There is much discussion on the topic of block size.
What is lacking in these talks is hard data.
Benchmarks, evidence, testing which conclusively demonstrate block size makes a difference in transactions.
The block size debate is a loose equivalent to debates geeks had in past years where some believed increasing RAM on a PC could make a big improvement in performance, while others held the opposing view; increasing RAM wouldn't make a noticeable difference in most cases.
The block size debate is like Intel vs AMD all over again.
We have benchmarks and testing that can quantify to a reasonable degree how Intel and AMD processors stack up against each other.
Where are benchmarks showing bitcoin unlimited or segwit have a legitimate claim to better transaction speed via increasing block size?
