Oh wow, thanks for huge piece of work!
Have only one question, how do you assess a design, think its very subjective
and no so important as team or whitepaper
Topic: [BOUNTY] RATING BY TEAM OF ANALYSTS (Read 158 times)
RESERVED
TELEGRAM GROUP @TRUEBOUNTY UPDATE SOON
TELEGRAM @TRUEBH
BOUNTY SPEADSHEET[FREE NOW]
AIRDROP SPEADSHEET[FREE]
We rating ALL bounties on a branch Bounties (Altcoins) on the day of their release to the forum.
Each BOUNTY passes through 2 rounds of rating.
FIRST ROUND:
A team of 5 (at the moment) people assess each bounty company (website, forum, white paper, idea) and rate on a 100-point scale, after that the ratings of each analyst are summarized in the summary table and the average value is displayed.
WEBSITE: from 0 to 100 points, where 0-no site; 100-site reference from a technical point of view and excellent design.
FORUM THREAD: from 0 to 100 points, where 0 is the awfully designed theme on the forum, without images, without information; 100 - the topic reveals all the details of the Bounty, with the best design.
WHITEPAPER: from 0 to 100 points, where 0-no Whitepaper, and 100-white paper includes the technical component of the project, and after reading it all the questions disappear, as well as framed in the best way.
IDEA/VISION: the idea is difficult to evaluate, so the assessment is subjective and averaged. 0 points is an online store selling snow at Russia, 100 points-the team has a solution to one of the main problems of mankind.
TEAM: evaluates the profiles in the social.networks, the quality of their publication.
RATING OF THE 1ST ROUND: the average value of the rating from 5 analysts.
SECOND ROUND:
Companies that have passed the first round with satisfactory performance are evaluated on secondary criteria.
DURATATION(MONTH) 1,2,3,3+ month
SOCIALS othe assessment is quite subjective and therefore it does not fall into the first round of the assessment, because the bounty of the company are created with one of the goals - to increase activity in the social networks.
BOUNTY LIMIT yes/no
PRODUCT if there is a app, beta sites, etc it adds fat plus of the company.
TWO ROUND RATING: a rating at the end of two rounds of evaluation.
ICObench rating
The table also takes into account the rating of the same company from the site ICObench, for comparison.
ICO BENCH
Other useful information in the table:
BOUNTY START DATE: date of the company's bounty addition to the forum.
BOUNTY END DATE: the end date of the company's bounty.
[ANN]: a corresponding theme with the announcements on the forum
[BOUNTY]: appropriate theme with bounty on forum
MANAGER: Manager on forum, either the reference Site or Telegram
TOKEN: token name
TOKEN NUMBER: number of tokens allocated to the bounty company
TOKEN COST: the value of the token at the time the ICO
ALL BUDGET: the total budget allocated to this bounty (in dollars)
The table also contains notes and links to the site, etc.
NOTES: these are the black triangles on the table cells, when hovering over the corresponding cell show more details.
RED[BAD]: not recommended to participate
YELLOW[MID]: the solution is ambiguous, we recommend if you do not pass the green company conditions
GREEN[GOOD]: recommended for participation
NAVY[BEST]: the best bounty
How to use them? - you can read it in the Telegraph UPDATE SOON
BOUNTY SPEADSHEET[FREE NOW]
TELEGRAM @TRUEBH
BOUNTY SPEADSHEET[FREE NOW]
AIRDROP SPEADSHEET[FREE]
Quote
AIRDROP SPEADSHEET not discussed here, discussions in the relevant thread on board UPDATE SOON
We rating ALL bounties on a branch Bounties (Altcoins) on the day of their release to the forum.
Each BOUNTY passes through 2 rounds of rating.
FIRST ROUND:
A team of 5 (at the moment) people assess each bounty company (website, forum, white paper, idea) and rate on a 100-point scale, after that the ratings of each analyst are summarized in the summary table and the average value is displayed.
WEBSITE: from 0 to 100 points, where 0-no site; 100-site reference from a technical point of view and excellent design.
FORUM THREAD: from 0 to 100 points, where 0 is the awfully designed theme on the forum, without images, without information; 100 - the topic reveals all the details of the Bounty, with the best design.
WHITEPAPER: from 0 to 100 points, where 0-no Whitepaper, and 100-white paper includes the technical component of the project, and after reading it all the questions disappear, as well as framed in the best way.
IDEA/VISION: the idea is difficult to evaluate, so the assessment is subjective and averaged. 0 points is an online store selling snow at Russia, 100 points-the team has a solution to one of the main problems of mankind.
TEAM: evaluates the profiles in the social.networks, the quality of their publication.
RATING OF THE 1ST ROUND: the average value of the rating from 5 analysts.
SECOND ROUND:
Companies that have passed the first round with satisfactory performance are evaluated on secondary criteria.
DURATATION(MONTH) 1,2,3,3+ month
SOCIALS othe assessment is quite subjective and therefore it does not fall into the first round of the assessment, because the bounty of the company are created with one of the goals - to increase activity in the social networks.
BOUNTY LIMIT yes/no
PRODUCT if there is a app, beta sites, etc it adds fat plus of the company.
TWO ROUND RATING: a rating at the end of two rounds of evaluation.
ICObench rating
The table also takes into account the rating of the same company from the site ICObench, for comparison.
ICO BENCH
Other useful information in the table:
BOUNTY START DATE: date of the company's bounty addition to the forum.
BOUNTY END DATE: the end date of the company's bounty.
[ANN]: a corresponding theme with the announcements on the forum
[BOUNTY]: appropriate theme with bounty on forum
MANAGER: Manager on forum, either the reference Site or Telegram
TOKEN: token name
TOKEN NUMBER: number of tokens allocated to the bounty company
TOKEN COST: the value of the token at the time the ICO
ALL BUDGET: the total budget allocated to this bounty (in dollars)
The table also contains notes and links to the site, etc.
NOTES: these are the black triangles on the table cells, when hovering over the corresponding cell show more details.
RED[BAD]: not recommended to participate
YELLOW[MID]: the solution is ambiguous, we recommend if you do not pass the green company conditions
GREEN[GOOD]: recommended for participation
NAVY[BEST]: the best bounty
How to use them? - you can read it in the Telegraph UPDATE SOON
BOUNTY SPEADSHEET[FREE NOW]
Jump to: