Author

Topic: Blocknet VS Cosmos (Read 1358 times)

hero member
Activity: 771
Merit: 521
May 23, 2017, 07:20:07 AM
#7
There is nothing bad about cosmos. Its just different.  The previous poster is talking about Trust with regards to transactions. Not to the devs.  Maybe you misunderstood?

The Blocknet is the only project in our awareness that decentralises the four core functions of an exchange - capital deposits, order broadcast, order matching, and coin exchange.
all coins stay in wallets
orders are broadcast over an inter-chain DHT network overlay
order books are compiled by local applications, not a central or distributed entity
coin exchange is atomic and trustless, utilising OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY and not requiring the control of any third party.
As for interoperability in general and the emerging token ecosystem, the Blocknet is deliberately designed to function as infrastructure. No central chain is required, enabling services to be built on any chain and monetised and delivered over xbridgep2p, our "blockchain router," to nodes on any other chain and to dapps harnessing blockchain services.

As for Cosmos, (a) its consensus algorithm is DPOS and (b) it relies on anchors/validators and so is vulnerable to collusion attacks.
These two points amount to Cosmos being a distributed system, but not one in which control is decentralised (that's what "decentralised" means btw - it's about control).
Thirdly - and correct me if I'm mistaken - Cosmos' approach is architecturally ill-fated to run afoul of the emerging "token ecosystem" by requiring inter-chain services to run on its chain only.
This is another way of saying that it is "inter-chain centralised," may be fine for sidechains, but is not suitable for an inter-chain era where it becomes the norm for dapps to become inter-chain orchestrations of on-chain microservices.

https://www.reddit.com/r/theblocknet/comments/676buj/ask_anything_about_blocknet_qa/
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1024
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
April 17, 2017, 09:33:04 AM
#6
Cosmos needs some kind of trust, Block is fully trustless and 100% decentralized.

Cosmos is beginning to code their platform, Block`s interchain platform is already ready.

You see now the huge advantage of Block.
What is make you think ig cosmos looks bad in your opinion? I think they're a solid team. With result of his ico and a lot of people are trust them to develop its idea right now.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
April 17, 2017, 08:34:21 AM
#5
Cosmos needs some kind of trust, Block is fully trustless and 100% decentralized.

Cosmos is beginning to code their platform, Block`s interchain platform is already ready.

You see now the huge advantage of Block.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
CHIEF GROWTH OFFICER OF GLOBAL ENTERPRENEUR
April 17, 2017, 03:37:20 AM
#4
If the market value is 20 000 000 it is nice for the first stage.
sr. member
Activity: 475
Merit: 251
April 17, 2017, 03:19:14 AM
#3
Blocknet is soon ready.

See the actual price: 0,0009

I think very soon you see 40 Million Market Cap

sr. member
Activity: 532
Merit: 251
Presale Starting May 1st
April 07, 2017, 08:20:00 PM
#2
Ico is over in an incredible time cosmos. But the blocknet will develop faster.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
April 06, 2017, 06:45:35 PM
#1
Hi I just find Blocknet does same thing as Cosmos.

Cosmos raised BIG ICO, but is it better than Blocknet?
Jump to: