Topic: CEO pay has skyrocketed 1,460% since 1978 (Read 68 times)
Look at CEO pay skyrocketing along with other financial data since 1978 to present and you will get the real picture of wealth transfer. Hint, the middle class is getting raked across the coals.
It used to be very common for small business owners to label themselves "CEOs". I remember entrepreneurs owning a business where they were the only employee saying they were a CEO. That practice appears to be on a decline. It has been a long time since I have seen anyone do it. Is it possible that the public image of CEOs is on a decline?
The phrase Chief Executive Officer simply means a person that has the highest influence in the process of decision making of a company. There are democratic or autocratic CEOs but the bottom line is that the have the most powerful voice in a company. Most business owners in my locality seems to avoid the CEO title because they don't want people or client to view their business as a one man business. They prefer to take titles that might make clients assume that they are not the boss due to some personal reasons. I think the pay of CEO is always commensurate to the income or the worth of the company. You would not expect a rich company to have underpaid CEOs because they know how rich the firm is, hence they set their salaries based on the firm's financial strength. People also feel that if CEOs are not well paid they might be tempted to engage in fraudulent practices that might undermine the company. Hence they are well paid so that they can focus on their roles and maintain integrity.
It can't -just- be a coincidence that every government program has centralized more power and wealth to the elites.
There are some CEOs that opted to receive a minimum pay, but even that isn't impressive when you find out that they're doing this to avoid taxes and keep much of the bonuses that they receive as is. CEOs are, in today's day and age, figureheads/face of the company that doesn't do much in running the actual score. They're paid to exist there, and sometimes give out advice but the main decision making lies on the hands of the board of directors.
Heck, if there's a fast-track to becoming a CEO, I guess a lot of us will do that. The perks, pay, and everything else seems nice at the top at the expense of the workers and the underlings.
Heck, if there's a fast-track to becoming a CEO, I guess a lot of us will do that. The perks, pay, and everything else seems nice at the top at the expense of the workers and the underlings.
Quote
CEOs were paid 399 times as much as a typical worker in 2021
What this report finds: Corporate boards running America’s largest public firms are giving top executives outsize compensation packages that have grown much faster than the stock market and the pay of typical workers, college graduates, and even the top 0.1%. In 2021, we project that a CEO at one of the top 350 firms in the U.S. was paid $27.8 million on average (using a “realized” measure of CEO pay that counts stock awards when vested and stock options when cashed in and ownership is taken). This 11.1% increase from 2020 occurred because of rapid growth in vested stock awards. Using a different “granted” measure of CEO pay (which counts the value of stock awards and options when announced (or “granted” rather than realized), average top CEO compensation was $15.6 million in 2021, up 9.8% since 2020. In 2021, the ratio of CEO-to-typical-worker compensation was 399-to-1 under the realized measure of CEO pay; that is up from 366-to-1 in 2020 and a big increase from 20-to-1 in 1965 and 59-to-1 in 1989. CEOs are even making a lot more than other very high earners (wage earners in the top 0.1%)—almost seven times as much. From 1978 to 2021, CEO pay based on realized compensation grew by 1,460%, far outstripping S&P stock market growth (1,063%) and top 0.1% earnings growth (which was 385% between 1978 and 2020, according to the latest data available). In contrast, compensation of the typical worker grew by just 18.1% from 1978 to 2021.
Why it matters: Exorbitant CEO pay is a contributor to rising inequality that we could restrain without doing any damage to the wider economy. CEOs are getting ever-higher pay over time because of their power to set pay and because so much of their pay (more than 80%) is stock-related. They are not getting higher pay because they are becoming more productive or more skilled than other workers, or because of a shortage of excellent CEO candidates. This escalation of CEO compensation and of executive compensation more generally has fueled the growth of top 1% and top 0.1% incomes, leaving fewer of the gains of economic growth for ordinary workers and widening the gap between very high earners and the bottom 90%. The economy would suffer no harm if CEOs were paid less (or were taxed more).
How we can solve the problem: We need to enact policy solutions that would both reduce incentives for CEOs to extract economic concessions and limit their ability to do so. Such policies could include reinstating higher marginal income tax rates at the very top; setting corporate tax rates higher for firms that have higher ratios of CEO-to-worker compensation; using antitrust enforcement and regulation to restrain the excessive market power of firms—and by extension of CEOs; and allowing greater use of “say on pay,” which allows a firm’s shareholders to vote on top executives’ compensation.
https://www.epi.org/publication/ceo-pay-in-2021/
What this report finds: Corporate boards running America’s largest public firms are giving top executives outsize compensation packages that have grown much faster than the stock market and the pay of typical workers, college graduates, and even the top 0.1%. In 2021, we project that a CEO at one of the top 350 firms in the U.S. was paid $27.8 million on average (using a “realized” measure of CEO pay that counts stock awards when vested and stock options when cashed in and ownership is taken). This 11.1% increase from 2020 occurred because of rapid growth in vested stock awards. Using a different “granted” measure of CEO pay (which counts the value of stock awards and options when announced (or “granted” rather than realized), average top CEO compensation was $15.6 million in 2021, up 9.8% since 2020. In 2021, the ratio of CEO-to-typical-worker compensation was 399-to-1 under the realized measure of CEO pay; that is up from 366-to-1 in 2020 and a big increase from 20-to-1 in 1965 and 59-to-1 in 1989. CEOs are even making a lot more than other very high earners (wage earners in the top 0.1%)—almost seven times as much. From 1978 to 2021, CEO pay based on realized compensation grew by 1,460%, far outstripping S&P stock market growth (1,063%) and top 0.1% earnings growth (which was 385% between 1978 and 2020, according to the latest data available). In contrast, compensation of the typical worker grew by just 18.1% from 1978 to 2021.
Why it matters: Exorbitant CEO pay is a contributor to rising inequality that we could restrain without doing any damage to the wider economy. CEOs are getting ever-higher pay over time because of their power to set pay and because so much of their pay (more than 80%) is stock-related. They are not getting higher pay because they are becoming more productive or more skilled than other workers, or because of a shortage of excellent CEO candidates. This escalation of CEO compensation and of executive compensation more generally has fueled the growth of top 1% and top 0.1% incomes, leaving fewer of the gains of economic growth for ordinary workers and widening the gap between very high earners and the bottom 90%. The economy would suffer no harm if CEOs were paid less (or were taxed more).
How we can solve the problem: We need to enact policy solutions that would both reduce incentives for CEOs to extract economic concessions and limit their ability to do so. Such policies could include reinstating higher marginal income tax rates at the very top; setting corporate tax rates higher for firms that have higher ratios of CEO-to-worker compensation; using antitrust enforcement and regulation to restrain the excessive market power of firms—and by extension of CEOs; and allowing greater use of “say on pay,” which allows a firm’s shareholders to vote on top executives’ compensation.
https://www.epi.org/publication/ceo-pay-in-2021/
....
More info @ source. This report is too long to post in its entirety.
Wealth and wage inequality being a hot topic in this day and age, here we have a few additional statistics in an effort to put things into perspective. CEO's having the power to set their own salaries and pay scaling has been one neglected topic over the years. As has perhaps the topic of "golden parachutes". Incentive packages CEOs are eligible to receive if they're replaced or fired before their employment contract reaches its conclusion. I think that the majority of people have not had much real world exposure to the topic of CEOs until the recent Elon Musk vs Parag Agrawal twitter beef and the recent FTX incident with Sam BankmanFried. Both incidents could possibly give a person a greater education on CEOs than any textbook or college course.
It used to be very common for small business owners to label themselves "CEOs". I remember entrepreneurs owning a business where they were the only employee saying they were a CEO. That practice appears to be on a decline. It has been a long time since I have seen anyone do it. Is it possible that the public image of CEOs is on a decline?
Jump to: