Author

Topic: Bonding Curve Offering (BCO) (Read 99 times)

member
Activity: 87
Merit: 19
February 01, 2021, 02:10:24 PM
#7
Quote
The first time I heard about bond curve offering was when I participated in DIA bounty, that's what the project team decide to use to raise funds and I was surprised it went so well, not many projects are using this strategy but the truth is fundraising ways aren't that different from one another and what matters is how good the project plan to be nd how pro are the team

Most likely because the level of difficulty is way higher for a BCO than just coding an ERC20.

A BCO is like a Decentralized Exchange, basically.  Wink
member
Activity: 532
Merit: 41
February 01, 2021, 11:37:42 AM
#6
The first time I heard about bond curve offering was when I participated in DIA bounty, that's what the project team decide to use to raise funds and I was surprised it went so well, not many projects are using this strategy but the truth is fundraising ways aren't that different from one another and what matters is how good the project plan to be nd how pro are the team
member
Activity: 87
Merit: 19
February 01, 2021, 06:35:25 AM
#5
What are the advantages of doing a BCO compared to an ICO/IEO/DCO?


One major difference is that there is no pre-mint.

For ICO/IEO/DCO all tokens are minted upfront, then eventually sold to investors.

In a BCO everyone has to buy from the Curve directly, even the project itself.
As the price raise up quickly along with tokens minted out the contract, it also favors much more early investors.

In addition the liquidity goes inside the contract, not in the pocket of the token issuer.
Thus, it makes it more transparent and ensure permanent liquidity for the token in a decentralized manner.

In other words, there is No more need for market makers doing wash trading all day on centralized exchanges to ensure liquidity. (Case of ICO/IEO)

It is closer from a DCO (DEX Coin offering) without the pre-mint and with a tailor-made AMM favoring much more early investors.
Also more difficult to deploy than a simple ERC20 token  Wink


Quote
seems there is two crowdfunding method born now
in this thread there is a BCO and i read in below article there is a BRO


This BRO seems to be an interesting concept, looking like a SAFT (Standard Agreement for Future Tokens).
Similar to what Polkadot did with DOT but via a smart contract directly instead of paper.

Main difference with BCO is that the BCO contains an AMM and you can not only buy but also sell back to the contract.

Would eventually worth considering to mixing both for more fairness (BCRO?)  
Thanks for sharing Cheesy


Quote
I think there's no unique feature it has over another, still the same thing.


It does have major difference on the way tokens are emitted and in the potential gains for early investors/believers.

Bitcoin mining makes its distribution somehow fair: early miners received a lot, supply decreases overtime, driving its price up progressively.

The BCO contract reproduces this mechanism because every new token minted out of it is exponentially more expensive than the one before.
So if you buy from BCO contract earlier, you get the token at a better price.

Liquidity is also going inside the contract directly, (like a DEX's liquidity pool) so it is more transparent and fair (backs the token price with actual liquidity).


sr. member
Activity: 1232
Merit: 379
January 31, 2021, 05:37:39 PM
#4
I'm just curious about these crowdfunding methods coming into the crypto ecosystem, these days many projects had had had their project to undergo some certain unknown funding methods, recently I heard about IDO- Initial Defi Offering, now Bonding Curve Offering.
AFIAK, this remains the same thing as long as it's all serve the same purpose of selling out tokens, I think there's no unique feature it has over another, still the same thing.
What are the advantages of doing a BCO compared to an ICO/IEO/DCO?
Also IDO, IMO, STO, and many failed ones to mention.
sr. member
Activity: 1414
Merit: 252
Keep it Simple guys :)
January 31, 2021, 04:40:26 PM
#3
Anyone here already familiar with the concept of Bonding Curve Offering?

We have seen a couple over the last months like Aavegotchi (NFT), DXDAO, Perpetual Protocol, Hedgic...

It is a DEX-like token distribution method (mint/burn) with an AMM predicting the price of the token.
The AMM ensure permanent liquidity for the token, limiting liquidity risks which is high for ICOs.

https://defiprime.com/bonding-curve-explained

Have you participated in one yet?
What are your opinion about it?

Asking for feedbacks and opinions as we are considering launching one for TradingBull.io.




seems there is two crowdfunding methode born now
in this thread there is a BCO and i read in below article there is a BRO
https://medium.com/hackernoon/viable-alternative-to-icos-introduction-of-the-believers-reward-offering-bro-7efbdbe0c25f
regards
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
January 31, 2021, 04:18:47 PM
#2
Heard about it but haven't participated in any...

What are the advantages of doing a BCO compared to an ICO/IEO/DCO?

Will look into Aavegotchi more, it looks nice.
member
Activity: 87
Merit: 19
January 31, 2021, 01:36:09 PM
#1
Anyone here already familiar with the concept of Bonding Curve Offering?

We have seen a couple over the last months like Aavegotchi (NFT), DXDAO, Perpetual Protocol, Hedgic...

It is a DEX-like token distribution method (mint/burn) with an AMM predicting the price of the token.
The AMM ensure permanent liquidity for the token, limiting liquidity risks which is high for ICOs.

https://defiprime.com/bonding-curve-explained

Have you participated in one yet?
What are your opinions about it?

Asking for feedbacks as we are considering launching one for TradingBull.io.





Jump to: