Topic: Buterin decepts with fallacy, Wright likely to be true Bitcoin Founder (Read 190 times)

screw it
heres proof that craig doesnt understand satoshis vision
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64E8FzUd0no
just watch the first 4 minutes
(P.S craig skpyed from his UK home because he cannot attend the sydney event in person out of fear of arrest)

just grabbing data from a third party and trusting it is not satoshis vision
satoshi's vision is decentralised and trustless..
craigs vision is oligarchy and trusted.

nodes have a function. its the whole point of decentralisation
imagine a pool made a block.. if nodes accept it. then they will reject the other pools competing block. if a node rejects the block then they accept the competitors block.

this is why pools have a 100 confirm maturity on their block rewards so that they can only spend funds when the network deems a block valid and then on a 100 block ahead of it length that there is little to no chance of it being bad.

merchants need a clear and checked blockchain that they have checked themselves and not just trusted that a pool has checked.
after all bitcoin is trustless.

if we followed craigs rationale that merchants and users should not run nodes and just trust what pools send out is valid.. we are no longer on satoshis vision, but (ELI-5:) simply accepting a bank statement that a bank sends us

gotta laugh at his mindset at the 4th minute.. "the vision of bitcoin is wrong.. it would be great if we had banks in countries running bitcoin"
lol that video alone and that quote alone really shows he has no idea about satoshi's vision nor the real point of bitcoin
did you even look at the message in the genesis block. satoshi hates banks and wants people to move funds without banks
craig wants the opposite

he is not a passive person. have you seen his youtube video's he is arogant and self centered

those that have worked with him have said his attitude stinks
those that have done business with him have seen him for what he truly is.

please do your research
P.S read the letter from dave to craig in the link i first posted to the other topic.. dave never gave craig a penny.. davs brothers case is empty of anything.. its all a ruse to bait media attention again and then when the case falls flat.. use the case fallin flat as empty proof..(like a double negative hoping its enough to make a positive)

and thats buterins point.. craig does all this deceptive crap to avoid just signing a message. craig even bribes people to write stories in media and getting people he knows to open a court case they both know wont go anywhere.. rather than do the simple task of signing a message or moving the funds.

the reasono craig is doing all this
1. he got caught red handed running a scam
2. he hows hundreds of millions to not only the australian governemtn but to many investment companies.
3. he has the australian government on his back
4. he has many corporations on his back

if he didnt owe multiple millions he would not bother with this. but because he cant really return to australia without seeing handcuffs and he cant clear his name any other way. all he can do is dig himself a deeper hole and hope people are dumb enough to believe him based on paid for media stories.. not proof

craig is not relying on providing proof.. but just using media to provide "reasonable doubt"

but since when are getting theologic more passive people like Wright themselves into such huge legal trouble on purpose? for greed of attention? thats not a usual human behavior pattern, espacially for this demographic.

for me he looks like someone that accidentally got himself into that trouble, wouldnt deny him bitcoin foundership though, i am waiting for a private social profile weather the theory of the asian and IT affine free time coder theologist can be ruled out.

but well fine i have other things to do, buterin nevertheless does crappy assumptions on very limited information, and stupid audiences fall for it. i was quite pissed of that so i wrote that Blog

dont do assumption on things you dont know because that can be quite a lot in this world that is quite complicated and big.

you can look like an idiot, for those that are more aware.

there is plenty of evidence
read the stuff from the australian tax authorities, read from the companies that got scammed from his tulip trust collateral

he is being chased left right and center by many people with court orders against him..

oh.. and funny part is this latest daves brothr sues craig..
that story is a double agent scam..

heres how it goes
person C wants to prove he is S.. so he writes a list of public information and gets D to witness it.

D's brother knows its all fake but C will pay D's brother if D's brother tried to sue C

the ruse is this.
show the list of public information that disproves D's brothers case.. (done purposefully between C and D's brother knowing thats whats gonna happen)

to then pretend the case itself is the proof that C must be S.

even though there is still no private key used to prove the funds are in C's control

craig wright is trying all these stupid ways to try getting the aussie government and a bunch of corps he scammed off his back. but he knows he cant actually prove he owns the coins with real proof. because he doesnt have the keys.

all he can do is use media and stories and now a fake lawsuit that is designed to fail, purely to make the failure look like the proof. without actually showing proof

still though, how often are people abitious when they are beeing denied opportunity,

you will have to research his character profile weather it matches, an ambitious free time coder is likely that developed passion for logic coding and math from his work about religious doctrines,

i keep my assumption even if you dont like them, because you cant disprove them, and he doenst look like someone that wants to scam as but more like someone that tries to take legit merit.

PS: there are no good and reliable sources in the internet, one should rely on typical millenia old human behavior patterns, and Wright showed them.

he excelled at something he loved in his spare time, but i am not going to fight this, creating assumptions on limited information is a quite usual misbehavior pattern here.

he is not a professor/lecturer!!!

he was a unpaid adjunct academic. not a paid adjunct lecturer
the difference is simple

he was a student that got free scholarship by being a shadow(teachers assistant).

please please please do your research.
also you keep obsessing over the asian influence.. sorry but you need to do alot more research..

P.S reddit and linkedin are not good sources. look deeper

So what? bitcoin creator is wright or any person, it really does not matter. If he has no coin or not as much coin that he can affect the market, that totally is not important for me.

i am working on it,

still though the theory is interesting,

1. a theologist with a passion for math IT and Coding in his free time, as a relive from accepting religious doctrines

2. as an australian professor under strong asian cultural influnece,

3. insecure about claims and discrete

to be the now true and despised bitcoin founder,

if you rather believe in buterin and his  assumption based on 0.001% of total information than go,

since when are theologists in the west known for their greed for unearned public attention?

Our friend Craig could put a significant amount of doubt to rest with a couple of clicks. That he has not tells me he is a gnarled, infected penis with millipedes crawling out of the urethra.

You need to do more constructive things with your time.

no i dont, i deliver you a logical explanation,

what does a programmer do in his spare time? same stuff he does at work? unlikely he tries to relax from coding at work

what does a theologist in his private time do that has developed a private hobby style passion for math and coding?  religious propaganda? no he coded,

coding, math and encription for wright is like leisure for others, typical IT coders dont do IT and math extra out of work, wright was able to excel because he truly was able to enjoy coding in his free time.

lol all im reading is your belief and faith like he is your god..
your sounding like a religious believer in him more so than a fact finder.

next time use knowledge and facts, not emotions and beliefs.
sorry but real world evidence supersedes your beliefs

but have a nice day

doesnt disprove anything, actually a theologist with a huge private passion for mathematical codes and Programming in his spare time,

many theologists nowadays seek gods means in math and formulas, just tread him just once as the despised bitcoin founder a westerner that got under asianised cultural influence and u will see.

why should a theologist greave for public attention to scam the masses, like some sort of addict? thats not logical, theologists are quite honest people.

just check his tweets he is privatly obsessed with math and logic not with god allah etc. how many people flee their private boring job live for things the others have?

a lot a lot and often those that chose their new passion secrelty completely somwhere else excelled in it, because wright considers math and coding as freedom and passion, not religion which is work for him

no wonder he excelled there.

charles sturt denied giving him a PHD
craig wright said his PHD was in theology... not computer science.

plus he is not a professor in australia.. he is hiding out in the UK and cant return to australia out of fear of arrest

please research harder.

jes i rather think satoshi was just a discrete insecure professor in australia that simply doesnt has the habit of going public with a huge bell,

you think of satoshi like batman, or superman, but the reality isnt that crazy the easy answer is right in front of you,

and thats just an asianised australian professor that worked his project discrete.


Additionally HE IS a proffessor HE is a Doctor he indeed has the specialised profession to have been capable to code bitcoin,

professionals from universities dont have the habit to go public when they arent 100% sure of truth and public reaction,

your assumption satoshi was some kind of ninja batman looks absurd in comparision, why are you ignoring the bitcoin founder?

I completely agree with you, real satoshi will never appear again, not only now, during the early stages of bitcoin, he always kept his identity private and some say he will reveal his identity NOW lol!

you cant use writing style of articles to assume a persons profile because this guy goes publicly through a lot,

the asianised westerner/australian theory puts wright indeed into likelyness of bitcoins foundership

additionally he has a lot of Coding Knowledge of Bitcoin, which doesnt come out of nothing, buterins assumption are amateurish.

wright as IT professor and asianised westerner/australian could indeed be the despised Bitcoin founder, that the world for stupid reasons still Ignores.

Check his private affiliation with east asian Culture, and you will find the truth. he is a proffessor in a university in australia shouldnt be hard to find out.  

neither buterin, craig or dave are satoshi..

here i made a short version of why dave and wright are not satoshi
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.31194506

.. might help you research better

I quickly wrote that Article on my Blog shortly after i researched some Stuff on Youtube,

I thought beforehand that wright isnt the Bitcoin Frounder, just some sort of Scammer,

but After Buterins logical fallacy, i reconsidered Wrights role and Character,

Wright is likely a culturally asianised Westerner that out of profession has the habit to behave systematically discrete. he is indeed likely that he used satoshi nakamoto as a pseudonym due to strong influence from east asia he lives under as an IT professor in Australia.

21 year Buterin doesnt think that far. and spreads logical fallacies huge part of the Audience take for Granted.

https://www.cryptoproductivity.com/single-post/2018/02/27/Buterin-decepts-Audience-with-logical-fallacy-about-Wrights-role-in-Bitcoins-Creation

Honor the Bitcoin Founder, now we know for Sure,

the Question is weather Wright will want to hold that Title in a World in which he is Sued for multiple Billions


The Article in Short:

In a youtube Video Vitalik Buterin publicly spreads an assumption denying Craig Wright's role in Bitcoin's Creation, using an argument out of the signaling Theory that Wright, would have moved publicly instead to single persons, Buterin however successfully decepted the Audience here with a logical fallacy because he created and propagated his personal assumptions on his naturally limited information about Wright, neither does Buterin has any idea about Wright's personal emotional comfort with how to approach and do public Communication, or how Wright should assume how public Communication should be done. Even if Buterin would have a detailed Consideration of Wrights Complicated, and likely as for all other human beeing volatile and impulsive social behavior pattern, which Buterin obviously never had, Buterin still wouldnt be able to know Wrights personal thoughts and motives, and style at the moment when he decided to publicy communicate his role in Bitcoin's Creation.

Fazit: Maybe Wright is simply not emotionally Comfortable with Buterins suggested patterns of public Communication and for emotional feelings just chose an approach not beeing considered the "right" by Buterin.

Still a Huge Audience in Youtube, admired Buterin for his quite Bad assumption.
followed and approved of it. Maybe not to Wrights Disadvantage which has with his Outcome put himself into legal Battles about possible Theft of 5 Billion USD worth in Bitcoin.

Wirights legal Issues:
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/27/bitcoin-creator-craig-wright-accused-of-stealing-cryptocurrency-from-colleague.html


 Buterin's Public Fallacy:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qLI3VIHuKU

C-PRO Opinion:
We close this Article with our Opinion about Wright, from our limited Information we consider now the following assumption, Dr. Wright as an Australian Citizen and IT. Professor developed over the past decades due to immigration from eastasia to australia a taste for east asian culture, many of his students assistants, collegues were likely asians or immigrants from eastasia, due to those countries high population density there is some sort natural magnet that austrialia poses for urban asians. [u]Wright is likely an asianised Westerner (or better Australian) that might indeed used the Pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto[/u] out of personal reasons with his individual Background, and Taste. As a man of Science especially IT, he has a nature of constantly questioning his private assumptions a lot, therefore doesnt consider it right of going public like the 21 year old Buterin considers normal.

Leaving us with a strong Argument that Wright is a Culturally asianised Westerner that Actually Coded Bitcoin.