If you are a gambler and know the famous casinos all over the world, I am sure you know Casino de Monte Carlo. This casino located at the principality of Monaco is known for its opulent and lavish design. We know that Monaco is basically the land of the wealthiest and the casino proves it to be true. If you don’t know this casino, you may recognize it from a couple of James Bond movies and even the first novel was said to be inspired from the casino itself.
Ironically, citizens of Monaco are actually not allowed to gamble and even visit Casino de Monte Carlo. They are prohibited because the Princely family did not want their citizens to gamble away their money. Sounds pretty reasonable if you ask me. Monaco is known to be strict with maintaining their status quo. To live in Monaco, there is a minimum requirement of money in your bank account. So to say that they really do care about their citizens’ financial wellbeing. Whether out of genuine concern or just trying to maintain their image of wealth, I don’t know.
Anyway, if you were to be given a choice. Would you rather live in one of the wealthiest cities but not be able to gamble in the famous Casino? Or would you pass on the opportunity to live in Monaco and just visit the casino occasionally?
What is a casino? Or better still, assuming you are a rekted gambler, how do you define a casino?
For me, assuming I am a rekted gambler, I would simply define a casino as a place to loose money, not forced but willingly.
So, if the above be the definition of a casino for me, it makes me understand that seeing or even entering into one of the most richest and most beautiful casinos in the entire world won't put a penny in my pocket, but rather, it will take the little I have out of my pocket..
Man, I would rather choose to live a life of financial abundance and luxury in the most expensive part of Monaco and never have to gamble, than live outside wealth and spend my little money on one of the world's most prestigious casinos, what does that benefit me?