Call non-pool miners 'block submitters' instead of 'miners'

dscotese

sr. member

Activity: 444

Merit: 250

I prefer evolution to revolution.

Quote from: markm on March 15, 2013, 09:55:26 PM

Is a solo miner pretty much just a pool operator who has no users (other than himself / his botnet / his corporation / his CPU / his GPU / etc), or is there some further distinction between them that impacts such things as which version they "should" upgrade or downgrade to, or "would" tend to favour or risk favouring in the event of a fork?

(A pool operator might have more vested interest in not rocking some boat or other, maybe?)

-MarkM-

The way people are using "pool operator", I think so.

I like Hashers and Blockers. "Miners" refers to both already, but a Hasher never assembles a block, and a Blocker rarely finds the solution, except in the case of solo miners, which have to be both.

os2sam

legendary

Activity: 3583

Merit: 1094

Think for yourself

How about Fred for short.

markm

legendary

Activity: 2940

Merit: 1090

Is a solo miner pretty much just a pool operator who has no users (other than himself / his botnet / his corporation / his CPU / his GPU / etc), or is there some further distinction between them that impacts such things as which version they "should" upgrade or downgrade to, or "would" tend to favour or risk favouring in the event of a fork?

(A pool operator might have more vested interest in not rocking some boat or other, maybe?)

-MarkM-

jgarzik

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1100

Transaction validators.

John Tobey

hero member

Activity: 481

Merit: 529

A half hour spent clarifying the distinction on the Wiki might go a long way.

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Miner

MysteryMiner

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1049

Death to enemies!

And call spoon eating shovel Cheesy

Solo miners and polled miners are called so from beginning of mining. The change is unnecessary and will not stick.

crazyates

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1000

Quote from: crazyates on March 15, 2013, 04:10:13 PM

Sooo... it's basically a pool operator, and a miner connected to that pool?

Better question: Why do we need a distinction? Pooled mining has been around for years, and it's never really been an issue.

crazyates

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1000

Quote from: justusranvier on March 15, 2013, 03:57:40 PM

I think the distinction is between people who assemble new blocks from transactions vs people who only calculate hashes for blocks that someone else gives them.

Sooo... it's basically a pool operator, and a miner connected to that pool?

justusranvier

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1013

Quote from: crazyates on March 15, 2013, 03:55:49 PM

I'm confused. I've been involved in Bitcoin for about a year and a half. Over that time, I've found 5 blocks (I think) through 2 different pools. Would I be a "miner" or a "hasher" or a "block submitter" ?

I think the distinction is between people who assemble new blocks from transactions vs people who only calculate hashes for blocks that someone else gives them.

"Miner" is a good term for the former, and "hasher" is a good term for the latter.

crazyates

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1000

I'm confused. I've been involved in Bitcoin for about a year and a half. Over that time, I've found 5 blocks (I think) through 2 different pools. Would I be a "miner" or a "hasher" or a "block submitter" ?

Would that change if I:

A) Had been mining for that year and a half but never found a block?
B) Solo mined those 5 blocks?
C) Solo mined for 1.5 years, and never found a block?

Peter Todd

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1160

I like the term "hashers" myself, short and simple.

Rarrikins

newbie

Activity: 23

Merit: 0

I'd like to propose saying 'block submitter' to refer specifically to a miner that actually submits new blocks. This is better than 'miner', since that also alludes to people who mine through pools and don't submit any blocks themselves.

This would avoid some of the potential confusion I noticed in a message about the recent unanticipated hardfork:

Quote from: Rarrikins on March 15, 2013, 12:52:22 PM

Quote from: etotheipi on March 11, 2013, 09:40:59 PM

The original post lacked info for "regular users". Here it is:
...
Only miners have an incentive to do anything.

If you're talking to regular users, it doesn't make sense to talk about 'miners' in a way that implicitly doesn't include people who mine through pools, who obviously don't need to do anything since the pool operator will handle that.

Quote from: markm on March 15, 2013, 12:55:54 PM

The use of the same term for hashers and people who actually validate and prepare blocks for hashing has been causing confusion all over the place for a while now.

Maybe clearer terminology is called for?

-MarkM-

Topic: Call non-pool miners 'block submitters' instead of 'miners' (Read 1470 times)