There are sites that try to review and rate casinos, but these are often paid to be biased and we are too, even f not in a direct way.
If you win a lot in a certain casino you'll tend to rate it better than others, even though the other ones offer top-notch service, good support, cheap and instant withdrawals, you'll pick the one where you happened to win the most (unless that one gives you trouble somehow).
Due to this, I wouldn't trust forum reviews too much, especially if they are simple, like rate a casino on a scale from 1-10, that's just too simple. Either read a review, or try to play there yourself and get a honest (at least towards yourself) opinion this way.
Topic: casino rating (Read 496 times)
Hi
Lets rate btc casinos)
Please write about your exp. and rate it (1-10)
For casino important: safety, good and easy interface and a lot of games)
I play on BitCasino.io
What is your opinion?
When it comes to rating or whatsoever correlation with this then it wont really be something that precise because it would always falls down on someones preference and numbers would really be different.Lets rate btc casinos)
Please write about your exp. and rate it (1-10)
For casino important: safety, good and easy interface and a lot of games)
I play on BitCasino.io
What is your opinion?
Of course they would really be introducing or would really be that bias with those reviews and ratings which on the place or platform on where they are staying and we know that experiences would vary or differ
on each other since not all would be sharing up with the same sentiment which it might really be a good place for you but not for others and this is something those one of the points which
could possibly be that different.
For the sake of answering this topic then i do rate on where i do play mostly.
Fortunejack.com
9/10
I just love their UI
I just love their games offered
I just love on how swift their support is
I just love those animations'
etcc.....
I think the ratings of each casino you can find in their ANN page although this can be a good addition to that.I also play only at Stake and another casino but I see no difficulties at all checking the email once a day during the 13th to 22th of the month,days in which the monthly is.
I also don't think the menu is difficult to understand,they tell you just click the blue button and claim,of course it is better to be in a desktop where you are already logged in into Stake so you can claim right away.
I also don't think the menu is difficult to understand,they tell you just click the blue button and claim,of course it is better to be in a desktop where you are already logged in into Stake so you can claim right away.
I think the interface is quite easy but not really standard, it would be advisable to get a better grasp of how the general market is moving in terms of usability and apply this to the site. Betcoin.at is quite good in interface and "playability" and this creates a good engagement to the players. It is common sense to check and try to improve it.
Hi
Lets rate btc casinos)
Please write about your exp. and rate it (1-10)
For casino important: safety, good and easy interface and a lot of games)
I play on BitCasino.io
What is your opinion?
I am currently playing in Stake and shuffle. Stake i trust over every casino out there and i see possible potential in shuffles airdrop, so i am in. Lets rate btc casinos)
Please write about your exp. and rate it (1-10)
For casino important: safety, good and easy interface and a lot of games)
I play on BitCasino.io
What is your opinion?
But i think that everyone in here would just rate their favorite casinos high even if they haven't compare it to others to have enough data to compare ratings, so the amount of stars of that one favorite casino would be disproportionate without comparing data.
In theory i like the idea that people rate, or unbiased professionals would rate sites, so it would be easy to choose what to use. But even if those would create traction, some casinos would eventually pay for higher ratings. Or offer free spins or something like that.
I think this is going to be a biase review because there is no way a member of a casino campaign participant would not hype the signature he is in. Like stake for example is one of the best casinos we have on the forum. We have others like Roobet etc but I will hype stake as number one and outstanding given the long time performance through the years in terms of numbers of games, cs etc
I agree with you on this they are the casino of choice by the majority of gamblers, not because I'm part of the signature campaign it just so happens but they are backed by fact another good casino that I'm actively playing and investing in since they have their own native token for their staking feature is Betfury, I'm glad I'm part of the campaign of this casinos when they are newly launch because I manage to earn their token which I used for staking.
I think this is going to be a biase review because there is no way a member of a casino campaign participant would not hype the signature he is in. Like stake for example is one of the best casinos we have on the forum. We have others like Roobet etc but I will hype stake as number one and outstanding given the long time performance through the years in terms of numbers of games, cs etc
Agree with you on the possibility of getting a biased result from such ratings, most especially in this space where we have categories of casinos that provide us with their unique services, but of anyone want to get the true result from such act then the ops could select a handful of forum members and pay them to get their reviews and that will be on a special reviews job, because that is the only means to get such rating unbiased.
I play on different casino and I experience the same satisfaction and peace of mind while playing on them.
These casinos are:
Duelbits
Livecasino
Stake
Gamdom
Rollbit
Chips
Roobet
They have interactive support system and is prompt in answering inquiries. Their site and games are also loading fine and I hardly experience any lagging while playing on their platform. I am not fond of reward claiming so I don not know how good each casinos reward system is. I only claim them when they are available but I do not aim for them seriously.
These casinos are:
Duelbits
Livecasino
Stake
Gamdom
Rollbit
Chips
Roobet
They have interactive support system and is prompt in answering inquiries. Their site and games are also loading fine and I hardly experience any lagging while playing on their platform. I am not fond of reward claiming so I don not know how good each casinos reward system is. I only claim them when they are available but I do not aim for them seriously.
I think this is going to be a biase review because there is no way a member of a casino campaign participant would not hype the signature he is in. Like stake for example is one of the best casinos we have on the forum. We have others like Roobet etc but I will hype stake as number one and outstanding given the long time performance through the years in terms of numbers of games, cs etc
Reting may not be applicable in these context because some of us uses more than one gambling casinos and we wouldn't want to rate one over the other because we are using them both as they keep on serving us better, also, should some of us rate the casinos we promote or be biased not to rate other gambling casinos because we are already promoting one, maybe in this regard, a list of 3 best could be presented in which one of the three must constitute from the ones we promote and use, ratings could also varies base on each user's experience.
You're right not some but many of us use more than one gambling casinos and a few of us are at more than 5 gambling casinos at average. That's why I agree with you that rating one over the other won't be unbiased as in most cases the casinos that we use offer good services and picking one over the others may not be fair. I believe that list should contain at least top 10 casinos that a user plays at because some users enjoying gambling a lot and that's why they have accounts at many casinos.
Ratings can be biased because they are based on individual experiences, and we never know the credibility of the rater. The poster above is right; just check their ANN thread. If you don't see any bad feedback and the thread is active with forum members of higher ranks sharing their feedback and participating in discussions, that's an indication that they are a reputable gambling site.
In addition, casino ratings can be paid so that the casino will look credible to the eyes of the gamblers. So if you want legit and not fake ratings, visit their ANN thread so you will know how most of the gamblers have experienced playing in that certain casino. And if this casino is still credible and reputable up to these days as some ratings might be too old for us to believe.We have our own reviews when it comes to casinos/sportsbookies and here is mine.
1. Stake.com
2. Sportsbet.io - always my next choice when I cannot find the game/sport I will bet on Stake.com. (reasons: late input most of the time.)
3. Bitsler
Most of the time I stop at Sportsbet.io and I can find what I am looking for.
To OP, you might want to just test these names that will be given to you by different members then create your own ratings if you want. If you still have spare time, edit the first post and share it with us too. Might be helpful someday to other members especially the new ones so they won't make an effort at creating a new thread like this. Although I believe they still will as the thread gets buried deep. That just happens normally here and they won't dig deep, creating a new discussion will be faster.
Ratings can be biased because they are based on individual experiences, and we never know the credibility of the rater. The poster above is right; just check their ANN thread. If you don't see any bad feedback and the thread is active with forum members of higher ranks sharing their feedback and participating in discussions, that's an indication that they are a reputable gambling site.
In addition, casino ratings can be paid so that the casino will look credible to the eyes of the gamblers. So if you want legit and not fake ratings, visit their ANN thread so you will know how most of the gamblers have experienced playing in that certain casino. And if this casino is still credible and reputable up to these days as some ratings might be too old for us to believe. 
I play on BitCasino.io
What is your opinion?
Not a bad choice for you, basically we have our own challenges in every casino we have ever played, in terms of interface, security and so on, but if you want to see a little about the ranking of the casinos that users generally play at here, I think you can review them here.What is your opinion?
* Topic: what are the best crypto casinos!
* Topic: List Of Crypto Casinos with The Best Faucets
That's just part of what I'm showing, there are dozens of reviews of new and old casinos you can find on the gambling/service board, if you want, just visit there.
Bottom line: we have our own reviews of the casinos we play at, you ask about your own rating and don't tell us about your experience, make a review of your rating first on the BitCasino.io casino, then we will make our review.
Ratings can be biased because they are based on individual experiences, and we never know the credibility of the rater. The poster above is right; just check their ANN thread. If you don't see any bad feedback and the thread is active with forum members of higher ranks sharing their feedback and participating in discussions, that's an indication that they are a reputable gambling site.
Reting may not be applicable in these context because some of us uses more than one gambling casinos and we wouldn't want to rate one over the other because we are using them both as they keep on serving us better, also, should some of us rate the casinos we promote or be biased not to rate other gambling casinos because we are already promoting one, maybe in this regard, a list of 3 best could be presented in which one of the three must constitute from the ones we promote and use, ratings could also varies base on each user's experience.
Hi
Lets rate btc casinos)
Please write about your exp. and rate it (1-10)
For casino important: safety, good and easy interface and a lot of games)
I play on BitCasino.io
What is your opinion?
Calling for the rating of a casino that we bearly have interactions is quite out of the space and for that there is a way and approach you need to follow if you want members of the forum to have a review or rating of your site, it's fine to see that you may have one or two members of the forum who may be using your site bit then the majority of us here don't know anything about the casino you mentioned and for that, you may have to employ other means to attract attention. Lets rate btc casinos)
Please write about your exp. and rate it (1-10)
For casino important: safety, good and easy interface and a lot of games)
I play on BitCasino.io
What is your opinion?
I think the ratings of each casino you can find in their ANN page although this can be a good addition to that.I also play only at Stake and another casino but I see no difficulties at all checking the email once a day during the 13th to 22th of the month,days in which the monthly is.
I also don't think the menu is difficult to understand,they tell you just click the blue button and claim,of course it is better to be in a desktop where you are already logged in into Stake so you can claim right away.
I also don't think the menu is difficult to understand,they tell you just click the blue button and claim,of course it is better to be in a desktop where you are already logged in into Stake so you can claim right away.
Hi
Lets rate btc casinos)
Please write about your exp. and rate it (1-10)
For casino important: safety, good and easy interface and a lot of games)
I play on BitCasino.io
What is your opinion?
Lets rate btc casinos)
Please write about your exp. and rate it (1-10)
For casino important: safety, good and easy interface and a lot of games)
I play on BitCasino.io
What is your opinion?
Jump to: