Topic: Bounty Star is a Scammer (Read 654 times)

I don't think I understand. I thought the bounty being discussed on this topic, Bitcoin Future, has successfully being paid and distributed? The bounty manager themselves gave a TX ID for the payment.

Aside from that, we are actually emphasizing on his project that chitted the hunters by manipulating tokens to other strange wallet

It is very difficult for a bounty manager to handle the project but there are many managers who pay. But Bounty Star has not seen this manager make any payment till date. So these are the entire project team's control manager only manages the bounty.
But bounty star manager should avoid scam projects. Controlling the projects that will be successful. But instead of doing that scam projects are controlled by Bounty Star.

Avoid Scam Project Bounty Star Manager.

Creating a managing might not be the best solution because bounty hunters are still going to look for ways to cheat and abuse the system.
You can consider @holydarkness suggestion and at the end or maybe during the mid of the campaign you can go through the spreadsheet yourself (if you're not the one managing the sheet) and look for accounts that are registered but not active in the forum, like the ones provided by Op. So that they can be removed.

And you're correct about bounty hunters having and using alt accounts to participates in bounty campaign and that's the main reason why I had to stop hunting for bounty hunters alts because even if their account end up being neg-tagged it will only take them a couple of minutes to create new ones and continue with their cheating activity, so everything seems like a wasted effort to me.

If I may give my two cents, I think the best solution you can do right now is to handle the spredsheet yourself, it'll greatly limit the possibility of same incident to happen. A lot of bounty manager has this approach, I can name one or two BM who work alone, tackling all the weekly report and updating spreadsheet all by themselves.

I am not sure how busy you are with your real-world job, but suppose you have a hectic schedule and can only spare little time on bounty managing daily, perhaps you will want to make a rule where only you on the team that can add, remove, accept, and reject participants in the spreadsheet. If you have to outsource a spreadsheet manager, they can only input stake, count posts, and such, without control to adding or removing new participants.

I understand the situation, as it happened without a noticing of us as we were not concerned about the situation one can do and I hope you understand us too and look forward to our active escrowed and regular campaigns.

For future clarification about distribution issue if the question comes, we don't do anything without the permission of the project team like we don't distribute or release tokens for escrowed campaigns before the team agrees. And for regular campaign we just have the agreement of the team, if the project is dead we have nothing to do. We can just try to connect with the owner.


Yes, we are also looking for a solution and very concerned about the spam/scam issue. We are planning to develop a concept of not using google doc form anymore. We are developing an idea of building our own managing tool where users can be blacklisted, auto reject ghosted accounts using necessary api's and so on. In some previous campaign we already tried to use our beta application to reduce ghosted and fake accounts but it was not perfect thus we had to use hired people again. So, All we can say right now, pray for us and let us help to contribute something. Thank You

Just as the discussion is going on, the OP just came in with enough proof of more cheating accounts just as @Nwada001 has suspected and asked.

So what's your take on this issue?
Are you still going to pay all participants of your campaign the looted amount?
You might be very busy with other campaign management or probably with other Jobs, but still I will still suggest you go in the sheet you self and run a properly digging which you could have done earlier before now, to be sure of how much damage your hired sheet manager have done with funds allocation.

From the look of things there is also some possibilities of more accounts being find out on the sheet.

Ahh, forgive me, I misunderstood your post. I thought on the sentence I underlined, you were referring to OP and a counter-accusation, as in he did a poor work and using alts on your campaign.

I understand correctly you're saying and admitting that it's one of your team that cheated the participants and thus one of the concern here is valid? May I know your plan to prevent this same situation from happening --or currently happening, suppose you have an active campaign-- in the future?

To proof my claims the more, i decided to dig more further and i discover that most of the below names has not been active for a year, so how come about those high stakes given to them and how their names were able to enter the spreadsheet when i believe it just you and your spreadsheet manager has access to editing adds etc, also you claim that your spreadsheet manager may have alter with the spreadsheet, is it not your responsibility as a manager to maintain transparency by making sure stake are carefully allocated?.

below are more 12 proof of how you and your team manipulated the bounty hunters rewards by inputing below names in other to made away with almost all the bounty Allocation.   



1)  Forum Username: Sulfar15
Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/sulfar15-3242740
this username was last seen on December 26, 2022, 03:32:35 PM, when the bounty has not even started so how come he got the highest stakes
proof: https://imgur.com/jXdkxZd


2)   Forum Username: Johajon
Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/johajon-3450836
this username did not Submit POA, Registered or submitted any report since from day one of the bounty, so how come he got the highest stakes
proof: https://imgur.com/801mUIK



3)  Forum Username: Shadrboehm43
Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/shadrboehm43-3284378
this username was last seen on June 22, 2022, 06:29:51 PM, when the bounty has not even started so how come he got the highest stakes
Proof: https://imgur.com/iXbzlq3



4)  Forum Username: Time2time
Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/time2time-3484688
this username was last seen on December 11, 2022, 04:02:10 PM, when the bounty has not even started so how come he got the highest stakes
Proof: https://imgur.com/Tmirakg



5)  Forum Username: Skil7skil
Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/skil7skil-3425383
this username was last seen on August 10, 2022, 12:38:00 PM, when the bounty has not even started so how come he got the highest stakes
Proof; https://imgur.com/z97KboN



6)  Forum Username: momin1234
Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/momin1234-3494662
this username did not Submit POA, Registered or submitted any report since from day one of the bounty, how come he got the highest stakes
Proof: https://imgur.com/ahIXtAw



7)  Forum Username: Florin Andone
Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/florin-andone-3200848
it was on: March 04, 2023, 03:35:35 AM this username submitted his POA and has not for once submitted bounty report but was the highest stakes
Proof: https://imgur.com/mqMkzAL



  Forum Username: Tarek75
Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/tarek75-3412940
this username did not Submit POA, Registered or submitted any report since from day one of the bounty, how come he got the highest stakes
Proof: https://imgur.com/Sg19wf7



9)   Forum Username: windycolton90
Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/windycolton90-2630777
this username last post was on 24 Nevember 2022 and did not register the bounty so how come he got the highest stakes
Proof: https://imgur.com/undefined




10)   Forum Username: Kasun3538
Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/kasun3538-2867075
this username was last seen on January 17, 2023, 05:21:23 AM and did not submit POA nor register the bounty so how come he got the highest stakes
Proof: https://imgur.com/ZNto2et



11)   Forum Username: sohidulsk99
Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/sohidulsk99-2344846
this username was last seen on March 13, 2022, 04:29:37 PM, when the bounty has not even started so how come he got the highest stakes
Proof: https://imgur.com/mB7tlAB



12)  Forum Username: ranabilal059
Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/ranabilal059-2675727
this username was last seen on September 06, 2022, 04:14:21 PM, when the bounty has not even started so how come he got the highest stakes
Proof: https://imgur.com/l4EkBCW

What can I do now? What you're wanting actually, Be more straight forward. It seems same questions again and again. I've answered that previously, Please take a look carefully.


As I can understand the common mistakes of a BM

- Updating stake
- Not updating stake
- Successfully distribute
- Failed to distribute

There is type of people who always spams. If they received payment, starts asking why it’s low amount and if not received then BM is scammer.

Some participants spams that normally in regular basis.

To be fair, only four out of six users mentioned by OP is not registered, yashmahfuj1200, kenaz198, INMYROOM, and dammyzee1, the other three has an PoA history. Unfortunately, the tabs on their spreadsheet did not list each participants' address, it's only shown on a dedicated tab, without username, alongside the amount dued on each campaign for each wallet instead of the sum of every campaign gained by an user, so we can't exactly know which address is belonged to who.

I take a time to look at the archived spreadsheet for yashmahfuj1200, they're rewarded as follows:

• Twitter: 14.5799
• Telegram: 14.8182
• Article: 68.9530
• Tiktok: 44.0314
• Total: 142.3825 with probably some rounding error

An interesting thing to point out, such amount was not listed on the "distribution" page, however one transaction on the payment proof that BM provided shows a transfer 142.3826 to an address, 0xb1...55c8, that's never enrolled on the campaign --at least that's what I get from a quick search-- but somehow still listed on the distribution page with amount dued 14.8182 --not 142.3826-- and nothing more. A little bit curious about this.

Next, I take a look at INMYROOM and dammyzee1:

• Twitter: 17.4959
• Telegram: 17.7819
• Article: 68.9530
• Tiktok: 55.0393
• Total: 159.2701

• Twitter: 17.4959
• Telegram: 17.7819
• Article: 68.9530
• Tiktok: 55.0393
• Total: 159.2701

the number did not show on the distribution page or at bscscan for both account.

Do that mean bounty star caught the cheaters and cancel their payment prior to sending them to every eligible participants? Probably. Do that mean bounty star split them and made them lost in between that nameless-address-only distribution tab? Also probable. But I sure as hell am not interested on labelling each address on that tab with each participants just to find out what address(es) stand out from another. Anyone interested is welcome to do it, though.

As for kenaz198,

• Twitter: 17.4959
• Telegram: 17.7819
• Article: 68.9530
• Tiktok: 55.0393
• Youtube: 84.9090
• Total: 244.1791

the amount he got, 244.1791, is shared with 16 other people. Like above, I find little to no interest on tracking all these address to connect them with each participants. Maybe later, if I'm feeling bored and have some free time at hand, maybe I won't, but certainly I am not doing it now.

One thing that I am more interested to know about is how these three addresses ends up on the spreadsheet. Bounty Star, correct me if I'm wrong, the only people who has access to add, edit, or delete entries on that spreadsheet is you and your spreadsheet manager, correct? And both of you input entries into the spreadsheet based on the data submitted by participants? So how come --at least-- four accounts that never enrolled, didn't post a PoA on your bounty thread, ends up in your spreadsheet? Some was never heard of on this thread for years, even. How could such mistake happened?

And that is the main purpose of this thread. Not about reimbursement or you paying the difference of what participant should get. It's about your credibility and the assumption that you deliberately input entries based on non-existent participants so you can take a portion the bounty allocation to your own pocket... at least that's what we want to know. I think OP only interested on stirring the pot, as they never came back after posting here.

While for the proof that you asked, OP had already give it on the opening post, it is proven that four entries on your spreadsheet are not based on a real enrollment, so now it's your time to give your proof.

Every manager need to face it. Even bounty hunters uses alts which is not possible for a manager to trace perfectly as the responsibility is given to the sheet manager,

We didn't necessarily dive deep to check whether data is 100% accurate or not as never thought of this type of traceless alts.

I've already asking for the proof from OP on my previous post. He is not active anymore after creating this topic and I hope you don’t believe a random word and will not blame anyone without proof. 
And previously I said, "I believe it will not be much amount." Cause almost all participants are happy with the amount of payment.

We will pay the participants who didn't receive fair amount for those alt if it’s the main purpose of this topic, that is the better way of this issue from our side.

It depends on participants, It’s not possible for anyone to pay if accused much more alt. And it’s also possible that there is no more alt without those

At least you have admitted that those profiles were eventually not active, and as such, the OP's accusations are, to some point, right. 

Even the four (4) accounts listed by the OP are completely using a different wallet, which those users have never used before in this forum. 

Aside from that, you as the overall bounty manager are you not supposed to be checking the progress of the work and how correct the data that are input are?
Talking about paying off the 5–6 accounts listed by the OP from your management fee, how sure are we that there are no more accounts yet to be figured out that fall under this same category? Probably the sheet manager might have added enough alt accounts to eventually make away with the 80% claim by the OP? 
If you are to pay off those accounts, to whom are you paying it?
What if more accounts are discovered again? Will you also take the blame and pay off for those accounts as well?

He directly said without any proof, According his finding (research) We stolen 80% of allocation. So I would be happy if he share the proof of that 80% allocation.

And according to this complaint, I can see he shared some accounts that are really inactive. Actually this spreadsheet is managed by our sheet manager. It seems, he did not work carefully or it is his alt. We should have been aware of this beforehand, so I'm not avoiding our fault.

Now, I would like to know what can we do at this situation.
I believe it will not be much amount.  So if a participant wants to take their reward which is reduced for those 5-6 accounts, we can pay it from our salary of the next campaign. I think that's the highest we can offer.

If I understand the OP correctly, his accusations weren't directly that you took out 80% of the total allocation straight to your pocket, but that you used your alt accounts or other random dead accounts from the forum, which are not active at all in any way, and those accounts were added by the management (anyone who has access to the spreadsheet) a few days before the distribution was to happen, and these few names added were never on the campaign from the start, no link to proof of registration, no report link. But the listed names happen to have the highest stake in the campaign and receive the highest pay. 

So I believe the OP means you used those accounts to collect those funds from the campaign to avoid any trace. So even if the transaction is being checked, all that can be found there are wallets that receive funds, and we don't know who is actually the owner of those wallets. 

Sorry for late response. Yes, I agreed with that neutral trust. We failed to catch the fake participants properly at this time. Recently, the scammers and spammers increased hugely. And requesting to consider that, I am already aware of that.

But I completely deny that we have stolen the allocation.
OP randomly said"80% of the bounty Allocation stolen by Bounty Star (us)" So
I want to invite to check the TXID of distribution- https://bscscan.com/tx/0x56152269bdac1174b98fa69d3a980d0d7d066ace0114fba9ac2dd63ca0879215

I hope everyone believes that the current situation of bounty is not that good. Many managers and participants came and made and making it shitty. That's why I said, we won't oppose the decision to remove the entire bounty board from BitcoinTalk if the day really come.

There are still someone who dream to live in crypto. We already built a free to use decentralize app platform where various crypto solution tools would be available. Currently we are working on building optimistic multisender - https://starsverse.app/  Normally, it will cost less transaction fess and have plan to make an official documentation on production. And more products are loading which needs time as we are doing using our pocket. And we choose management to introduce us with some crypto related people. There are many facilities in this profession, We can easily complete the introduction part with some great agency, founder, advisor, etc even with exchanges

I condemn that,  it’s very easy to say anyone scammer. Without thinking 2nd time without any confirmation he just set the title bounty star scammer.


Edit-
What do you want to say actually, Yes there are hurry cause allocation in USD and we are already holding the tokens. There are possibility to reduce token price and if reduce it can't meet the allocation of $15k USD.  We finalised spreadsheet after end of campaign, Even We've give them chance to complain about missing stakes- https://t.me/bountystar/36060

Do something meaningful.

I am giving them a generous benefits of doubt and would like to consider the silence was due to a workload because they're finalizing one campaign... or so, from what I perceive by glancing at their group chat, instead of deliberate action. A chat to their group --effectively-- informing all of the admins about the existence of this thread has been sent.

from what Cantsay posted, it's obvious that he ^{Bounty Star} doesn't care much about this forum or understand its value. For him, this forum is just a source of bounty hunters to justify in front of his employers that he was still doing something. A neutral or even negative tag won't change anything, because he doesn't care.
Unfortunately, neither the bounty hunters nor their employers seem to pay attention to such warnings. I guess they think that creating cheap but useless noise on social networks is a good thing.

Unfortunately there's still no change or development from my side, the admin of bounty star haven't replied to my chat or even read them, will probably try to reach them again through the group chat later today.



While for their message you screenshotted, I think that's not what they tried to say and you misinterpret it. They were not saying they are letting go and hiring four different people in a row, they're saying that they have to change the spreadsheet four times during the duration of certain bounty because people keep asking for revision, changing their database --I think most likely they're referring to address--, complaining for missing stakes, etc., which they consider as something they can't afford to keep on going and keep "compromise with the rules" because it's participant's responsibility to keep the data being submitted "clean" --worth mentioning that the rules of no address change is applied by many BM--, hence the new set of rules below the paragraph stating that no data may be changed after initial submission, complain will only be handled by the end of the bounty and no more late submission.

there's no problem with hiring someone to manage the spreadsheet. but now he will be more careful to choose someone more professional in work. because mistakes were made under his management, of course, BM had to suffer the consequences.

and I hope that some people's suspicions about BM are not true. that the accounts are alt from BM and intentionally included in the campaign. because he has published several campaign bounties, and it might also happen in his other campaigns.

It's been a few days since you contacted bounty star about this thread, and I believe he saw your message and deliberately chose to ignore the thread because when I went to his group chat, I saw a post he made a day after you contacted him (the image of the post is below), or perhaps he reached out to you explaining why he still hasn't replied?




According to the post, he hired someone to work on his campaign spreadsheet, and from the looks of it, the person is not doing a good job, but it won't hurt him to come to this thread to clear the issue because having a neutral tag about how poorly he manages his campaign (which is true) will definitely affect his business.

Came to my mind, I don't think OP ever invited the other party or at least let them know about this situation. Since Bounty Star's last online time --as per this post was made-- was few hours before this thread being published, I don't think they're aware about this reputation thread, nor realized the neutral feedback left on their profile.

OP, Salahmu, it will always be wise and a nice gesture, and well advised, if you invite the opposite party of your case --be it a reputation or scam accusation-- so they can get a chance to explain from their side. And from that point, we can conclude what happened.

Bounty Star was invited and notified.

This is something very interesting to see. Most of bounty star projects has not paid to users and checking of spreadsheet is very slow. i remembered last Escrowed Bounty he managed and taken more than two weeks in checking and finalizing spreadsheet. In mentioned bounty (Bitcoin future) He finalized bounty in 12 hours after bounty end and payment made instantly.

in above case there are two possible scenario. first one is that some scammer may be filled form without Proof of authentication post but in this case question is why bounty manager given stake to these users and did not rejected. second scenario is that mentioned by OP that bounty star entered own accounts to get maximum token because token already listed and price was also good. in this case BM account should be tag for fraudulent.
o

so it is possible that BM is using his account alt to participate in his own campaign. even without registering in the thread and without doing any work, the accounts still get stakes every week. but there is no proof of such a connection yet.
I once traced the transaction address of a bounty cheater. and that led to the case a few years ago. if in the future this BM case might all be revealed, the case might be like the Kakatua Bounty Manager With His 41 Altaccounts!

Anything that has to do with scam can come in with any format or in any dimension, but one thing i believe about those bounty hunters is that they don't take time to read the rules behind bounty campaigns before proving smart, there's no any level of smartness that can override the rules laid down on the forum concerning bounties, i believe he wouldn't use other's people's account randomly without having a connection with those accounts.

To be fair, a person can enter anyone's info when they fill out the google form. There's no verifying before they can enter a username or a link. I remember a few bounties where some scammer had entered a bunch of high ranking names on the forum at the time. I messaged a couple because I was pretty sure they didn't participate in bounties and found that I was correct.

As a manager you sort of need some help from users in finding cheaters. You also have to check the work and look out for duplicate entries who just gave a different forum name. There are all kinds of cheaters in bounties period.

100% correct. You cannot control if someone used your name and account link. You also cannot be punished for something on a spreadsheet unless it can be linked to you 100% and you were cheating a bounty.

Just in case someone enter my account information on the spreadsheet, are you suggesting others to tag my account?

Let me know what should I do in my defense if such thing happen.

Did I make a point ?

Is there anyway those accounts could be pernalized or bounty scammer randomly picked those accounts from unknown user and then fixed their wallet? Or could it be those accounts are related to one user alone?
Maybe those accounts should be tag.

Archiving the spreadsheet in case the said BM edited the content and/or locked it for private access only.

---

I can't see anywhere on yahoo's post that sounded like he saw nothing wrong with what the BM did. He even made himself and the purpose of his post clear on the last part of it.

I have just gone through the bounty thread and I noticed it was $15k worth of the token not directly $15k that is awarded to the campaign, so to me at this price may varies. Down to escrowed funds only 300 pieces of their tokens was escrowed with him meaning, 300 token is worth $15k at the time of sending to him this may be true or false it was based on what I found out from the bounty thread.

Now let me clear you something you don't know very clearly about project owners, they will give you a fake token price in other to release little percentage of their tokens mainwhile at the list period it will worth zero whereby anyone who participated in the campaign may not get at least 1$ after the campaign ends or even if at all the campaign will get listed in an exchange before you possibly trade to get something out of it.

Keep in mind that before any campaign is being launched there are some certain rules and regulations that managers always fix in other for hunters to abide to it. So if in a way you couldn't abide to his rules and you got messed up doesn't mean he should called scammer, then lastly I know what it takes to manage a project it's very difficult to fetch out all fake entries though it is the managers fault not to get a credible hands to work with him to fetch out all those people with fake entries, as a matter of fact hunters are the most difficult people to handle.

NB: I am not siding on bountystar nor even siding for you but I am only giving my statement based on how difficulty it's to handle bounty's. However if you had any issues or complaint you should better pm to query him as to know why such thing happened maybe he would get those accounts phished out from the campaign. Btw is this your alt account because you refused to use your main account to create this accusations lol 😂.

Are you all there in the head? Seriously, you should read a post and comprehend its meaning before putting some bs spam post. You want to make a comment, that's fine. Just stay on topic and throw shade where it belongs.

I am arguing the fact that people think managers are paid well. They're usually not. Then I'm saying that likely the names in the sheet are prob his alts or bs so that he can collect more money.

Most of these bounty managers are shitheads that are just looking for opportunities to scam people IMO.

Lol, perhaps he didn't go through the content of the post to understand but jump down to made a comment 
Okay fine, let us all agree he wasn't paid well thou that's never an excuse to temper with hunter's reward. Nobody will force you to accept their offer. One can politely decline the job if the pay is too poor. He accepted whatever offer made by the project team and its possible they've paid him so why smuggling names in the spreadsheet for personal gains? Your comment sounds like you see nothing wrong with what the manager did. You're also a manager and you know that singular act is unprofessional. Most of the campaigns prohibits any form of cheating, why the manager himself engaged in cheating? Very detestable from a manager. Such managers can not be trusted.

All of your accusations aside, the manager likely was NOT paid handsomely for posting and managing the bounty. Companies usually pay shit and hire the cheapest manager when it comes to bounties. So, if he was handed 15k to spread out among hunters, it might be enough for him to scam and take a load of it for himself.

I'm not saying they did scam and steal, i'm just letting you know it is possible.

Even though some of those name that you claimed never made "proof of authentification" post actually did it (Urmi3, ARNI4), there is definitely something fishy going on as how can accounts that didn't even registered in the bounty get stakes, or accounts that were active last time months before bounty campaign even started. In the best possible scenario bounty manager is completely incompetent and managed to get tricked by bounty scammers while more probably scenario is that he simply inserted those accounts in order to get some free tokens.

Btw, have you confronted him about all this and if yes, what was his answer?


Point of his post is not to make connections between those accounts, but rather to say that bounty manager inserted those accounts and gave them stakes even though they didn't participate in bounty campaign. And he managed to prove that some of those accounts weren't even active for ~5 months yet they managed to get stakes of bounty that started month ago.


Of course this is his alt account but what matters more than him coming on his main account is here is whether what he claims is true.

All of us here can see and accept any allegations of Alt Accounts being involved in extramarital affairs in the Bounty campaign, based on valid evidence of your accusations, not speculation, if you respond the account above is a fraudulent Alt account in the BITCOIN FUTURE campaign managed by: @Bounty Star, you can tell him directly the account you suspect.

Notes:
We here don't see anything strange about the account above, I don't know what we see with the account above. Can you give clear instructions for us, regarding the accounts above, involvement and connection between each other.

OP, I'm pretty sure, this topic you made, must be your Alt account, you are hiding behind the scenes, if you are professional enough, make accusations with your main account, we will respect that, if your main account is playing behind all this.

Op, I will advise that you move your post to "reputation board" so that others can analyse your proofs, because this is not the right place to post it.
And you can move the thread yourself by clicking on "move topic" button at the left bottom corner of this thread and then select the preferred board which is reputation board.

hello everyone, an issue was brought to my notice by a friend concerning a Bounty manager called "
Bounty Star" he brought a bounty called "BITCOIN FUTURE", from my findings it was stated that the bounty was ESCROWED to him by the project owner which was $15K to pay the hunters after project ends. so from my findings the bounty started on February 12, 2023, 04:00:32 AM and lasted for six weeks which 26 March was the last day but the the total number of stakes was calculated and finalized on 25 march.

on that finalized spreadsheet the Article, Tiktok was just only 1 stakes per accepted hunters but to my greatest surprise some strange names whom did not participate on the bounty was inputted by Bounty Star and was given 5 and 4 sakes, so i was i very curious to know how come about those names so i decided to track those names listed bellow:


1) Bitcointalk Username: Urmi3
from my findings this name did not register or submitted a report  on the ''BITCOIN FUTURE'' bounty but was given the highest stakes
here is his profile link you can scroll to verify my claim.: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/urmi3-3480406
preadsheet proof: https://imgur.com/ySV6Dtv

2) Bitcointalk Username: GwenStacy
this Username again only submitted proof of Authentication on the bounty but did not report, and was given the highest stakes.
[https://imgur.com/6p7lc9z]
here is his profile link you can scroll to verify my claim.: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/gwenstacy-3460161
preadsheet proof: https://imgur.com/S7fHZY6


3) Bitcointalk Username: yashmahfuj1200
this Username was last seen on March 03, 2023, 09:51:20 AM and has not ever submitted any report but suddenly given the highest stakes
here is the proof of las seen on he forum: https://imgur.com/nLR82uc
here is his profile link you can scroll to verify my claim.: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/yashmahfuj1200-2788728
preadsheet proof: https://imgur.com/AJXDENH


4) Bitcointalk Username: kenaz198
this Username was not registered on the bounty and did not report, and was given the highest stakes.
here is his profile link you can scroll to verify my claim.: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/kenaz198-145178
preadsheet proof: https://imgur.com/xyxYbCK


5) Bitcointalk Username: ARNI4
this Username was not registered on the bounty and did not report, and was given the highest stakes
here is his profile link you can scroll to verify my claim.: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/arni4-3534372
preadsheet proof: https://imgur.com/0PcePEZ


6) Bitcointalk Username: INMYROOM
This username was last seen on November 04, 2022, 04:31:52 AM
how come he was given the highest stake
here is proof: https://imgur.com/8j7zEyy
preadsheet proof: https://imgur.com/2XuuQcm


7) Bitcointalk Username: dammyzee1
This username was last seen on December 25, 2022, 12:24:56 PM
how come he was given the highest stake when the bounty started on February 12, 2023, 04:00:32 AM
Proof: https://imgur.com/Vv59Wu5
preadsheet proof: https://imgur.com/Keifo3f

There are still so many fake names and deferent wallet address on the spreadsheets but when they noticed the complaining of hunters they decided to hide the wallet addresses.

i believe Bounty Star was paid handsomely by the project owners, why then go for hunters reward, from my findings 80% of the bounty Allocation was stolen by Bounty Star and left with hunters nothing.

A friend told me they use his username on the spreadsheets and when he confronted them on the chart, they his message.
here was his message to them: https://imgur.com/57l6upj

here is bounty spreadsheet : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qeMswjPPtRL1B2ggTB8yCvX5YBuK4Z1g7O9WhSvUA7o/edit?usp=drivesdk

and here is the bounty: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bounty-bitcoin-future-15000-worth-of-btcf-will-be-shared-5439538


I was very sad when a complained to me about this scam, i was compel to open this thread for you guys check and air your opinion on this unjust act.  thank you.