Author

Topic: Can bitcoin allow people to choose a PoS hard fork? (Read 825 times)

donator
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
PoS will never go anywhere. It's a dead discussion.
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1054
CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io
The beauty of open source is that nobody has to allow you do to anything, you can just do it
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
This would be super cool to give people a choice. Then they could save the babies, puppies, and rainbows!

It's already allowed. It's called PPC Smiley.
sed
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
what sense would that make?
do you really think someone would support the fork?

Nope, I'm just asking a theoretical question for knowledge sake.  Not trying to suggest that  the experiment would be a good idea.
full member
Activity: 189
Merit: 100
POS bitcoin is called BitBTC. The market peg allows you to always exchange them for close to 1:1. POS doesn't replace POW, it complements it. A POS network like bitshares can do all the fancy things that bitcoin can't, like smart contracts, fast block times and decentralized exchange. Bitcoin can focus on being a currency.
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
what sense would that make?
do you really think someone would support the fork?
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1004
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
 I wonder which parts of the protocol for consensus are validated and which parts arent.  Does this question make sense?

Not really...how can you have a part of the consensus mechanism that doesn't validate?

Consensus means everyone has to follow the same rules, otherwise, how can we get the same outcome?
sed
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
I see, perhaps my question wasn't well thought out since I don't know a lot about the details of the protocol.   However, I could imagine someone making a bitcoin client that listens in on the network and tries to participate but implements changes in various aspects.  I wonder which parts of the protocol for consensus are validated and which parts arent.  Does this question make sense?
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1004
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
Perhaps a more technical version of this question is about what happens if i'm trying to run a modded version of the bitcoin protocol on the bitcoin network?  

Since PoS and PoW are two completely different security models, there wouldn't be consensus between them.  The blockchain would also fork.
sed
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
Perhaps a more technical version of this question is about what happens if i'm trying to run a modded version of the bitcoin protocol on the bitcoin network?   Will my node get ignored?  What validation is there in the network?  What parts of the protocol are validated by hard checking and what parts are mere convention?
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
This would be super cool to give people a choice. Then they could save the babies, puppies, and rainbows!

It is allowed. People can fork Bitcoin any time and create another alt. Without users supporting the fork, it will always remain as an alt.
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1004
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
What, 18 pages about PoS in the other thread wasn't enough?

"Coins" (like Bitcoin) are open source code repositories
and as such do not give permission to "allow people to choose hard forks".

Individuals can choose to fork any code repository
they have access to, at any time, for any reason.
donator
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
This would be super cool to give people a choice. Then they could save the babies, puppies, and rainbows!
Jump to: