reputation because of what their participants are doing. If he's not making any actions then maybe it's only fair that he gets a red tag just like what happens in secondstrade. He only took action when he noticed the red tag.
IIRC there were three campaign participants on the list of spammers since couple of months ago and it was Yobit / Secondstrade / Bitmixer and since two of those are improving, the next one is surely Bitmixer campaign now (one step at the time). I used to monitor their owners activity and he seem to be online only in a limited manner and only entertains few PM's base on my observation alone and sure enough I think a similar approach should be taken towards him until he cleans his campaigns participants list since there are a lot who are getting paid for little to no effort.
On a side note: There are a lot of users that need to be kicked out of their campaign for violating their own rules but again their owner is too late to take actions.
On a side note: There are a lot of users that need to be kicked out of their campaign for violating their own rules but again their owner is too late to take actions.
It will surely help when Bitmixer will more actively look into their campaign participants.
I just think the operator is not interested because he is too busy.
I just think the operator is not interested because he is too busy.
Cos as of now most shit posters are coming from yobit.. I think this get to paid shit posters needs to be banned
Since bitmixer is operating a bot, I saw that there are people who are spamming with bitmixer sig and being paid with their shitposts. Also there are people in there with negative trust whic are still being paid.
This guy is copy pasting a warning on investor -based games to increase his post count plus he is mostly posting one liners.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/monnt-393987
How come yobit has all the complaints while the bitmixer doesn't even make any actions against this? Also I saw seconstrade are already cleaning up. Aren't bitmixer supposed to get a warning also if they don't manage these spammers in their campaign?
This guy is copy pasting a warning on investor -based games to increase his post count plus he is mostly posting one liners.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/monnt-393987
How come yobit has all the complaints while the bitmixer doesn't even make any actions against this? Also I saw seconstrade are already cleaning up. Aren't bitmixer supposed to get a warning also if they don't manage these spammers in their campaign?
Jump to: