In the thread itself? Yes, it's full of shit accounts.
From users joining to make 2-3 posts in the thread only, to users coming back after ~10 months to make 26 posts in the same thread. Or the one coming back from 2018, just for Zorro coin (the name is funny btw, I even started to sing the song).
There are 5-6 accounts feeling the topic with a lot of shits. It looks like several posts have deleted before but they seem to continue their trash. I don't even need to visit the website, it must be the same quality as their ANN thread
Edit:OK, I couldn't resist visiting the website and started to read the WP, saying to myself "hummm.. very similar"
https://www.zorrochain.com/ZorroWhitepaper.pdfInspired by the Blockchain architecture and the existing Merkle tree-based signature scheme, we
have proposed BPQS, a scalable post-quantum (PQ) resistance digital signature scheme, which is
most suitable for Blockchain and Distributed ledger technology (DLT). A unique feature of this
protocol is that it can use a dedicated chain or image structure to reduce the cost of key generation,
signing, verification, and the size of the signature. Compared with other recent improvements, when
a key is used for a reasonable number of signatures, BPQS is better than existing hash algorithms.
If necessary, it also supports a rollback mechanism that allows unlimited number of signatures. We
provide a specific open source implementation of the protocol, and benchmark it.
The latest developments in the field of quantum computing and its threat to classical cryptography
have stimulated more interest in post-quantum research
Taken and rephrased from
Inspired by the blockchain architecture and existing Merkle tree based signature schemes, we propose BPQS, an extensible post-quantum (PQ) resistant digital signature scheme best suited to blockchain and distributed ledger technologies (DLTs). One of the unique characteristics of the protocol is that it can take advantage of application-specific chain/graph structures in order to decrease key generation, signing and verification costs as well as signature size. Compared to recent improvements in the field, BPQS outperforms existing hash-based algorithms when a key is reused for reasonable numbers of signatures, while it supports a fallback mechanism to allow for a practically unlimited number of signatures if required. We provide an open source implementation of the scheme and benchmark it.
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8726842 
