Topic: Can dokctors and hospital and medical service be full ai (Read 152 times)

Man barely has any intelligence at all. If AI takes over humanity, then that is a good thing because humans are fucked up pieces of shit.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

No, because AI was programmed by man, and man did not program 100% of their intelligence into AI. This means AI has shortcomings; it could shut down or malfunction during an operation, potentially harming the patient.

AI was programmed with specific information on what to operate on and how to operate. If something extraordinary happens during an operation, AI will be confused. AI is not as intelligent as man in spontaneous or unpredictable situations.

Furthermore, AI's capabilities pale in comparison to God's gifts to humanity. We cannot create a device that surpasses or equals the abilities God has instilled in humans.

Let's stick to using AI as an assistant in specific areas, such as:

1. Helping diagnose illnesses
2. Aiding research
3. Increasing work efficiency and speed

AI cannot operate fully without human oversight. Absolutely not.

This can't be possible, no matter how efficient AI can be.  We can't risk and lay down our lives under the care of a robot. We humans, at times, need compassionate care whenever when we are down with illness. AI can't offer such "compassionate care'' to humans. On that note, we humans will be the ones to oversee and make complex medical decisions that require human expertise to ensure accurate results and directions. However, AI still falls under the control and monitoring of it by humans. AI can't fully take over hospital, company, or factory works

You cannot trust 100% anything other than rain, taxes and death - and even some people living in the Sahara may argue about rain.

Having said that, the perfect model should be mixed. AI is not that advanced. There is a lot of new stuff going on and I am sure there will be many applications working with health, etc... eg. image analysis is already a classic and comps do a great job.

However, diagnosing is also about talking and observing a patient, which is something humans do particularly well because they have evolved for millions of years to excel at that task.

In as much as the world is improving in technology and AI, I don’t find it interesting trying to replace humans with AI in the medical field. AI can be introduce to work alongside humans in the medical fields whereby they can carry out some minor tasks and not being involved when it comes to operating the human body. These are machines for crying out loud. And human life is involved. No matter how accurate we can thought AI has become, such risk shouldn’t be taken at all.

As you said, the W.H.O. will replace it.     

No, a person can never be replaced. No, a person can never be replaced. And if the robot crashes and breaks down at a crucial moment, who will replace it?

systems don't operate 💯 AI based accross different niches where AI is in massive use and thinking of such possibility in the medical field that involves human life makes it a no no on this subject matter. No matter how sophisticated and advanced the robot might be, without human assistance, I wouldn't trust the surgical process. Let machine do the part they can do and allow humans take care of what should be taken care of. One shouldn't be a replacement for the other and the trust we have on the robot we've built should never be a reason to trust them above our human instincts. In terms of precision and carrying out certain medical procedures without allowing emotions set in, Robots are good for those kinds of jobs but even at that, some expert still needs to be on ground to monitor a possible glitch that might occur.

Some medical cases require not just straight forward treatment but procedures that require certain kind of care and attention to the patient, those can't come from robot since they aren't emotional being. Even the regular chatGPT can't give a more reasonable opinion that myself to assume that I can totally depend on it for simple problems. After getting a response from it, I will have to break it down to what's really the case with the normal human world and that's the basic limitations of most robots and A.I. they are good in Thier way but can never be a replacement for humans not in any other field let alone the Almighty medical field.

I agree that doctors and surgeons need to use their instincts and careful thinking to make life saving decisions and especially in emergency situations. While AI is great at organizing data and keeping records and it can not make same complex decisions that healthcare professionals make. AI struggles with thinking deeply and adapting to new situations making it unsuitable for critical decisions that affect patient health. AI should help and not replace human decision making in healthcare.

Immediate no. Anyone who says yes do not understand the extent of work of medical staff.

Their work goes beyond stitching and repairing you or giving you medicine. It is beyond making assumptions based on your symptoms and lifestyle. It is not just monitoring your vital signs and taking some injection to put some medicine on you to keep you away from flatlining. Medical staff needs to be alert, welcoming, empathetic and sensitive. Characteristics that no AI will be able to possess.

Imagine having to console a family member after a bad news or trying to comfort a patient that is scared to go through an operation. or making some kind of sacrifices or adjustments to make sure the treatment is aligned with the patient's wants and needs. AI can't do all of these or at least not yet right now so no I will not trust a medical institution with nothing but robots working for them.

Back in the late 1970's, when the doctors in Orange County, CA, went on strike for better pay, there were 50% fewer deaths in Orange County. AI can't do any worse.

No because doctors & surgeons can sometimes need to make instant decisions that can save lives. Critical thinking & out of the box thinking, last minute decisions can not be done with AI. Certain things can probably be done with AI like data storing, medical records etc but no I don’t think ‘in the field’ , important decisions that affect patients health can be done with AI.

If doctors were not so highly restrained against quality medicine by corrupt governments, it would be harder for AI to compete with doctors. As the industry exists today doctoring is basically an academics exercise, which is something AI is good at.

AI is only competitive with doctors at the moment because the licensing requirement for doctors is fundamentally fascist as governments place controls over labor the supply of labor to a private industry. A free country should expect patients to regulate the medical industry by deciding which hospitals and doctors receive their business. The doctors and hospitals that don't receive enough business because they are poor quality can then go out of business, while the good ones stay in business.

So yes AI can replace most of the current prescription system because the prescription system is an excercize in government academia. The prescription system has become the focus of modern health care. AI cannot do blood testing though, so that requires a lab visit where a human draws your blood until robots can figure out how to do that.

Please shut the fuck up about AI shit. You are a piece of shit.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

It can't be 100% automated these days (or in the immediate future), but some tasks can definitely use AI (big data + analysis). No robot can perform surgery, IV injections, etc., as it's just too risky and I wouldn't trust a robot to do that. However, diagnosing patients, analyzing blood samples, and even prescribing medication can be done by AI. Even now you can consult with a doctor online, and you wouldn't notice if it was actually an advanced chatgpt bot lol, who knows?

Can medical and doctros and system be fully ai robots?
Will you trust them 100% ?If no any humans involved