Topic: Bounty campaign is Cheap promotion way, why haves a lots of requirement? (Read 92 times)

It is cheap promotion? really? many projects have paid more than $500.000 in bounty campaigns and to individuals more than $1000 many times, if you talk about trash bounties then I agree there is no need for requirements.

The bounty campaigns of today had a lot of requirements yet with a very small payment because of a massive participants. But theres some advantages in making the campaign so hard, because the harder it becomes, the smaller the participants will join then we could expect a larger payments after the campaign..

What you mean? You mean there are so many rules? I think it's fine cause rule is needed to prevent cheater and make participant to work. For example if there is any bounty campaign created without having any rule so there will be so many participants join cause they no need to do anything but still can get money

I think this year's social media campaign is more complicated, sometimes it makes me lazy to participate but I think it's good to anticipate scammers and I would rather participate in bounty portal without having to report.

For now I might just follow bounty campaign with a manager who I think is very professional and wise in sharing rewards, and currently I believe in Btcltcdigger. Because as far as I know, he is a good manager. However I'm sure there are still many bounty managers that are equally good

I agree with all your points, i was also observing from few months that the bounty campaigns are getting tougher rules and requirements everyday, last year i was writing articles for most of ico projects and was approved everytime with decent reward now my articles are getting rejected while im giving them the same time same unique writing style, it is just that they want thousands in traffic as well now which a blog cannot get so im discouraged to write more, same is the case with social media campaigns, strict rules and reporting has discouraged me to participate in new social media campaigns as well, i hope this will change and better opportunities will come up soon for bounty hunters as they fully devote themselves for the promotion of an ico.

Not only are those requirements not overly strict, I think that bitcointalk should do away with bounties altogether.  There's too much abuse, and they attract the lowest form of humanity to them.  The forum would be better off without them.  I think only signature campaigns with reputable managers should be allowed here, because the competition for joining them is so fierce that managers basically have their pick of the best posters.  This isn't so with bounties, where every bottom feeding lowlife can apply multiple times, and they can get away with it.

You are mixing up everything.
4. Proof of join is actually to verify the different IDs filled on the form are of actual bitcointalk ID.
3. Yes, checking individual facebook and twitter share going to each participants profile would take a lot of time.
2. It makes them difficult and might force them to stop.
1. Bounty still have attractive rewards. That's why people are joining them.

I have seen some campaigns with ridiculous requirements but I steer clear of those. I did try twitter bounties but preferred the campaigns where I do not have to report. Selecting a bounty is an individual preference and it seems lots of people do not mind reporting the work. I do not like it and so I just avoid it.

Now there are a lot of bots that participate in bounty programs, and in the tables you can see up to 2000 participants. Payments are very low and now goes beyond a full bounty program of about $ 50. I believe that it is necessary to introduce some restrictions on participation, let's say only 500 people and at least 10,000 subscribers.

The rules you've pointed out are not strict to me. People need to report what they have done over a given period of time. In our various job places, we make reports to our superiors and this report helps check if we did what we were expected to do at a given point in time. So it is not a strict rule to follow.

You should make a thread to Meta, not this one.

Every project have some promotions then only it will grow faster in market. So all kind of promotion and promoters are needed this campaign because strong foundation is the necessary for all the bounty campaign. But some peoples are wrongly understand the bounty requirements.

As we all know that at this time a lot of bounty campaign that we can follow, but with many crypto community who want to follow bounty campaign and lots of cheating that happened, hence bounty manager give many requirement to follow bounty program, one of them is proof report of work for twitter, Facebook even signature campaign.

What we should think about is

1. Will with such complicated requirements will increasing the payment that bounty participants will receive?

2. Does the complicated requirement will make the person who cheating by using someone else's account will stops?

3. Are the bounty managers too tired or even lazy to count so require proof of work?

4.If only to prevent someone from cheating, is it not enough with joining proof autentication

I want to know your opinion all the bounty participants with the many new rules created by the Developer to follow bounty campaign, is it worth it? Because I think if rules are made more complicated, then the bounty participants will prefer bounty with an easy term and condition, and we know with the bounty campaign, is as a means of promotion from the project developers so that more people know and interested to participate in investing , then what if the bounty participants choose not to join bounty campaign with complicated rules? Then of course their sales will decrease. What do you think?