Author

Topic: btcjam.com - problems (Read 884 times)

legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1029
September 13, 2013, 09:53:58 PM
#7
Working again now!
legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1029
September 13, 2013, 03:30:57 PM
#6

Seems like they had a problem, the site redirect to the blog with the message;

Amazon AWS shortage

Dear Users,

Due to an Amazon EC2/AWS shortage this morning we had to take the site offline. For security reasons we are now reindexing our wallet, it will take some time (approx. 2h).

We will keep you posted.




They better be back up without any problems, I had all my Bitcoins in there...

It would be embarrassing for everyone, everyone says "people on BTCjam will scam the shit out of you"  Be funny if BTCjam themselves scam x_x
full member
Activity: 241
Merit: 107
September 13, 2013, 02:15:30 PM
#5

Seems like they had a problem, the site redirect to the blog with the message;

Amazon AWS shortage

Dear Users,

Due to an Amazon EC2/AWS shortage this morning we had to take the site offline. For security reasons we are now reindexing our wallet, it will take some time (approx. 2h).

We will keep you posted.


member
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
Cookies!!! Gimme Cookies!!!
September 13, 2013, 12:46:23 PM
#4
Looks likes it's still down. Anyone have any updates?
legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
Crackpot Idealist
September 13, 2013, 10:38:53 AM
#3
I can get the site to load but its not showing a balance for my BTC.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
September 13, 2013, 10:38:07 AM
#2
I tried to load the website, and it did not work.
full member
Activity: 241
Merit: 107
September 13, 2013, 10:34:25 AM
#1
Hi,

Is there anyone that know what is happening at https://btcjam.com/, its been quite some time that I am unable to access the site.

Checked with;

 http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/btcjam.com

got

It's not just you! http://btcjam.com looks down from here.

Please let me know if you are able to access the site.

Thank you,

Hamburger

PS; Please do not respond if you do not have value to add to this question.
Jump to: