Author

Topic: CCminer palgin's mod (alexis78 fork) (Read 10256 times)

jr. member
Activity: 275
Merit: 3
February 13, 2018, 10:56:42 AM
#52
[2018-02-13 18:51:54] GPU#1:invalid argument
[2018-02-13 18:51:54] GPU#0:invalid argument
[2018-02-13 18:51:54] GPU#3:result for 7afb0020 does not validate on CPU!
[2018-02-13 18:51:54] GPU#3:an illegal memory access was encountered
[2018-02-13 18:51:54] GPU#1:an illegal memory access was encountered
[2018-02-13 18:51:54] GPU#0:an illegal memory access was encountered
Cuda error in func 'quark_blake512_cpu_setBlock_80' at line 547 : an illegal memory access was encountered.


Can prompt in what a problem, cuda it is installed and on other majnery all is good?
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
January 29, 2018, 11:04:26 PM
#51
anyone that could share 1.1.1  for windows 10 or know where I could download it? all I see for 1.1.1 is a source code zip, from what I've gathered in other posts there might be a way to build what I need from the contents of the source zip. I've tried running the build and config files within the zip and reading through the readme's for clues how to make this have but this appears to be beyond my scope... any help or advise would be greatly appreciated, thanks.
newbie
Activity: 106
Merit: 0
January 23, 2018, 10:16:08 PM
#50
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
January 13, 2018, 12:40:31 PM
#49
struggling to compile this for linux, ccminer/alexis-1.1_palginmod. please could someone upload the linux compiled binaries on cuda 8 theres a huge performance difference with the coin im mining, thanks
full member
Activity: 350
Merit: 100
XDNA - Most innovative cryptocurrency in 2018
January 06, 2018, 11:25:57 AM
#48
Didn‘t work for me. Just a cmd window popup, that‘s all.

 Huh

check you windows defender
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
January 05, 2018, 09:44:31 AM
#47
I cannot compile this on ubuntu 16.04 running ./build.sh

Ideas how to solve this?

Code:
ptxas info    : Function properties for _Z23nv2_scrypt_core_kernelAILi0EEvPjii
    0 bytes stack frame, 0 bytes spill stores, 0 bytes spill loads
ptxas info    : Used 121 registers, 336 bytes cmem[0]
ptxas info    : Compiling entry function '_Z26nv2_scrypt_core_kernelB_LGILi0EEvPjiij' for 'sm_52'
ptxas info    : Function properties for _Z26nv2_scrypt_core_kernelB_LGILi0EEvPjiij
    0 bytes stack frame, 0 bytes spill stores, 0 bytes spill loads
ptxas info    : Used 106 registers, 340 bytes cmem[0]
ptxas info    : Compiling entry function '_Z26nv2_scrypt_core_kernelA_LGILi0EEvPjiij' for 'sm_52'
ptxas info    : Function properties for _Z26nv2_scrypt_core_kernelA_LGILi0EEvPjiij
    0 bytes stack frame, 0 bytes spill stores, 0 bytes spill loads
ptxas info    : Used 96 registers, 340 bytes cmem[0]
ptxas info    : Overriding global maxrregcount 128 with entry-specific value 72 computed using thread count
ptxas info    : Overriding global maxrregcount 128 with entry-specific value 72 computed using thread count
ptxas info    : 0 bytes gmem, 4224 bytes cmem[3]
ptxas info    : Compiling entry function '_Z26x11_shavite512_gpu_hash_80jjPv' for 'sm_52'
ptxas info    : Function properties for _Z26x11_shavite512_gpu_hash_80jjPv
    56 bytes stack frame, 104 bytes spill stores, 116 bytes spill loads
ptxas info    : Used 72 registers, 4096 bytes smem, 336 bytes cmem[0], 76 bytes cmem[2]
ptxas info    : Compiling entry function '_Z26x11_shavite512_gpu_hash_64jjPmPj' for 'sm_52'
ptxas info    : Function properties for _Z26x11_shavite512_gpu_hash_64jjPmPj
    0 bytes stack frame, 0 bytes spill stores, 0 bytes spill loads
ptxas info    : Used 72 registers, 4096 bytes smem, 344 bytes cmem[0], 72 bytes cmem[2]
g++  -O3 -march=native -D_REENTRANT -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16 -pthread -L/usr/local/cuda/lib64 -ldl  -o ccminer ccminer-crc32.o ccminer-hefty1.o ccminer-ccminer.o ccminer-pools.o ccminer-util.o ccminer-bench.o ccminer-bignum.o ccminer-api.o ccminer-hashlog.o ccminer-nvml.o ccminer-stats.o ccminer-sysinfos.o ccminer-cuda.o equi/ccminer-equi-stratum.o equi/ccminer-equi.o equi/blake2/ccminer-blake2bx.o equi/ccminer-equihash.o equi/cuda_equi.o heavy/heavy.o heavy/cuda_blake512.o heavy/cuda_combine.o heavy/cuda_groestl512.o heavy/cuda_hefty1.o heavy/cuda_keccak512.o heavy/cuda_sha256.o heavy/bastion.o heavy/cuda_bastion.o ccminer-fuguecoin.o Algo256/cuda_fugue256.o sph/ccminer-fugue.o ccminer-groestlcoin.o cuda_groestlcoin.o ccminer-myriadgroestl.o cuda_myriadgroestl.o lyra2/ccminer-Lyra2.o lyra2/ccminer-Sponge.o lyra2/lyra2RE.o lyra2/cuda_lyra2.o lyra2/lyra2REv2.o lyra2/cuda_lyra2v2.o lyra2/ccminer-Lyra2Z.o lyra2/lyra2Z.o lyra2/cuda_lyra2Z.o Algo256/cuda_bmw256.o Algo256/cuda_cubehash256.o Algo256/cuda_blake256.o Algo256/cuda_groestl256.o Algo256/cuda_keccak256.o Algo256/cuda_skein256.o Algo256/blake256.o Algo256/decred.o Algo256/vanilla.o Algo256/keccak256.o Algo256/blake2s.o sph/ccminer-blake2s.o Algo256/bmw.o Algo256/cuda_bmw.o crypto/ccminer-xmr-rpc.o crypto/ccminer-wildkeccak-cpu.o crypto/wildkeccak.o crypto/cryptolight.o crypto/cryptolight-core.o crypto/ccminer-cryptolight-cpu.o crypto/cryptonight.o crypto/cryptonight-core.o crypto/cryptonight-extra.o crypto/ccminer-cryptonight-cpu.o crypto/ccminer-oaes_lib.o crypto/ccminer-aesb.o crypto/cpu/ccminer-c_keccak.o JHA/jackpotcoin.o JHA/cuda_jha_keccak512.o JHA/cuda_jha_compactionTest.o cuda_checkhash.o quark/cuda_jh512.o quark/cuda_quark_blake512.o quark/cuda_quark_groestl512.o quark/cuda_skein512.o quark/cuda_bmw512.o quark/cuda_quark_keccak512.o quark/nist5.o quark/quarkcoin.o quark/cuda_quark_compactionTest.o neoscrypt/ccminer-neoscrypt.o neoscrypt/ccminer-neoscrypt-cpu.o neoscrypt/cuda_neoscrypt.o pentablake.o skein.o cuda_skeincoin.o ccminer-skein2.o zr5.o sha256/sha256d.o sha256/cuda_sha256d.o sha256/sha256t.o sha256/cuda_sha256t.o sia/sia.o sia/ccminer-sia-rpc.o sph/ccminer-blake2b.o sph/ccminer-bmw.o sph/ccminer-blake.o sph/ccminer-groestl.o sph/ccminer-jh.o sph/ccminer-keccak.o sph/ccminer-skein.o sph/ccminer-cubehash.o sph/ccminer-echo.o sph/ccminer-luffa.o sph/ccminer-sha2.o sph/ccminer-shavite.o sph/ccminer-simd.o sph/ccminer-hamsi.o sph/ccminer-hamsi_helper.o sph/ccminer-streebog.o sph/ccminer-shabal.o sph/ccminer-whirlpool.o sph/ccminer-sha2big.o sph/ccminer-haval.o sph/ccminer-ripemd.o sph/ccminer-sph_sha2.o lbry/lbry.o lbry/cuda_sha256_lbry.o lbry/cuda_sha512_lbry.o lbry/cuda_lbry_merged.o qubit/qubit.o qubit/qubit_luffa512.o qubit/deep.o qubit/luffa.o x11/x11.o x11/fresh.o x11/cuda_x11_luffa512.o x11/cuda_x11_cubehash512.o x11/cuda_x11_shavite512.o x11/cuda_x11_simd512.o x11/cuda_x11_echo.o x11/cuda_x11_luffa512_Cubehash.o x11/x11evo.o x11/timetravel.o x11/bitcore.o x13/x13.o x13/cuda_x13_hamsi512.o x13/cuda_x13_fugue512.o x15/x14.o x15/x15.o x15/cuda_x14_shabal512.o x15/cuda_x15_whirlpool.o x15/whirlpool.o x15/cuda_x15_whirlpool_sm3.o x17/x17.o x17/hmq17.o x17/cuda_x17_haval256.o x17/cuda_x17_sha512.o x11/c11.o x11/s3.o x11/sib.o x11/veltor.o x11/cuda_streebog.o ccminer-scrypt.o ccminer-scrypt-jane.o scrypt/blake.o scrypt/keccak.o scrypt/sha256.o scrypt/salsa_kernel.o scrypt/test_kernel.o scrypt/fermi_kernel.o scrypt/kepler_kernel.o scrypt/nv_kernel.o scrypt/nv_kernel2.o scrypt/titan_kernel.o  -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu -lcurl -ljansson -lpthread -lcudart -fopenmp -lcrypto -lssl -lz  -ldl -lcuda -lcrypto -lssl -lz
ccminer-ccminer.o: In function `miner_thread(void*)':
ccminer.cpp:(.text+0x7b75): undefined reference to `scanhash_timetravel10'
ccminer-util.o: In function `print_hash_tests':
util.cpp:(.text+0x7a29): undefined reference to `timetravel10_hash'
ccminer-bench.o: In function `algo_free_all':
bench.cpp:(.text+0x215): undefined reference to `free_timetravel10'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Makefile:1128: recipe for target 'ccminer' failed
make[2]: *** [ccminer] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory '/root/ccminerBWK/ccminer'
Makefile:2113: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/root/ccminerBWK/ccminer'
Makefile:631: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 2
root@Jmine:~/ccminer/ccminer#
copper member
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
January 03, 2018, 11:08:05 AM
#46
Does  anybody have a copy of this miner for me?
https://www.sendspace.com/file/o9h81s

Im so confused if I should be using this miner anymore. It was giving me top hashrates on many algorithms.
Check my thread here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/gpumining/comments/7nr8hd/which_miner_should_i_use_a_handy_guide/

So, if he was removing some needed buckets.... should I use this or not?
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
December 27, 2017, 04:32:32 PM
#45
Does  anybody have a copy of this miner for me?
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
December 27, 2017, 04:08:02 PM
#44
I tried to compile it with doubleclicking the Build.cmd file under win10.

Win10 cmd window shows up but closes immediately. Do I need to install visual studio or something like that to compile it myself?

member
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
Do or do not.
December 27, 2017, 02:13:49 PM
#43
Didn‘t work for me. Just a cmd window popup, that‘s all.

 Huh

On lnx one of the best miners imho. What exactly didn't work?
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
December 27, 2017, 02:07:57 PM
#42
Didn‘t work for me. Just a cmd window popup, that‘s all.

 Huh
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
December 27, 2017, 08:59:32 AM
#41
...
newbie
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
December 26, 2017, 05:42:27 PM
#40
Is there also a Windows version?


Interested in this as well.
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
December 26, 2017, 05:38:21 PM
#39
Is there also a Windows version?
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
December 26, 2017, 08:58:03 AM
#38
...
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
December 26, 2017, 07:50:07 AM
#37
Does  anyone have a copy of palgins mod?
Cant find it on github any more

Thx
sr. member
Activity: 512
Merit: 260
October 20, 2017, 09:20:51 PM
#36
 keep up the good work! Wink
sr. member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 273
September 19, 2017, 01:02:28 AM
#35
Could be a great project, if it supports so many algos, but currently has lower hashrate than "ccminer alexis"
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
August 18, 2017, 12:49:43 PM
#34
I got "Unable to query number of CUDA devices! Is an nVidia driver installed?" on latest release 1.1.1
Never got that before, previous release is ok.
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
May 09, 2017, 10:36:21 PM
#33
Just my testing:

http://i63.tinypic.com/2r6377c.jpg

http://i63.tinypic.com/2pplu0h.jpg

Speed in Windows is differently showed on pool.

This mining tool is currently highest number for my card than others!
legendary
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
May 09, 2017, 02:20:44 PM
#32
In case anyone is interested, i've added support on suprnova (currently ZEC & KMD) for this miner variant as well...

Is it still available for download ?

THE BINARIES HAVE BEEN REMOVED--

Palgin may revisit the project later.  He stated from the start that it was a test project.       --scryptr
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1240
May 09, 2017, 11:22:05 AM
#31
In case anyone is interested, i've added support on suprnova (currently ZEC & KMD) for this miner variant as well...

Is it still available for download ?
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
May 09, 2017, 08:31:14 AM
#30
I think you easily know which changes I did, no need to pretend something...

Did you implement the todo: in the code?
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 520
May 09, 2017, 08:21:24 AM
#29
I don't mind you work on my work, in fact, I encourage it. Sadly, nobody picked up yet. But what I don't like is people breaking the license we put in with a purpose. You can mod as much as you like, but you have to disclose the source.

Why don't you opensource the latest changes in excavegator. The opensource nheqminer is 10% slower..

I think you easily know which changes I did, no need to pretend something...
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
May 09, 2017, 08:19:19 AM
#28
Otherwise, people would just sell open work with little or no modifications.

Nobody want's to buy if the speed isn't improved.

When you optimize you often you need to try 10 different approaches to gain speed, so a few lines of code can take 100hours to make. because the 9 first attempts didn't work.

It wasn't directed to you: you know how much you worked on the code, I don't need to teach you anything.
Still, the license is the license.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
May 09, 2017, 08:08:28 AM
#27
Otherwise, people would just sell open work with little or no modifications.

Nobody want's to buy if the speed isn't improved.

When you optimize you often you need to try 10 different approaches to gain speed, so a few lines of code can take 100hours to make. because the 9 first attempts didn't work.

legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
May 09, 2017, 05:58:35 AM
#26
This is key gap in GPL. Instead of being a single standard (like BSD-Sockets or POSIX), most programmers are forced to write a new solution from scratch every time. Year after year. Because a lot of opensource stuff can be only "GPL opensource stuff". Religion fanatic wars for "freedom", where not freedom. Not public domain license.

I ask once again to think each programmer over licensing wars and stop writing the GPL. And start write Public Domain stuff for each human. Otherwise, we will continue to write shit code for decades (Just for fan!) without achieving a good result, while having hundreds of weak solutions.

I don't see what's wrong with "I publish my work with sources for free and want others, who build upon it, do the same".
Otherwise, people would just sell open work with little or no modifications.
If everybody publishes the sources, there is no violation and everybody is free to do what they want.
OZR
sr. member
Activity: 281
Merit: 250
You're in my wonderland!
May 09, 2017, 05:49:31 AM
#25
This is key gap in GPL. Instead of being a single standard (like BSD-Sockets or POSIX), most programmers are forced to write a new solution from scratch every time. Year after year. Because a lot of opensource stuff can be only "GPL opensource stuff". Religion fanatic wars for "freedom", where not freedom. Not public domain license.

I ask once again to think each programmer over licensing wars and stop writing the GPL. And start write Public Domain stuff for each human. Otherwise, we will continue to write shit code for decades (Just for fun!) without achieving a good result, while having hundreds of weak solutions.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
May 09, 2017, 05:28:59 AM
#24
timetravel-algo seems to be broken
got "booo" (low difficulty share) with palgin`s mod ccminer only  Sad

Did you choose -a option correctly? In my mod -a timetravel is original one and -a timetravel10 is for BitCore...
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
May 09, 2017, 04:41:56 AM
#23
I don't mind you work on my work, in fact, I encourage it. Sadly, nobody picked up yet. But what I don't like is people breaking the license we put in with a purpose. You can mod as much as you like, but you have to disclose the source.

Why don't you opensource the latest changes in excavegator. The opensource nheqminer is 10% slower..
legendary
Activity: 2026
Merit: 1005
May 09, 2017, 04:33:39 AM
#22
timetravel-algo seems to be broken
got "booo" (low difficulty share) with palgin`s mod ccminer only  Sad
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 520
May 09, 2017, 04:33:18 AM
#21
What you most likely did to achieve high speed is to make buckets smaller. This can of course greatly speed up everything, and displayed iterations are high, but on pool, you will get slow speed. These buckets sizes are there for a reason and not something you can simply shed off and benefit.

I also don't understand why would you have pool issues; equihash protocol is standardized, every pool works if it follows official zcash stratum specifications.

Also, we have released the source under GPL v3 and you are obligated to disclose full source when distributing the bins...

Yes, you're right, that's exactly what I've done and found that won't work the right way, I'm still learning and practicing my skills, sorry for practicing on your work, which is highly appreciated by me. I've already removed the bins, think it's time to try to write my own kernels from the scratch, SKL and MKL versions.

I don't mind you work on my work, in fact, I encourage it. Sadly, nobody picked up yet. But what I don't like is people breaking the license we put in with a purpose. You can mod as much as you like, but you have to disclose the source.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
May 09, 2017, 02:24:50 AM
#20
What you most likely did to achieve high speed is to make buckets smaller. This can of course greatly speed up everything, and displayed iterations are high, but on pool, you will get slow speed. These buckets sizes are there for a reason and not something you can simply shed off and benefit.

I also don't understand why would you have pool issues; equihash protocol is standardized, every pool works if it follows official zcash stratum specifications.

Also, we have released the source under GPL v3 and you are obligated to disclose full source when distributing the bins...

Yes, you're right, that's exactly what I've done and found that won't work the right way, I'm still learning and practicing my skills, sorry for practicing on your work, which is highly appreciated by me. I've already removed the bins, think it's time to try to write my own kernels from the scratch, SKL and MKL versions.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 520
May 08, 2017, 03:53:31 PM
#19
What you most likely did to achieve high speed is to make buckets smaller. This can of course greatly speed up everything, and displayed iterations are high, but on pool, you will get slow speed. These buckets sizes are there for a reason and not something you can simply shed off and benefit.

I also don't understand why would you have pool issues; equihash protocol is standardized, every pool works if it follows official zcash stratum specifications.

Also, we have released the source under GPL v3 and you are obligated to disclose full source when distributing the bins...
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
May 08, 2017, 01:05:22 PM
#18
The results doesn't seem to validate on the pool.

When I run 4 instances I get high numbers on all the windows, but on the pool low numbers..
Low difficulty seem to make the miner more stable.

launch batfile:

:loop
ccminer -a equihash -o stratum+tcp://equihash.mine.zpool.ca:2142 -u 1CTiNJyoUmbdMRACtteRWXhGqtSETYd6Vd -i 20 -p d=32
goto loop


Thanks, I found the reason in unsafe shared mem operations I used in kernel, working on a solution, but it will take long to make it safe without huge affect on speed.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
May 08, 2017, 12:46:08 PM
#17
The results doesn't seem to validate on the pool.

When I run 4 instances I get high numbers on all the windows, but on the pool low numbers..
Low difficulty seem to make the miner more stable.

launch batfile:

:loop
ccminer -a equihash -o stratum+tcp://equihash.mine.zpool.ca:2142 -u 1CTiNJyoUmbdMRACtteRWXhGqtSETYd6Vd -i 20 -p d=32
goto loop
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
May 08, 2017, 12:18:29 PM
#16
[2017-05-08 19:17:38] accepted: 19/19 (diff 6.005), 258.94 H/s yes!
[2017-05-08 19:17:39] GPU #0: solver: CUDA error 'an illegal memory access was encountered' in func 'eq_cuda_context::so
lve' line 2054
[2017-05-08 19:17:41] GPU #0: an illegal memory access was encountered
[2017-05-08 19:17:41] GPU #0: scanhash_equihash:188 all CUDA-capable devices are busy or unavailable
[2017-05-08 19:17:41] GPU #0: init: CUDA: failed to alloc memory
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
May 08, 2017, 12:04:10 PM
#15
are you planning to boost some algo?,sweepstakecoin this new coin has the old JHA algo, which could see a boost i think

Maybe in future, currently I'm sitting counting days to my vacation trip and don't have enough work to do, so I decided to practice my skills and try adding something to crypto community, also I'm a miner myself (not so huge as SP, only 20x5 Nvidia cards farms).
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1072
May 08, 2017, 11:54:45 AM
#14
are you planning to boost some algo?,sweepstakecoin this new coin has the old JHA algo, which could see a boost i think
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
May 08, 2017, 11:40:25 AM
#13

ubuntu 16.04 build error

make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'x11/bitcore.cu', needed by 'x11/bitcore.o'.  Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/home2/btx'
Makefile:2113: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/home2/btx'
Makefile:631: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 2


Ooops, haven't mention that I'm new to github and can forget something here and there, change bitcore.cu to timetravel10.cu in makefile.am and this should be fine. Anyway, I'm working only on "windows" branch right now, can't guarantee you'll  be able to build this under Linux systems.
full member
Activity: 162
Merit: 100
May 08, 2017, 11:39:23 AM
#12
v3 with some gtx 1070 gives about 530sols and after a few minutes... crashs.....
zjy
newbie
Activity: 66
Merit: 0
May 08, 2017, 11:27:13 AM
#11
Will start my own thread, can't guarantee I'd be able to keep it up-to-date.

My mod is 1:1 tpruvot's version, except timetravel10 and Equihash algos, maybe there'll be future mods to other algos as well. I won't release Equihash kernel source on GitHub until stable release

Latest releases (and pre-releases):

https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases

Currently really need testers with different equipment to help me debug Equihash kernel momory issues, seems kinda unstable right now.

If you'd like to help, download latest pre-release and post your results here. Check all 3 versions, post speed without overclock, speed with overclock (with core+/mem+ values) and crash output (if occures).

Newbie acc, I know, but I'll try my best  Cheesy

P.S: sorry for my bad English, not my primary language.

ubuntu 16.04 build error

make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'x11/bitcore.cu', needed by 'x11/bitcore.o'.  Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/home2/btx'
Makefile:2113: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/home2/btx'
Makefile:631: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 2
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
May 08, 2017, 11:23:59 AM
#10
As I thought, ~15% of memory-related operations give wrong results (v1 inspection):

https://ibb.co/c6Eb85

Should replace unsafe memory operations another way, need some time to think about workaround for this.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
May 08, 2017, 11:20:46 AM
#9
[2017-05-08 18:19:35] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-05-08 18:19:35] Starting on stratum+tcp://eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
[2017-05-08 18:19:36] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-05-08 18:19:36] 1 miner thread started, using 'equihash' algorithm.
[2017-05-08 18:19:36] Failed to get extranonce2_size
[2017-05-08 18:19:36] Failed to get extranonce2_size
[2017-05-08 18:19:36] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2017-05-08 18:20:06] Failed to get extranonce2_size
[2017-05-08 18:20:18] Failed to get extranonce2_size
[2017-05-08 18:20:18] ...retry after 30 seconds

sr. member
Activity: 463
Merit: 250
May 08, 2017, 11:16:32 AM
#8
On zpool I am getting the same hashrate as @miner, but v2 and v3 crash with illegal memory access error very fast ( usually lasts less than 2 mins), v1 works well so far.

v1 635 H/s with same settings as above.
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
May 08, 2017, 10:42:49 AM
#7
will be compiling and testing sometime this week if we can ...

new cards are coming this week also - so will check the miner on those also ...

#crysx
full member
Activity: 304
Merit: 100
May 08, 2017, 10:39:22 AM
#6
on 1070 version 1 gives ~560 h/s
versions 2 and 3 gives 580 and 610 h/s, but often crashes , and pool hashrate same as version 1


oops, version 1 crashed too ))
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
May 08, 2017, 10:38:35 AM
#5
How fast is it on the gtx 1070? The fastest private kernels are doing 550 with low power.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
May 08, 2017, 10:25:10 AM
#4
I appreciate any feedback, thank you! For me pool-side speed correlates in time with miner shown, but it crashes in 15-30 mins from start, not fully safe memory operations, need to check block-sync again and again and find another way to perform less operations with more stability. Anyway, I'm still learning and this is not practically used instrument at that moment  Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 463
Merit: 250
May 08, 2017, 10:12:19 AM
#3
As I have already wrote in PM. I have tested two versions on the MSI GTX 1080, mining hush on Yiimp. power limit 65% ( 150W), +160 core clock (2088) , +537 Mhz ( 5049) memory.

Getting about 820 sols with v3, 730 sols with v2. Both stable, but on pool after 30 mins of mining still showing under 400 sols on pool for version 3. For v2 350 sols.

Also according to GPU-Z it seems that there is only 80-86% GPU load so running more instances would probably help?.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
May 08, 2017, 09:58:46 AM
#2
watching this! thanks!
will be testing on linux as soon as sources are available.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
May 08, 2017, 09:40:43 AM
#1
Will start my own thread, can't guarantee I'd be able to keep it up-to-date, but anyway.

My mod now is based on alexis78 version, but lots of algos reworked.

Currently supported algos:

blake      
decred      
blakecoin
gostd  
vcash
blake2s  
keccak
lyra2  
lyra2v2  
skein  
skein2  
skunk  
nist5
quark
qubit
x11
c11
sib
x11evo
x13
x14
x15
x17
whirlpool
lbry
neoscrypt
sia
myr-gr
veltor

Latest releases (and pre-releases):

https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases

Jump to: