Author

Topic: Block #273374 OLDER than block #273373 ? How is it possible??? (Read 859 times)

newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
Thank you hashman and RaTTuS for your clarification!

legendary
Activity: 1264
Merit: 1008
It's happened before.  The timestamp is not so important on a scale of block to block, in this case there is clearly a small error in the timestamp because the miner of block 273374 clearly had in hand block 273373 as she included hash of it in her block.  Timestamps become important when it is time to set difficulty, which is why we wait two weeks to adjust the difficulty.. these kind of small errors go out in the wash. 

 
hero member
Activity: 792
Merit: 1000
Bite me
down to the clock on the block owners machine ...
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
Hi,

I just noticed that as per blockchain.info that block #273374 seems to be OLDER than block #273373. ¿How could this be possible? Could it just be a delay in blockchain.info's reception time?

Any explanation would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers!
Jump to: