Author

Topic: Brexit news - The UK may have left the EU (Read 237 times)

sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325
April 03, 2019, 02:24:37 PM
#29
The LBMA good delivery list is the foundation of much of the International settlements using gold, I just cited that as a small example. If you don't think that control of this represents massive financial power, then it may be worth doing some research.

And that's about a contract, that has nothing to do with the City of London's "spooky" autonomy


This is just one of the tools they have created. Couple that with the purchase of politicians in Washington, Westminster and the EU, and you can get some idea of the control exercised over much of the Western World.

Stick with that sort of thing. City of London companies almost certainly do bribe UK politicians, you now sound credible

(but no evidence I am aware of has ever linked City of London with bribery of EU or US politicians, where is the evidence? You need evidence, or you look crazy)

city of london is biggest welfare recipent of europe, time to cut it off,

you know whats going to happen?

entire city of london will spam all of telegram with crypto ICOs,
legendary
Activity: 3430
Merit: 3080
The LBMA good delivery list is the foundation of much of the International settlements using gold, I just cited that as a small example. If you don't think that control of this represents massive financial power, then it may be worth doing some research.

And that's about a contract, that has nothing to do with the City of London's "spooky" autonomy


This is just one of the tools they have created. Couple that with the purchase of politicians in Washington, Westminster and the EU, and you can get some idea of the control exercised over much of the Western World.

Stick with that sort of thing. City of London companies almost certainly do bribe UK politicians, you now sound credible

(but no evidence I am aware of has ever linked City of London with bribery of EU or US politicians, where is the evidence? You need evidence, or you look crazy)
legendary
Activity: 2814
Merit: 2472
https://JetCash.com
The LBMA good delivery list is the foundation of much of the International settlements using gold, I just cited that as a small example. If you don't think that control of this represents massive financial power, then it may be worth doing some research. This is just one of the tools they have created. Couple that with the purchase of politicians in Washington, Westminster and the EU, and you can get some idea of the control exercised over much of the Western World.
legendary
Activity: 3430
Merit: 3080
Here is one example of the power of the City of London - http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list

And that's got nothing to do with City of London's autonomy or legal powers

Most people haven't hear of the LBMA good delivery list, but it allows for the exchange of gold bars at the international level, and it is meant to avoid constant assaying. LIBOR is yet another way the City controls world finance. The LBMA good delivery list is current under appraisal, as the tungsten filled bars bought by China from Fort Knox was supposed to be guaranteed as pure. Some organisation has got at the bars and created gold plated tungsten bars to replace the pure ones. Some people estimate that as much as 40% of the bars used for international settlement could be forged. It is extremely difficult to find out any information, as the asset values involved are astronomical, and disclosure of irregularities could cause massive waves in the banking system.

Where is the extraordinary evidence to back your extraordinary claims?

If you care about corruption in the City of London, you are doing the worst thing possible to combat it. If you make fantastic claims with zero evidence, you look crazy

Meanwhile, people working in the City of London, and all over British territories, are commiting apalling acts for which acutal evidence does exist
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325
It would appear the the Soros funded action by Gina Miller which forced a ruling that the triggering of article 50 required Royal assent for a statute. This means that any revocation or variance would also require such a statute to be passed through parliament. This was not done, and it is obviously too late to start the process. Under international law and English law, it would appear that the UK is no longer a member of the EU. I understand a suitable High Court action has been started, and it will be interesting to see how that is fought, and the results.

As far as I know, UK is still member of EU, at least until April 12.
Until that day UK parliament should decide f they want to leave EU without agreement or ask for new delay but in that case they will have to particpate in the eU elections.
It seems there is no easy choices for UK now.

uk parliament are just a bunch of brainded zombies, they are using may as a negotiator that has all his arms and legs cut off, the moment uk leaving the EU will happen as soon as an inflation kicks and in mass shortages in all kinds of advanced goods occur, and also companies losing their ability to earn money from continental supply chains,

for example the mini car wont be produced in uk anymore and airbus will have to relocate his production back to the continent.

in europe brits will basically become what they had as the polish in uk

brits will become europes cheap labour source because the pound will become worthless.

at the same time there will be countless social clashes, because countless businesses wont be able to sell their stuff into the continent anymore and earn themselves an access to consumption capacities.

european manufacturers (airbus, bmw) did big mistakes when they invested into that idiotic islander population.

I agree that economy in UK may lose a lot in the case of Brexit without agreement but I don't believe it will be so catastrophic as you think.
UK will be forced to turn to new trading alliances and partners like BRICS countries, Asia, America and develop trade relations with them.
I believe that the UK will also seek new partnerships with the EU.


brits constantly distort reality it was even mentioned in cnn, uk is just a bunch of money printers, in foreign trade deficit, that consume, they dont have something to trade with, you wont get beneficial trade deals at all meaning no possible trade deals that give profit, you will sell for example 1 ton of wheat for 1 kg of chinese food for the uk elite. thats all. thats a destructive nonbeneficial trade deal. because no country wants to be dependent in its supply chains on others, uk shows unreliability as a partner to whole world with their egocentric and egoistic brexit. brits will become for next 2 generation plumbers in poland not the other way around

legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1824
It would appear the the Soros funded action by Gina Miller which forced a ruling that the triggering of article 50 required Royal assent for a statute. This means that any revocation or variance would also require such a statute to be passed through parliament. This was not done, and it is obviously too late to start the process. Under international law and English law, it would appear that the UK is no longer a member of the EU. I understand a suitable High Court action has been started, and it will be interesting to see how that is fought, and the results.

As far as I know, UK is still member of EU, at least until April 12.
Until that day UK parliament should decide f they want to leave EU without agreement or ask for new delay but in that case they will have to particpate in the eU elections.
It seems there is no easy choices for UK now.

uk parliament are just a bunch of brainded zombies, they are using may as a negotiator that has all his arms and legs cut off, the moment uk leaving the EU will happen as soon as an inflation kicks and in mass shortages in all kinds of advanced goods occur, and also companies losing their ability to earn money from continental supply chains,

for example the mini car wont be produced in uk anymore and airbus will have to relocate his production back to the continent.

in europe brits will basically become what they had as the polish in uk

brits will become europes cheap labour source because the pound will become worthless.

at the same time there will be countless social clashes, because countless businesses wont be able to sell their stuff into the continent anymore and earn themselves an access to consumption capacities.

european manufacturers (airbus, bmw) did big mistakes when they invested into that idiotic islander population.

I agree that economy in UK may lose a lot in the case of Brexit without agreement but I don't believe it will be so catastrophic as you think.
UK will be forced to turn to new trading alliances and partners like BRICS countries, Asia, America and develop trade relations with them.
I believe that the UK will also seek new partnerships with the EU.
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325


post brexit banknotes in uk Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325
It would appear the the Soros funded action by Gina Miller which forced a ruling that the triggering of article 50 required Royal assent for a statute. This means that any revocation or variance would also require such a statute to be passed through parliament. This was not done, and it is obviously too late to start the process. Under international law and English law, it would appear that the UK is no longer a member of the EU. I understand a suitable High Court action has been started, and it will be interesting to see how that is fought, and the results.

Hey according to what I have been reading in news it says UK has time till April 12th, and EU can give them some more time to wrap up the process. I’m failing to understand why can’t UK conduct a fresh referendum, and save itself from this disaster? Jetcash you’re from Uk is there no way that ordinary citizens can stop this, maybe dissolve the government conduct a fresh referendum and then stop this can you shed some insight about this.

i doubt the eu will be taken serious by europeans if they let the brits get away with a second referendum, sicing uk appart into multiple pieces and integrating them individually like jugoslawian countries is much safer, brits will forever then shut up on EU questions,
legendary
Activity: 2814
Merit: 2472
https://JetCash.com
You guys aren't reading my comment. The High Court action is based on the fact that the Gina Miller ruling stipulated that the treaty required a statute to be passed, and it had to receive Royal assent. This means that it can only be varied by a similar process. The Government failed to initiate this process, and therefore the widely publicised extension has no legal basis. Of course the Government will fight this, and with a Deep State controlled legal system, who knows what the outcome will be.

In fact there is another statute in the constitution, and this rules that a British government cannot bind its successors in an unbreakable treaty. This one is sitting in the background, and may surface if there is not a simpler way to get out of the EU. The EU is on its death bed, and the last thing it wants is a load of destructive and disruptive MEPS messing up its parliamentary procedures for the next 5 years. The sensible move would be for them to eject the UK. They have prepared for this, and there will not even be a need for a hard border in Ireland. There will be no disruption unless saboteurs create one artificially.
hero member
Activity: 2646
Merit: 686
It would appear the the Soros funded action by Gina Miller which forced a ruling that the triggering of article 50 required Royal assent for a statute. This means that any revocation or variance would also require such a statute to be passed through parliament. This was not done, and it is obviously too late to start the process. Under international law and English law, it would appear that the UK is no longer a member of the EU. I understand a suitable High Court action has been started, and it will be interesting to see how that is fought, and the results.

