Author

Topic: blockchain.info is now calling itself Blockchain - stop the confusion! (Read 1163 times)

full member
Activity: 472
Merit: 100
Gamblica Pre-Sale launch 01.03.2018!
+n

it just like "Apple" which can serve as a mobile phone brand, but shouldn't and can't as a brand of the fruit, the blockchain.info team is bullying now   Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry
they just occupy a good pit latrine
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1040
A Great Time to Start Something!
They are safer than many other online wallets, and completely fine for small to medium amounts. Agreed that they should not try to be branded as 'Blockchain'.

Quote
Another blockchain.info wallet has been hacked...

Since the private keys are on the users computer, then it must have been a weakness/malware on a local machine.
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
Another blockchain.info wallet has been hacked
Luckily the hacker return the bitcoin.

But, i think you are right, some people actually believed blockchain has been hacked
I think blockchain.info team should reconsider a new name.

+n

it just like "Apple" which can serve as a mobile phone brand, but shouldn't and can't as a brand of the fruit, the blockchain.info team is bullying now   Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry

Apple fruit & Apple mobile phone brand are very different
While blockchain.info & blockchain are similar in newbie eyes

I agree Blockchain.info should consider a new name. When I was brand new, I thought it was the official site. It's easy to mistake that. I often wonder why people leave large amounts of money there, but have to remind myself new people think it's safe, because it's official... only to find out it's not the hard way further down the line.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 251
Knowledge its everything
Another blockchain.info wallet has been hacked
Luckily the hacker return the bitcoin.

But, i think you are right, some people actually believed blockchain has been hacked
I think blockchain.info team should reconsider a new name.

+n

it just like "Apple" which can serve as a mobile phone brand, but shouldn't and can't as a brand of the fruit, the blockchain.info team is bullying now   Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry

Apple fruit & Apple mobile phone brand are very different
While blockchain.info & blockchain are similar in newbie eyes
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
+n

it just like "Apple" which can serve as a mobile phone brand, but shouldn't and can't as a brand of the fruit, the blockchain.info team is bullying now   Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry

+1o1
newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
+n

it just like "Apple" which can serve as a mobile phone brand, but shouldn't and can't as a brand of the fruit, the blockchain.info team is bullying now   Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry
legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1029
I agree with both puppet and Johnny, but to be honest posting here won't do anything... Perhaps try to contact them directly.
hero member
Activity: 795
Merit: 514
Zalek, the problem isn't Blockchain. The problem is the shady journalism that comes out of sites like CoinDesk, who run intentionally misleading headlines because they generate more clicks. Then they have the nerve to deny responsibility and tell you to ask Blockchain to rebrand!

It's also worth noting that the headline directly above the one you mentioned reads "New Blockchain Startup Brings Contracts into the Digital Age". In this case, "Blockchain" refers to an entirely different "Blockchain". How convenient.
full member
Activity: 172
Merit: 100
I can kind of relate; when I was first learning what Bitcoin was, finding a website calling itself Blockchain really didn't help my understanding of how the system worked. I thought they were the official Bitcoin site or something. =P
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1040
posting here isnt going to do anything, nor will anything else I fear, but FWIW, I fully agree
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 504
Run a Bitcoin node.
For a while now blockchain.info have rebranded themselves as "Blockchain".

We should not refer to blockchain.info as Blockchain.

Bitcoin is confusing enough for new people without having headlines like "Hacker Returns 225 BTC Taken from Blockchain Wallets":
http://www.coindesk.com/hacker-returns-225-btc-taken-blockchain-wallets/

People might think that the Bitcoin blockchain was hacked.

This is a call to blockchain.info to rebrand themselves back to blockchain.info, or something that is not confusing. Please, do the responsible thing and end this confusion.

I tried to send this message directly to blockchain.info, but couldn't find a contact email address. So I'm raising this important issue here in the hope that the blockchain.info team see it.
Jump to: