After asking whether we can still pursue careers in industries impacted by AI, another question arises: Which industries have been destroyed by AI? I firmly believe that AI can never replace the most creative and top-tier talents. What it truly undermines are those who fail to adapt, becoming overly reliant on AI for work and losing their edge. What bothers me the most is the dependency syndrome AI can create. People—myself included—sometimes feel guilty for using tools like ChatGPT to do the thinking or writing for us. It's a kind of laziness. Does anyone else feel the same way?
Your thoughts resonate deeply, and they highlight some of the most pressing questions about AI's role in shaping the future of work and creativity. The complexities of its impact are undeniable—while AI has streamlined tasks and transformed industries, it has also raised concerns about job displacement and the erosion of uniquely human skills. However, I believe this transformation isn't a destruction of industries but rather a redirection, urging us to rethink how we add value in a rapidly changing world.
Adaptability is key. History shows us that every technological leap has displaced some roles while creating new opportunities. The printing press once threatened scribes, yet it led to an explosion of literature and learning. AI is no different—it’s a tool, and how we wield it determines its impact. The challenge is to stay curious, continuously learn, and harness these tools to augment our strengths rather than replace them.
Your candid reflection on the emotional aspect of AI dependency is especially poignant. That pang of guilt when using tools like ChatGPT for tasks we traditionally associate with deep thinking or creativity is a shared experience for many. It’s a reminder of our inherent desire to feel authentic and engaged in our work. But perhaps we can reframe this: AI is not here to think for us but to think with us. It can handle the mundane and repetitive, freeing us to focus on higher-level creativity and problem-solving.
The fear of "laziness" is valid, but I see it as a call for balance. Just as calculators didn’t eliminate the need to understand math, AI doesn’t remove the need for critical thought—it only shifts where we apply it. The beauty of human creativity lies not just in the end product but in the process—the brainstorming, experimenting, and refining. AI can be a collaborator in that journey, offering new perspectives and possibilities we might not have considered alone.
I find hope in the idea that AI doesn’t diminish us—it expands what we can achieve. It’s an opportunity to forge new paths in industries we hadn’t imagined, to push the boundaries of creativity, and to connect more deeply with what makes us uniquely human.
I’d love to hear how others navigate this space. Do you see AI as a partner or a competitor in your work? How do you balance its use while maintaining a sense of personal authenticity and fulfillment? Let’s learn from each other’s experiences, so we can adapt and thrive together.