Hey according to what I have been reading in news it says UK has time till April 12th, and EU can give them some more time to wrap up the process. I’m failing to understand why can’t UK conduct a fresh referendum, and save itself from this disaster? Jetcash you’re from Uk is there no way that ordinary citizens can stop this, maybe dissolve the government conduct a fresh referendum and then stop this can you shed some insight about this.
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325
Here is one example of the power of the City of London - http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list

Most people haven't hear of the LBMA good delivery list, but it allows for the exchange of gold bars at the international level, and it is meant to avoid constant assaying. LIBOR is yet another way the City controls world finance. The LBMA good delivery list is current under appraisal, as the tungsten filled bars bought by China from Fort Knox was supposed to be guaranteed as pure. Some organisation has got at the bars and created gold plated tungsten bars to replace the pure ones. Some people estimate that as much as 40% of the bars used for international settlement could be forged. It is extremely difficult to find out any information, as the asset values involved are astronomical, and disclosure of irregularities could cause massive waves in the banking system.

I found an interview with Robin Tilbrook from 20th March. It's 18 minutes long, and it covers much of the legal background to the claim.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAMbqf-OrvE



city of london is not powerful,

they just can still print magically euro money, thats why uk is such a strange deindustrialised country, once the city of london is being exposed as the scam it is it will crush, and then can print only british pounds which no one in europe wants.

financial centre will move to frankfurt.
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325
There were a lot of factors why the UK left the European Union but I have read an article before that the EU is now trying to initiate the globalization. BREXIT or British exit argued that by reclaiming sovereignty, the UK would be better able to manage their immigration, free itself enormous regulations and start more dynamic growth.

If you want to read more about it, here's the link: What Brexit Means
Enjoy watching. Wink

there are no problems with EU burocracy, the standards surve a purpose main problem is the leeching city of london that has to much power and influence over europe, its time it gets crushed and looks like a bunch of crappy icos.
legendary
Activity: 2814
Merit: 2472
https://JetCash.com
Here is one example of the power of the City of London - http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list

Most people haven't hear of the LBMA good delivery list, but it allows for the exchange of gold bars at the international level, and it is meant to avoid constant assaying. LIBOR is yet another way the City controls world finance. The LBMA good delivery list is current under appraisal, as the tungsten filled bars bought by China from Fort Knox was supposed to be guaranteed as pure. Some organisation has got at the bars and created gold plated tungsten bars to replace the pure ones. Some people estimate that as much as 40% of the bars used for international settlement could be forged. It is extremely difficult to find out any information, as the asset values involved are astronomical, and disclosure of irregularities could cause massive waves in the banking system.

I found an interview with Robin Tilbrook from 20th March. It's 18 minutes long, and it covers much of the legal background to the claim.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAMbqf-OrvE

legendary
Activity: 3430
Merit: 3080
Very few people seem to accept the fact that the EU is controlled by the City of London (in partnership with a few other dynasties), as is much of the Western world. Their employees and activists are in control of Parliament and the Civil Service. Parliament is located in the City of Westminster, and once you realise this, you can understand that the whole Brexit process was an orchestrated plan.

What most people consider to be London is in fact a county ( Greater London) with a Mayor, and the City of London is an independent state that has retained its separate identity since the time of William the Conqueror. It has it own Lord Mayor, police force and laws. It is ruled by Almoners and Livery Companies, and the Queen needs to be met at the gates and escorted by an Almoner if she wants to make an official visit. It has its own representative in Westminster, who is known as the Rememberancer, and he is not elected, but is appointed by the City of London. England has a very old and complex political structure, and most people are not aware of the powers that it has. For example the Queen is able to enact certain statutes in the US. She gained these rights as a result of defaults on debts owed by both aides in the Civil War.

Even though some of this is slightly true (i.e. City of London is somewhat politicially autonomus), it's not relelvant to your point.

British military, spying and corporate power has an undue influence on the world, but it has nothing to do with arcane legal powers which may or may not exist (and are difficult to research).


Y'know how British spys, military and corporations really exert control over people? Lies and bullying. The whole point is that they don't care about rules or morals, and so citing weird laws as the basis for hegemonic acts makes precisely zero sense

It's very simple, and not quite as weird and spooky as your explanation, which only makes you and people like you look like weirdos that can be safely ignored. If you really care about balance of power issues, try to sound a little less like David Icke
legendary
Activity: 2814
Merit: 2472
https://JetCash.com
Very few people seem to accept the fact that the EU is controlled by the City of London (in partnership with a few other dynasties), as is much of the Western world. Their employees and activists are in control of Parliament and the Civil Service. Parliament is located in the City of Westminster, and once you realise this, you can understand that the whole Brexit process was an orchestrated plan.

What most people consider to be London is in fact a county ( Greater London) with a Mayor, and the City of London is an independent state that has retained its separate identity since the time of William the Conqueror. It has it own Lord Mayor, police force and laws. It is ruled by Almoners and Livery Companies, and the Queen needs to be met at the gates and escorted by an Almoner if she wants to make an official visit. It has its own representative in Westminster, who is known as the Rememberancer, and he is not elected, but is appointed by the City of London. England has a very old and complex political structure, and most people are not aware of the powers that it has. For example the Queen is able to enact certain statutes in the US. She gained these rights as a result of defaults on debts owed by both aides in the Civil War.

It is Robin Tilbrook who is filing the action.
https://robintilbrook.blogspot.com/

legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1232
There were a lot of factors why the UK left the European Union but I have read an article before that the EU is now trying to initiate the globalization. BREXIT or British exit argued that by reclaiming sovereignty, the UK would be better able to manage their immigration, free itself enormous regulations and start more dynamic growth.

If you want to read more about it, here's the link: What Brexit Means
Enjoy watching. Wink
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325
With the UK parliament being unable to agree to terms of the UKs exit, I suspect the UK will eventually be kicked out by the EU by way of eventually not extending the deadline for the UK to agree to terms.  

absolutely correct, eu doesnt want the lose tooth "uk" in its union, a slicing appart similiar to jugoslawia is likely followed by an annexation of northern ireland scotish independence, etc.

the pieces of uk will be more EU loyal than the compound dominated by england
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
Regardless of any loopholes or legal technicalities in the law, the EU is almost certainly not going to enforce the UK being out of the EU until mid April, when they will need to either extend the deadline, or the UK and EU will have come to an agreement regarding the terms of its exit.

With the UK parliament being unable to agree to terms of the UKs exit, I suspect the UK will eventually be kicked out by the EU by way of eventually not extending the deadline for the UK to agree to terms. 
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325
Oh, come ony guys, it is something both sides want, no need to be mean to each other Smiley.

thats true EU is tired of the way these "islanders" talk about continental integration, they just threw it into a referendum, by a prime minister.

the way they acted and behavior now will be punished.

count the amount of statesmen and government resignation during this conflict

EU 0

UK 18 (including teresa may, tori ministers) just in one year

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/brexit-resignations-full-every-minister-13593984

when there will be an economic crisis in uk then not because eu caused it, but because the brexit put them finally into a position to actually earn the stuff they consume.
member
Activity: 845
Merit: 56
Oh, come ony guys, it is something both sides want, no need to be mean to each other Smiley.
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325
It doesn't seem to have hit the Internet yet, so you read it first here on Bitcoin Talk - the top forum for political news and discussion. Smiley

This is all I have been able to find so far - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QaUiHm7p9tQ&t=90s

It's a video by Jeff Taylor, who is an active member of UKIP, and a strong supporter of a true Brexit ( and English beer).
It will be great if we can get away from the lower food standards of the EU, and get back to the old British food quality. Maybe we can even get back to the use of healthy iodine in bread making instead of the unhealthy bromine that is used today. The abolition of fractional reserve banking would be good as well, but there is no chance of that, as the City of London rules the EU as well as the UK.

so much nonsense, you have no idea what you are talking about, islandish beggar!

these british "high" food standards where for the king and higher nobility only, rest of the population was just cattle remember the time where british children digged underground for coal, thats where you are heading

it was human cattle that was scammed by religion and the financial system that made your "high" food standards for the few.

legendary
Activity: 2814
Merit: 2472
https://JetCash.com
It doesn't seem to have hit the Internet yet, so you read it first here on Bitcoin Talk - the top forum for political news and discussion. Smiley

This is all I have been able to find so far - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QaUiHm7p9tQ&t=90s

It's a video by Jeff Taylor, who is an active member of UKIP, and a strong supporter of a true Brexit ( and English beer).
It will be great if we can get away from the lower food standards of the EU, and get back to the old British food quality. Maybe we can even get back to the use of healthy iodine in bread making instead of the unhealthy bromine that is used today. The abolition of fractional reserve banking would be good as well, but there is no chance of that, as the City of London rules the EU as well as the UK.
member
Activity: 845
Merit: 56
Well, I hope so, but could you let us know? We probably need your parliament to vote on that. Oh, wait...
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325
It would appear the the Soros funded action by Gina Miller which forced a ruling that the triggering of article 50 required Royal assent for a statute. This means that any revocation or variance would also require such a statute to be passed through parliament. This was not done, and it is obviously too late to start the process. Under international law and English law, it would appear that the UK is no longer a member of the EU. I understand a suitable High Court action has been started, and it will be interesting to see how that is fought, and the results.
#
oh you definately will see your island being sliced into pieces. like jugoslawia, and they then all will apply for eu membership individually again and they will be audited for that, the awareness to live on an island will be wipped off of the populations mind in the future, they wont think it matters.
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325
It would appear the the Soros funded action by Gina Miller which forced a ruling that the triggering of article 50 required Royal assent for a statute. This means that any revocation or variance would also require such a statute to be passed through parliament. This was not done, and it is obviously too late to start the process. Under international law and English law, it would appear that the UK is no longer a member of the EU. I understand a suitable High Court action has been started, and it will be interesting to see how that is fought, and the results.

As far as I know, UK is still member of EU, at least until April 12.
Until that day UK parliament should decide f they want to leave EU without agreement or ask for new delay but in that case they will have to particpate in the eU elections.
It seems there is no easy choices for UK now.

uk parliament are just a bunch of brainded zombies, they are using may as a negotiator that has all his arms and legs cut off, the moment uk leaving the EU will happen as soon as an inflation kicks and in mass shortages in all kinds of advanced goods occur, and also companies losing their ability to earn money from continental supply chains,

for example the mini car wont be produced in uk anymore and airbus will have to relocate his production back to the continent.

in europe brits will basically become what they had as the polish in uk

brits will become europes cheap labour source because the pound will become worthless.

at the same time there will be countless social clashes, because countless businesses wont be able to sell their stuff into the continent anymore and earn themselves an access to consumption capacities.

european manufacturers (airbus, bmw) did big mistakes when they invested into that idiotic islander population.
jr. member
Activity: 42
Merit: 3
Why soros hasn't been droned already, I have no idea.  His holdings broken up and dispersed to the poor.  
legendary
Activity: 2814
Merit: 2472
https://JetCash.com
That is based on an extension that didn't receive royal assent, and isn't a legal variation of the statute. Therefore it has no force, or so the legal argument goes. There will now be a load of useless arguing amongst the lawyers and politicians instead of getting on with rebuilding the UK economy after the predations of the Eton/Oxford elite's EU asset extractor.
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1824
It would appear the the Soros funded action by Gina Miller which forced a ruling that the triggering of article 50 required Royal assent for a statute. This means that any revocation or variance would also require such a statute to be passed through parliament. This was not done, and it is obviously too late to start the process. Under international law and English law, it would appear that the UK is no longer a member of the EU. I understand a suitable High Court action has been started, and it will be interesting to see how that is fought, and the results.

As far as I know, UK is still member of EU, at least until April 12.
Until that day UK parliament should decide f they want to leave EU without agreement or ask for new delay but in that case they will have to particpate in the eU elections.
It seems there is no easy choices for UK now.
legendary
Activity: 2814
Merit: 2472
https://JetCash.com
It would appear the the Soros funded action by Gina Miller which forced a ruling that the triggering of article 50 required Royal assent for a statute. This means that any revocation or variance would also require such a statute to be passed through parliament. This was not done, and it is obviously too late to start the process. Under international law and English law, it would appear that the UK is no longer a member of the EU. I understand a suitable High Court action has been started, and it will be interesting to see how that is fought, and the results.
Jump to: