1. 10% house edge is too high
2. Not provably fair.
3. No way to enforce 50 tickets max per person. I can use multiple addresses
4. Who the fuck would want to play a raffle with 0.5 EV
5. Supporting newbies is not charity. Supporting registered nonprofits may be a good idea, but not random newbies
6. You're too new.
2. Not provably fair.
3. No way to enforce 50 tickets max per person. I can use multiple addresses
4. Who the fuck would want to play a raffle with 0.5 EV
5. Supporting newbies is not charity. Supporting registered nonprofits may be a good idea, but not random newbies
6. You're too new.
1. What is a good "House Edge"?
2. Could you give me an idea on how to make it fair?
3. Okay, didnt think about that...
4. What would be a good ticket price, ticket count, winner count, and "jackpot" size be?
5. Okay, well my second thought would be to support Habitat for Humanity-Haiti, for I am going there mid-summer to help build homes...sound ok?
6. So what you're saying is I should develop a "rep" before going and posting something like this?
Also, why so "nicht-so-nett? Instead of using cuss words and trying to drive me away, you could give me an idea on how to make it work, and other good advice.
I think we're just trying to say it isn't going to work. Maybe try innovating something that already exists within the Bitcoin world & then releasing that. Releasing something like this which has been done so many times isn't going to get you anywhere, you're just going to end up wasting your time.
You should have also done a bit of research before hand and looked into the games that already exist (Peerbet....) along with stuff like house edge. Your raffle just doesn't appeal in any aspects what so ever.
I see... alright well that stinks... Time to go back to the drawing board I guess, eh?
