spmod-git #4 is faster, free and opensource
here is spmod-git #3 in a 9 hour comparison between the 3 mods.
Enemy 1.09 beta 5 was compiled just after I released #3. (He use my github code and add the speedups to his private fee miner)
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 51. (Read 2347588 times)
1 week ago enemy v1.08 was the fastest downloadable x16r miner.
spmod-git #4 is faster, free and opensource
here is spmod-git #3 in a 9 hour comparison between the 3 mods.
Enemy 1.09 beta 5 was compiled just after I released #3. (He use my github code and add the speedups to his private fee miner)
spmod-git #4 is faster, free and opensource
here is spmod-git #3 in a 9 hour comparison between the 3 mods.
Enemy 1.09 beta 5 was compiled just after I released #3. (He use my github code and add the speedups to his private fee miner)
i'm getting 13.5mh with x16r on 1070ti at 60% tdp +100 core 400 mem, what are you guys getting?
Im doing 8mh with normal 1070 with this settings.. (x16r not x16s)
i'm getting 13.5mh with x16r on 1070ti at 60% tdp +100 core 400 mem, what are you guys getting?
Depends on the sequence numbers, and how long you meassure the average rate. Testing for a few hours isn't enough. Testing x16S is more accurate, since the order is permuted and not random (every hashing algo excecuted once)
in X16S you have 16! combinations (2.092278988 E+13), in X16R 16^16 (1.8 E+18)
Pushed more speed to github (x16R, X16S)
When simd is the previous algo in the chain:
Fugue64 +26% faster
Whirlpool64 +40% faster
Hamsi64 +40% faster
https://github.com/sp-hash/suprminer/releases/tag/spmod-git4
When simd is the previous algo in the chain:
Fugue64 +26% faster
Whirlpool64 +40% faster
Hamsi64 +40% faster
https://github.com/sp-hash/suprminer/releases/tag/spmod-git4
i'm getting 13.5mh with x16r on 1070ti at 60% tdp +100 core 400 mem, what are you guys getting?
I pushed a 4% faster fugue to github + some pool tuning. Run with fixed difficulty on the pool.
The enemy dude is taking my optimized code and merge it into his 1.09 exe file. (1% fee miner)
I have only shared speedups in 8 of the 16 algos. My private can beat beat enemy 1.09 r5 with 10% dev fee.
The enemy dude is taking my optimized code and merge it into his 1.09 exe file. (1% fee miner)
I have only shared speedups in 8 of the 16 algos. My private can beat beat enemy 1.09 r5 with 10% dev fee.
10% dev fee?!
sp_ you know 1.09 was out to alfa testers before your open love
1.09 has 5 release numbers. #5 was released yesterday after my latest commits-.
sp_ you know 1.09 was out to alfa testers before your open love
I pushed a 4% faster fugue to github + some pool tuning. Run with fixed difficulty on the pool.
The enemy dude is taking my optimized code and merge it into his 1.09 exe file. (1% fee miner)
I have only shared speedups in 8 of the 16 algos. My private can beat beat enemy 1.09 r5 with 10% dev fee.
The enemy dude is taking my optimized code and merge it into his 1.09 exe file. (1% fee miner)
I have only shared speedups in 8 of the 16 algos. My private can beat beat enemy 1.09 r5 with 10% dev fee.
750ti CARDS STABLE AT AN INTENSITY OF 14--
My EVGA GTX 750ti SC cards have been running for several hours on the latest SPmod commit with no apparent problems. They hash at 65-75kH/W, and 1.7kH/s to 2.XkH/s apiece. I just started the CPU miner on the 6x 750ti rig to see if there is any impact. Currently, the cards are running at 30-33W each, reported at the console via nvidia-smi. And, for some reason, my pre-compiled windows release (SPMOD-GIT #3) does not report hash/W in the console window for my 1080ti; it is hashing at an intensity of 21 and stable overnight. None of my cards are overclocked. The 750ti cards are on a Lubuntu 16.04 system with CUDA ToolKit 9.1.
I have lowered the intensity on my 750ti cards from 15 to 14 (intensity 15 performance was reported earlier). At the higher intensity, the hash reports at the console for the individual GPUs were unreliable, and did not match submitted/accepted hash reports. On the other hand, the max intensity setting for my 1080ti is 21. Any higher and the miner crashes.
The total hash rate at the pool for both miners trends in the neighborhood of ~20 to 35MH/s (at times over 40MH/s). Still too early for any big conclusions, but the Free Open Source (FOS) builds are a breath of fresh air. Hecklers should depart this thread and go throw rotten tomatoes at the Enemy. --scryptr
My EVGA GTX 750ti SC cards have been running for several hours on the latest SPmod commit with no apparent problems. They hash at 65-75kH/W, and 1.7kH/s to 2.XkH/s apiece. I just started the CPU miner on the 6x 750ti rig to see if there is any impact. Currently, the cards are running at 30-33W each, reported at the console via nvidia-smi. And, for some reason, my pre-compiled windows release (SPMOD-GIT #3) does not report hash/W in the console window for my 1080ti; it is hashing at an intensity of 21 and stable overnight. None of my cards are overclocked. The 750ti cards are on a Lubuntu 16.04 system with CUDA ToolKit 9.1.
I have lowered the intensity on my 750ti cards from 15 to 14 (intensity 15 performance was reported earlier). At the higher intensity, the hash reports at the console for the individual GPUs were unreliable, and did not match submitted/accepted hash reports. On the other hand, the max intensity setting for my 1080ti is 21. Any higher and the miner crashes.
The total hash rate at the pool for both miners trends in the neighborhood of ~20 to 35MH/s (at times over 40MH/s). Still too early for any big conclusions, but the Free Open Source (FOS) builds are a breath of fresh air. Hecklers should depart this thread and go throw rotten tomatoes at the Enemy. --scryptr
what is the speed on 1070ti with the x16s mod, the new one?
sp-git2:
11,53 MH/s, pl 80%, core +125, mem +200
sp-git3:
12,63 MH/s, pl 80%, core +125, mem +200
The sp-mod x16r private is around 10% faster than enemy 1.09
SP,
are you willing to eat your dick on live webcam if its not faster than Enemy 1.09 ?
Just be a man of your words.... !!!!
are you willing to eat your dick on live webcam if its not faster than Enemy 1.09 ?
Just be a man of your words.... !!!!
released #3
Now the x16s spmod-git is the fastest free opensource pigeon miner without a fee
https://github.com/sp-hash/suprminer/releases/tag/spmod-git3
Now the x16s spmod-git is the fastest free opensource pigeon miner without a fee
https://github.com/sp-hash/suprminer/releases/tag/spmod-git3
what is the speed on 1070ti with the x16s mod, the new one?
11,53 MH/s, pl 80%, core +125, mem +200
what is the speed on 1070ti with the x16s mod, the new one?
When was the last time anything from sp_ produced this kind of an improvement FOR FREE?
When I did opensource work i pushed the most profitable algos at the time like quark +50% faster. for FREE. I have done my opensource part for the community. Time to move on and let the cuda students take over. 4-5 years ago mining was done by the few in their garage and basements. Today you have bigger farms, bigger coins, and more money invested in equipment. Improving the money maker for free doesn't make sense anymore.I have just released the fastest free x16r opensource fork @ github. What have you done the past few years? I heard that you have been working, but I haven't seen anything new for a long time yet. Why don't you share some tricks. Perhaps the cuda students can learn some and beat us.
he-he
I'm glad you started releasing opensource again. I didn't expect it, thanks!
Most of my work is on coins, recently: intense coin, cryptonite, but I also do some miners.
When was the last time anything from sp_ produced this kind of an improvement FOR FREE?
When I did opensource work i pushed the most profitable algos at the time like quark +50% faster. for FREE. I have done my opensource part for the community. Time to move on and let the cuda students take over. 4-5 years ago mining was done by the few in their garage and basements. Today you have bigger farms, bigger coins, and more money invested in equipment. Improving the money maker for free doesn't make sense anymore.I have just released the fastest free x16r opensource fork @ github. What have you done the past few years? I heard that you have been working, but I haven't seen anything new for a long time yet. Why don't you share some tricks. Perhaps the cuda students can learn some and beat us.
he-he
If the RVN market peaks again, I may do a more thorough comparison. My 750ti cards will be out of the game unless the software changes. They have other algos to mine. --scryptr
I don't have problems with my 750ti cards, but I don't oc, and run with 80% tdp. Stable for months. (sp-mod private)
I pushed a 60-70% improvement in the hamsi 80bit algo (github). Almost 3 times faster than the alexis hamsi 64bit
The hamsi 80bit is only used 1/16th of the time in x16r, so the speedup is only around +4%
I also added 38% more in the fugue 80bit (+60% faster than the tvpruvot original 80bit code)
The hamsi 80bit is only used 1/16th of the time in x16r, so the speedup is only around +4%
I also added 38% more in the fugue 80bit (+60% faster than the tvpruvot original 80bit code)
Jump to: