While, this is seen as a further step in the penetration of crypto into the mainstream, it further establish the fact that bitcoin cannot replace banks because no matter how much freedom it offers to detest the use of banks, it won't happen because they will always find a way to feature in the future.
Bitcoin is nearly 10 years old, and the fact is, only hardcore nerds seem able to cope with having their own hardware wallets and being their own banks.
The general public wants something easy to operate. Just as they don't really know how their phones work, they don't really know how bitcoin works and don't care.
In the 1990's the big leap forward in PC use was Microsoft Windows 1995, which had a easy user interface. Before that, you had to type C:dos/run and actually give your computer commands, and most people couldn't cope and PC adoption was low.
It was the same story with email. People couldn't cope with having their own website and email which they controlled through a cpanel. It wasn't till the big cloud operators offered yahoo email, hotmail and gmail that email took off.
If we want adoption, we have to dumb things down. And getting a banking licence and linking wallets to bank accounts is part of that.