Topic: #breaking Michael Avenatti arrested (report) (Read 15678 times)

Yea, cable TV news shows were only bringing him on because of what he was saying, not his expertise in anything.

When he was making his daily news appearances, he was likely already in trouble with the law, it just hadn't been public yet.

I think it would have been hilarious if he actually made it to any of the Democratic debates. He was really aggressive when he talked, and would have made the debates even more of a train wreck.

Oh no, how unfortunate.

Stormy Daniels has a poor taste in lawyers (and men).

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/387325-michael-avenatti-has-appeared-on-cnn-and-msnbc-108-times-since-march-7-says

Remember when the media gave this clown over a hundred TV appearances because he spouted the right lines against Trump? And somehow, he was a credible source for his allegations against Brett Kavanaugh when he represented a client that claimed she was raped by him (which was false, btw). How the mighty has fallen.

Avenatti was apparently just sentenced to 2.5 years in prison for his extortion scheme and according to some reports was crying when he heard the sentence.

Does this mean we have a new democrat frontrunner for president? (Avenatti was found guilty of 3 felonies today)

Probably she would be looking pretty attractive ... to those in prison.

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/creepy-porn-lawyer-avenatti-found-guilty-all-charges-extorting-nike

You mean down in the big house they're going to put a blonde wig on him before they bend him over?

There is a picture of her with Trump in 2006, she was not attractive in that picture.

Based on the charges he is facing, I don't see Avenatti ever working as a lawyer, or possibly professionally again. He might get a book deal, but depending on the specific circumstances, he might not see that money depending on the specific circumstances regarding what his book is about and the charges surrounding his relationship with Daniels.

She isn't that attractive. Maybe 10 years ago (maybe). I would be more worried about what they think of sleazy lawyers if I were him lol.

I wonder how an attorney that stole money from a hot babe of a porn star would be treated in prison.

He has been charged with *more* crimes regarding money owed to Stormy Daniels.

This is perfectly fine, and even advantageous. Democrats like bad-boy candidates. These arrests and charges are features not bugs.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/25/michael-avenatti-to-be-charged-with-wire-and-bank-fraud.html

It looks like he is arrested again (or will likely will be in the near future) on charges relating to extortion

More bad news out of the Avenatti camp this morning. Stormy Daniels has accused him of foul play.

The charges were not dropped, the DA declined to bring felony charges based on the evidence. This is far from evidence of Creepy Porn Lawyer's proof of innocence.

1 - I don't think there is any evidence that Wohl was behind Avenatti's arrest. I haven't seen any.

The fact that the victim was Avenatti's (ex) girlfriend instead of his ex wife, as briefly reported by TMZ is not going to give Avenatti a cause of action for libel. This discrepancy would only have a nominal impact on his reputation. The reporting that Avenatti said "she hit me first" when he was in the apartment building is most damaging to his reputation, and to my knowledge, this has not been refuted by Avenatti.

Avennatti is already known to be a porn lawyer and at that may be involve in some acts that may contradict the domestic law of the land, may be he will get himself out of this and move on with contesting for his election. But I don't think the arrest has any thing to do with his politics except if being convicted by the legal system.

But you may be one of the "old style Democrats."

You know, one who understand what they meant and stood for about thirty microseconds ago.

Pleas absolve yourself of this sin and get with the program.

https://www.newsweek.com/michael-avenatti-calls-jacob-wohl-complete-fraud-who-should-be-incarcerated-1229016

I wonder if Jacob Wohl will be accountable for slander laws.

Surefire Intelligence is such an oxymoron company name; might as well be Surefire Ignorance.

But I so want him to run for Prez!

You are literally just making up quotes now and claiming I said them. Really convincing. The caps and oversized letters are a nice touch too. He is still under investigation. Come on you guys LOVE investigations right?

Ahaha. The charges were dropped in LA.

Now the case will probably pick up somewhere else when his law firm sues some poor Estonian actress who was paid off.

The problem is the sheep are too blind to follow this ruthless attack by CONSERVATIVES and their like.

When justice prevails, which I think it will, we'll see that this was a whole setup by a certain group who wanted to have the "actress girlfriend" make a scene "for a movie".

I'm willing to guess the charges were submitted entirely falsify ("i didn't actually report him, wtf - actress!!!").

The lawsuit will go to find out who actually reported and will lead nowhere, thanks "government".

Woo! Wanna take bets on how it'll play out?? Cause so far, I'm up a ton on predicting "eventualities" of events from GOP operations. Take a look at Mueller's "setup". Rofl.

I think TMZ is going to have to issue a direct retraction "these events were fake" somewhere eventually. The lawsuit won't really go anywhere, but he'll be proven innocent.

CONSPITARDS a decade from now will find this and use it AS ABSOLUTE PROOF he's gulity of a crime, because he was charged with the crime.

People like TECSHARE throw out "HE'S GUILTY BECAUSE THEY'RE MOVING THE CASE SOMEWHERE ELSE" when the article clearly states he's not being tried by them.


If you look at his side at this point in history, he knows there's tapes that disprove the "supposed" incidence, and the cops seized the tapes; he wants the tapes out in the public ASAP to show he's entirely innocent from this accusation. At this point, we're just waiting for that evidence to become public record to "definitely prove" that the accusations are FABRICATED.

You have serious problems with logic and reading comprehension.

"A spokeswoman for the district attorney would not say why prosecutors declined to take the case from Los Angeles police. Documents supporting the decision were not released because the case was referred to the city attorney and was still under investigation.

The city attorney’s office will review the case, a spokesman said."

The charges aren't fake, they are being referred to another jurisdiction. As your source clearly states it is still under investigation.

https://apnews.com/71d38227507640e796d0db0b9256f038

Fake charges.

I can't believe the right would use a paid actor to accuse an innocent individual. Absolutely disgusting behavior playing faux victims.


There's a reason he's not investigation; there's tapes. Rofl.

Um, yea, that’s not true.

Creepy Porn Lawyer is under investigation for multiple ethical issues by the Bar. He is under investigation by law enforcement for perjury related issues.

On its face, he has taken actions that were not in the best interest of his client but would benefit him.

I am fairly confident there are other issues that I can’t think of right now.

Blue certainly does have a fixation on sucking trump's cock. I remain puzzled by the use of a homophobic slur by a rabid running dog of the left.

Quoting for posterity, since no one else took a full quote. Wouldn't want it edited out later right?

  OMG, if he won the nomination, I think an epiphany on my part will come in short order. When I was a child, my favorite color was red.

Look, be fair. It's okay if he wants to run. Really it is.

Avenatti? He's a clown.

Avenatti? That guy's just a clown.

I heard Avenatti is running for President.
I thought he was running as a joke.

Judge affirms order evicting Michael Avenatti’s law practice from office in Newport Beach www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-avenatti-eviction-20181116-story.html

Nobody should be surprised that a person like Avenatti would get caught up like this. So many examples of double standards these days. People blindly defending him are outing themselves as sheep.

As far as I'm aware, the GOP lost majority in the senate to approve federal judges now that a GOP senate member has pledged to no longer approve appointing Trump nominations due to the whole Whitaker thing.

I think we're starting to see the collapse of the Republican party on that front.

On this front, it'll be interesting to see who the accuser is and watch their testimony. Hopefully this case doesn't end in a private settlement, but becomes public record for everyone to see.

Until more information is available, all we can do is make wild guesses.

Unfortunately, those assholes are the ones who can nominate and approve federal court judges for the foreseeable future. Hopefully, they won't invoke much more damage on our "robust justice system" before all is said in done. Fortunately, in Avenatti's case, it will be done through the local courts. So the federal courts likely will not get involved.

Luckily, we have a fairly robust justice system, so even when assholes refuse to step down, they'll still be held accountable.

I really wish Russia would leak the hacked GOP details. That's gonna cause a media frenzy; I do wonder how many rapist/sexual assault GOP members will step down then.

Also, I didn't know you were a snowflake that's offended so easily, buck up buttercup.

Yes, that would make me really happy if Trump and half the GOP resigned. Al Franken did the right thing. 

PS: You do know the term "retarded" is not approved by the PC police.

I mean, following your logic, half the GOP and Trump needs to resign instantly if you want to set your own (retarded) standard.

Luckily, we already have a legal justice system for the standard here in America

What kind of "investigation" was conducted on Al Franken before he resigned? If we are going to set standards, then so be it. But we must not make them double standards. Avenatti needs to go on a leave from his lawyer duties until this matter is resolved. He should have quite a bit of money saved up from the boatload of cash he has made. If not, he can write a book. I'm sure he can make quite a bit that way.  


I happen to be a registered Democrat, who usually votes the party line. Don't put me in a box of "they." 

It makes sense, they are probably just mad because liberals often use the ''guilty until proven innocent'' argument.

This false equivalency argument is getting annoying as shit. READ MY FUCKING POSTS BEFORE RESPONDING WITH YOUR BULLSHIT.

I'm saying THIS SUBJECT DOES NEED INVESTIGATION. How more clear can that fucking be? Are you just willfully ignoring what I'm saying to propagate your own reality?

Whatever happened to #metoo? Aren't women supposed to be believed? Or does that only apply to conservative supreme court justices? Al Franken resigned on very minor allegations when compared to this. Or does #metoo only apply to sexual abuse and knocking a woman around needs to go through the whole due process bit?

I'm not defending this individual. I'm saying that this individual is calling for an investigation into the matter. I'm supporting said investigation as it's part of the normal legal system.

I don't understand individuals are having issues understanding that.

Why are you defending this person?  Just because this lawyer represented someone who could bring up a sexual scandal against Trump? (and later Kavanaugh?) Quite frankly, I don't care what the president does sexually, if it is between two consenting parties. I guess the hush money is of some concern, but Stormy broke the agreement so she could obviously cash in for more. I really don't care for this guy. If he runs for president, I won't vote for him. I'll vote for a libertarian candidate before checking a box by this fool's name.  At least the libertarians have it about half right.

The kettle calling the pot black right there.

Weren't you one of the people the enjoy sucking trump's cock? Cause I'm pretty sure you do that in every thread regardless of the topic.

Avenatti respects the legal system unlike others.

A suspect can deny gravity if they want, they are free to, that doesn't make gravity go away or change. Also denying charges is not equivalent to rejecting the entire judicial process. Also, weren't you people fond of saying over and over again "this is not a criminal investigation, it is a job interview?" So which is it?

Ahaha, funny you can't read an argument. An individual has the right to deny an allegation. They don't have a right to deny the entire justice process because they're wrongfully accused.

I know this shit's complicated, but law and justice and all, but I figured you'd understand by now. But nah, you're too busy misinterpreting the arguments to make yourself feel better about everything

Yeah, how dare people defend themselves right? What do they think this is America? The legitimate thing to do when some one accuses you is to lay down and die while the world executes your character.

I know you have problems reading... but didn't know you had issues with logical operators too.

I've gone ahead and bolded the part you missed. If you want, I can make this size 50 font and red too for your blind eyes.

Avenatti repeatedly denied doing this...

Nah, I was strongly against individuals denying any wrongdoing while also criticizing the investigation into them.

"Nothing to hide, nothing to fear" sort of logic there.

But there's been so many false "facts" thrown around so far due to media reporting on this investigation (story changed twice now), I'm pretty sure no one has a clue what's actually going on.

It is strange to see someone like you to advocate to wait for the facts to come out. I could have sworn that you used to be strongly against that.

At least Avenatti doesn't sit behind a fake company using his mother's cell phone as the primary contact. Rofl.

That knife cuts both ways, dude.

Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/michael-avenatti-appears-blame-jacob-wohl-domestic-violence-arrest-n936571

The difference between an innocent and guilty individual is bolded. When you're innocent, you know the investigation will come up short. Unlike Trump and the other dirty individuals who work to stall and criticize the investigations into their corrupt past.

Gonna be funny when Jacob Wohl sits behind bars for conspiracy to make fraudulent charges.

No, certainly not when it's in his political interests and aspirations to deny someone their due process.  None the less, he's entitled to the same protections under the same law he would deny others.


I believe you're correct, LA not Los Vegas. 

Hope that this bit of news gets this clown to fade away. I can't stand this guy nor the client that propelled this creep to the limelight.

Does he even believe in giving people the benefit of the doubt?

His ex-wife has someone of a conflict of interest as if he cannot earn a living, she wont receive (as much) alimony. It also appears he is (has) going through a pretty nasty divorce, and if some of what has been said about what he did is true, I don't think it would be entirely unreasonable for a situation to escalate into DV.

I believe it is actually Los Angelos.

Lets give him the benefit of the doubt, it's only alleged.  And his ex wive has come out in his defense, for what that's worth...

However, the Las Vegas sheriff's office has confirmed he's in the jail house now.

''and is planning on running for President in 2020 as a democrat'' ROFL

I don't know how anyone can believe that lying bastard, you only have to watch one of his interviews about his supposed witnesses, fucking moron.

According to a report that was first reported by tmz, Michael Avenatti aka the Creepy Porn Lawyer has been arrested on Domestic Violence charges.

According to TMZ's sources, Avenatti was involved in possibly two Domestic Violence incidents, one yesterday, and one today.

Avenatti represents porn star Stormy Daniels and is planning on running for President in 2020 as a democrat. If Avenatti really was involved in multiple DV incidents, he should fit right in at the DNC, based on some of the people Democrats have stood behind this recent election cycle.

Avenatti also was pushing a narrative, that IMO, was false on its face, that now Justice Kavanaugh was involved in multiple gang rape parties in high school in the 1980s. I wonder if he will advocate to receive the same standard of due process himself that he was pushing for Justice Kavanaugh to receive.

I am curious to know if this will derail or enhance his chances of getting the Presidential nomination from the Democratic party, and if this will impact his ability to practice law in CA (and elsewhere).