Topic: Can the crypto world interact with the real world in production activities? (Read 3 times)

Last month, I led a team to visit an organic fertilizer manufacturer in Laos. Organic fertilizer is a very environmentally friendly product, which is made by fermenting livestock manure and straw. Although my boss gave up the investment plan due to its small scale, I still think it is a business worth considering.
Then I looked for investment everywhere, and many people were interested, but because Laos is very poor, investors think the market is too small and not worth entering - if it is in Thailand or Vietnam, they are very happy.
This caused me to think: the factors of production come from investment, and can investment come from the crypto world?
In other words: Can the funds in the crypto world directly invest in industry, agriculture, and services?
This is an interesting topic. The crypto world has always existed in the virtual world as a "escape from the government, escape from regulation, and escape from the world". However, the interaction between cryptocurrencies and traditional currencies has forced many crypto projects to be forced into limited government supervision. Despite this, the crypto world is still happy to build its own "virtual world" and wander in the cracks of the world with a gray image.
However, stripping away the appearance, the inner part of the crypto world is still the flow of capital - how similar is this to traditional finance. Since capital is flowing, why can't it be invested in any field that can make it profitable? Why must it be limited to POS, pledge, and DEFI? Why can't it be invested in production, planting, breeding, and smelting?
Therefore, I envisioned a model:
A. Set up a DAO organization on the chain. The authority of the DAO organization is to: build a fund pool; vote for the fund pool manager to establish a decision-making committee; decide the investment direction and location; review and decide the financial plan of the decision-making committee; remove the decision-making committee.
B. The authority of the decision-making committee is limited to: fund pool fundraising; formulate investment plans and propose to the DAO organization; formulate financial plans; hire and supervise the management team of the investment industry; be responsible for the management of funds according to the decision-making intention of the DAO organization.
C. The management team of the investment industry has the authority to: formulate the development plan of the industry; be responsible for the daily operation of the industry; hire staff; and implement the fund plan.
In this model, the DAO organization has the highest authority. It has decision-making power over the entire fund pool. The decision-making committee works under the leadership of the DAO organization and implements the actual financial plan. The management team of the investment industry works under the leadership of the decision-making committee and implements the actual production plan.
At the same time, because the decision-making committee is specific to individual entities, it can establish an entity with legal status in reality, which forms an interaction between the real world and the crypto world. Similarly, because the decision-making committee is an entity with legal status, it can refer to the laws of the real world to conduct de facto supervision and control over the management team of the investment industry.
The fund pool is deposited in the crypto world with cryptocurrency on a daily basis and operates through a robust value-added plan. Only when the decision-making committee proposes a financial plan and is approved by the DAO organization can the funds be converted into real currency according to the needs of the financial plan and flow to specific industries through the legal entity of the decision-making committee.
Similarly, the profit income of the industry will also return to the fund pool through this channel.
You can give more suggestions for discussion.