Topic: California Passes First-Ever Bill to Define Sexual Consent on College Campuses (Read 956 times)
September 01, 2014, 01:49:34 PM
What about those who get raped while in state custody?
September 01, 2014, 01:43:50 PM
You guys seriously need to stop posting stuff that makes me go "What?" out loud.
September 01, 2014, 01:35:26 PM
The best way to not become victim of false allegation is not to flirt on campus.
Just hold the joystick tight while on campus and use it elsewhere.
Just hold the joystick tight while on campus and use it elsewhere.
August 31, 2014, 06:33:34 PM
This will all be hearsay. How will schools know if she said yes or no? Will they take her word for it? What if the accused claims she said yes, but she denies saying yes? Who do you believe? How will they justify whom to believe?
I wouldn't be surprised if they found the accused to be guilty. This is one way California is making it so that college campuses don't have any false-rape allegations. They will only get rape cases.
Right. It creates a judicial system outside of the judicial system. Of course now we have a civilian police force - the TSA - outside of the normal police and military. And we've got a do-anything-we-want judiciary - ran by Eric Holder - that operates outside the normal law.I wouldn't be surprised if they found the accused to be guilty. This is one way California is making it so that college campuses don't have any false-rape allegations. They will only get rape cases.
Got a feeling this isn't going to end well.
legendary
Activity: 2884
Merit: 1115
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
August 31, 2014, 05:44:45 AM
Politics and Society never ceases to surprise and amaze me at times
Those who oppose the bill are concerned that such a policy, combined with unavoidably murky sexual encounters, will deny college men due process and unfairly categorize them as rapists, causing potentially unfair suspensions and expulsions or reputational damage.
There is already a double standard between men and women this just adds some more fuel to the fire.
Those who oppose the bill are concerned that such a policy, combined with unavoidably murky sexual encounters, will deny college men due process and unfairly categorize them as rapists, causing potentially unfair suspensions and expulsions or reputational damage.
There is already a double standard between men and women this just adds some more fuel to the fire.
August 31, 2014, 03:14:44 AM
No more genitalia means NO.
August 31, 2014, 12:14:40 AM
Fuck California, and fuck New York while we're at it; may as well cut the shit and go full-on dictatorship.
August 31, 2014, 12:00:26 AM
So much for "government doesn't have a place in our bedrooms"...
August 30, 2014, 11:04:58 PM
This will all be hearsay. How will schools know if she said yes or no? Will they take her word for it? What if the accused claims she said yes, but she denies saying yes? Who do you believe? How will they justify whom to believe?
I wouldn't be surprised if they found the accused to be guilty. This is one way California is making it so that college campuses don't have any false-rape allegations. They will only get rape cases.
In theory it would prevent many clear instances of rape from happening, however it will likely lead to a lot of false accusations. I wouldn't be surprised if they found the accused to be guilty. This is one way California is making it so that college campuses don't have any false-rape allegations. They will only get rape cases.
I think the best solution would be to educate girls how to better protect themselves from sexual assault and to better educate men as to why rape is wrong and the moral consequences.
August 30, 2014, 08:47:58 PM
This will all be hearsay. How will schools know if she said yes or no? Will they take her word for it? What if the accused claims she said yes, but she denies saying yes? Who do you believe? How will they justify whom to believe?
I wouldn't be surprised if they found the accused to be guilty. This is one way California is making it so that college campuses don't have any false-rape allegations. They will only get rape cases.
I wouldn't be surprised if they found the accused to be guilty. This is one way California is making it so that college campuses don't have any false-rape allegations. They will only get rape cases.
August 30, 2014, 08:30:25 PM
California Passes First-Ever Bill to Define Sexual Consent on College Campuses
http://time.com/3211938/campus-sexual-assault-consent-california/
<< The California Senate passed a first-in-the-nation bill Thursday to define what amounts to consensual sexual activity in colleges in the state, a milestone at a time when colleges across the country are under close scrutiny for how they handle campus sexual assault. (...) Those who oppose the bill are concerned that such a policy, combined with unavoidably murky sexual encounters, will deny college men due process and unfairly categorize them as rapists, causing potentially unfair suspensions and expulsions or reputational damage. >>
http://time.com/3211938/campus-sexual-assault-consent-california/
<< The California Senate passed a first-in-the-nation bill Thursday to define what amounts to consensual sexual activity in colleges in the state, a milestone at a time when colleges across the country are under close scrutiny for how they handle campus sexual assault. (...) Those who oppose the bill are concerned that such a policy, combined with unavoidably murky sexual encounters, will deny college men due process and unfairly categorize them as rapists, causing potentially unfair suspensions and expulsions or reputational damage. >>
Jump to: