Bitcoin experts clearly right?
if a server has a file that lists their private keys and labels them to the associated address, to know which key is for which address
then a hacker can just scan the server for addresses in a file, and grab any/all files containing that address, thus then grabbing privatekey just by association
for instance bitwise is using legacy, thus no multisig of split keys on different devices, so by hacking bitwise computers and only downloading files containing its reserves bitcoin address, they can quickly mostlikely grab a file with privkey too
This goes back to my whole point... if they are Bitcoin experts as they claim to be, since they are selling their ETFs this way then there's no need to have a file with priv keys to address. It doesn't make sense, you can just give private key you have access to wallet, you don't need to list an address near it.
If they do, it's pretty dumb, a hacker can scan for btc address string easily anyway?
But I get your point
well who said rich people were smart
SEC meant to be a authority of financial security. yet had their twitter account hacked
anyways
if someone has many wallet.dat files. finding the one containing the privkey of the large fund is easy via searching public address
look whats in a wallet.dat file
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Wallet#Bitcoin_Core
- keypairs for each of your addresses
- transactions done from/to your addresses