Thanks for taking an action about this user and also thanks for the offer, but sorry I can't accept it because I didn't do this for money.
I just want to make this forum better from abusers, cheaters and scammers.
Topic: chaser15 abusing the rules of campaign (Read 503 times)
In fact, you are lucky that @Carollzinha hasn't tagged you. They are supposed to do so because you have been cheating them.
I do understand your point here mate but I dont see any reason to red tag him, specially when he could understand that what he did was wrong and, as was pointed above, his quality is good, he was even in our top 5 best posters a few times in the past months.About the next campaign he will join, lets hope he will learn from his mistakes and dont do such thing again. It would be sad for the community to loose such a good poster
On the part of the early quoting, if others believed that it was a heavy violation, I will gladly accept any negative trust to satisfy those who like me to have it. I will accept that I can't join any signature campaign from now on (since I will have now red-tagged) and I hope that will settle everything for everyone's peace. I will still continue posting here and won't make trash post.
It's good to know you accept that what you did was wrong. It's dishonest behavior. On the side of the company paying you, you have been cheating them. If you can't make enough posts in a week, then chill out, it's not a must that you should make all the posts every week.In fact, you are lucky that @Carollzinha hasn't tagged you. They are supposed to do so because you have been cheating them.
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1981
Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse
On the part of the early quoting, if others believed that it was a heavy violation, I will gladly accept any negative trust to satisfy those who like me to have it. I will accept that I can't join any signature campaign from now on (since I will have now red-tagged) and I hope that will settle everything for everyone's peace. I will still continue posting here and won't make trash post.
It's a cheating, chaser15. I used to trust you. I haven’t expected something like this from you. I knew you as a good quality poster in the gambling section. If you are making post in few days, no campaign would allow you to enroll I think.
Thank you for your report @Solosanz. The team checked things out & could confirm your report.
Chaser15 was kicked from the campaign permanently.
If you dont mind, drop me a private message with your Stake username and I will send you a bonus the next Tuesday for all the effort you put in creating this thread & showing us the things that were happening in our back.
Anyone from the community that has a valid report (with proofs) feel free to send me a private message here on forum or in Telegram. I can assure you that we will be more than happy to check it out & send you a bonus.
Best Regards,
Carollzinha
Chaser15 was kicked from the campaign permanently.
If you dont mind, drop me a private message with your Stake username and I will send you a bonus the next Tuesday for all the effort you put in creating this thread & showing us the things that were happening in our back.
Anyone from the community that has a valid report (with proofs) feel free to send me a private message here on forum or in Telegram. I can assure you that we will be more than happy to check it out & send you a bonus.
Best Regards,
Carollzinha
Ms. Caroll and her checking team are so strict when it comes to checking post quality that's why calling me abusing the campaign is too much. I respect Ms. Caroll as we already had a series of nice chats already even shared her views with me about how the team handles the campaign in general.
If they see my post is trash, I won't get any payment on that post. I don't know if my post quality is good but I believed it's not trash as I'm really quite knowledgeable on those topics I'm responding to, especially on the Gambling section that's why I paid. Everyone can refer to my post history and check it for yourselves.
On the part of the early quoting, if others believed that it was a heavy violation, I will gladly accept any negative trust to satisfy those who like me to have it. I will accept that I can't join any signature campaign from now on (since I will have now red-tagged) and I hope that will settle everything for everyone's peace. I will still continue posting here and won't make trash post.
This will be my only statement here. I will just wait for Ms. Caroll for her decision.
If they see my post is trash, I won't get any payment on that post. I don't know if my post quality is good but I believed it's not trash as I'm really quite knowledgeable on those topics I'm responding to, especially on the Gambling section that's why I paid. Everyone can refer to my post history and check it for yourselves.
On the part of the early quoting, if others believed that it was a heavy violation, I will gladly accept any negative trust to satisfy those who like me to have it. I will accept that I can't join any signature campaign from now on (since I will have now red-tagged) and I hope that will settle everything for everyone's peace. I will still continue posting here and won't make trash post.
This will be my only statement here. I will just wait for Ms. Caroll for her decision.
I would suggest that the user selects the posts that are most interesting for him to respond to and then replies to them. This, of course, looks very ugly, as it can give the impression that he makes posts within a few seconds. The manager might have noticed this himself by looking at history. It's impossible to reply at that speed. But since there is editing, I can assume that the posts are selected on a mobile phone, and subsequently, they are replied to on a more convenient device. Being far from home and being at work, it is not always convenient to be present at the forum. I don't see a big problem here.
I'm not sure how inconvenient it is for some users writing from a mobile device, but I use my mobile device to write on the forum 98% of the time, and the user in question writing the post the next day after quoting to manipulate time doesn't sound like someone who's far away from home; at the very least, someone far away from home or desktop could have written those posts after a few hours and not the next day..This user is attempting to avoid bursposting by cheating, but how can someone quote 9 posts in under five minutes? https://archive.ph/TE0YD
Not a big issue, but if this continues and newbies begin to adopt it, the forum will face greater difficulties.
This is a red tag + kick out offense
It's not correct to use red tag on this case since he's not a scammer or likely want to scam anyone, it's about unethical/morale of this user. Leaving neutral tag as a warning to any campaign manager is correct. I will keep this user on watch.
I would suggest that the user selects the posts that are most interesting for him to respond to and then replies to them. This, of course, looks very ugly, as it can give the impression that he makes posts within a few seconds. The manager might have noticed this himself by looking at history. It's impossible to reply at that speed. But since there is editing, I can assume that the posts are selected on a mobile phone, and subsequently, they are replied to on a more convenient device. Being far from home and being at work, it is not always convenient to be present at the forum. I don't see a big problem here.
This is a red tag + kick out offense
It's not correct to use red tag on this case since he's not a scammer or likely want to scam anyone, it's about unethical/morale of this user. Leaving neutral tag as a warning to any campaign manager is correct. Don't you have other things to do with your life instead of wasting it spying on other profiles? 
Because no one had reported this user, if someone ever report before, I wouldn't creating this thread. 
It's not my type to comment on these kind of topics but first of all... why do you even care what a user is doing with his account? He can spam d&*k pics everywhere and for sure he will be warned or even banned. Don't you have other things to do with your life instead of wasting it spying on other profiles?
If he hadn't found it, no one would have done it perhaps, and the user could have continued to abuse the signature campaigns for a long time.
Such behavior is not really helpful for the community's environment.
About this case, I find this complete nonsense and it is of course completely unacceptable, especially from an old member who joined years ago.
The minimum is to be fired from the campaign. As for a tag, a neutral may seem less rude and I thought so too, but it is still a cheat. Abusing a member or a signature campaign is the same thing. If he does it with campaigns he can do it with a member
It's not my type to comment on these kind of topics but first of all... why do you even care what a user is doing with his account? He can spam d&*k pics everywhere and for sure he will be warned or even banned. Don't you have other things to do with your life instead of wasting it spying on other profiles?
I've seen cases like that, I forget where the topic is, but I assume there are two account options for posting like that.
1. Account hacked and
2. Account for sale.
From data: https://bpip.org/Profile?p=chaser15, and his trust was once he was hacked and managed to recover.
For that, is there a possibility that the @chaser15 account will be sold again after being restored, that's the question....! If you look at the initial post, when it was hacked and now it's different, but I can't prove that, just my assumption in this matter.
Which is definitely a suggestion from @JeromeTash, for now, I agree.
1. Account hacked and
2. Account for sale.
From data: https://bpip.org/Profile?p=chaser15, and his trust was once he was hacked and managed to recover.
For that, is there a possibility that the @chaser15 account will be sold again after being restored, that's the question....! If you look at the initial post, when it was hacked and now it's different, but I can't prove that, just my assumption in this matter.
Which is definitely a suggestion from @JeromeTash, for now, I agree.
Since it's all about trying to meet the minimum post requirement. I think you should report this case to the campaign manager so that they can decide on what to do.
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1981
Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse
Damn, he was once a participant in one of my campaigns and I have never imagined of such thing. Don't know if he did this or not at that time but this is really stupid activity in my opinion. If he can't be active according to the campaign rules, he shouldn’t be in the campaign.
I will wait for his response before taking an action.
I will wait for his response before taking an action.
Since it's all about trying to meet the minimum post requirement. I think you should report this case to the campaign manager so that they can decide on what to do.
He will most likely get kicked out. Obviously it's unethical behavior but i don't think members will send him any red tags. Worst case will probably be a neutral tag with a warning.
I went through his posts history and almost all of the quoted posts were edited the next day, which is an act of cheating and spamming, and a user with such behavior cannot be trusted. He has been cheating to earn money from the subscription campaign.He will most likely get kicked out. Obviously it's unethical behavior but i don't think members will send him any red tags. Worst case will probably be a neutral tag with a warning.
This is a red tag + kick out offense, but I'd like to hear what other DT members have to say about it. I'll tag Carollzinha in this thread and see what he has to say.
Since it's all about trying to meet the minimum post requirement. I think you should report this case to the campaign manager so that they can decide on what to do.
He will most likely get kicked out. Obviously it's unethical behavior but i don't think members will send him any red tags. Worst case will probably be a neutral tag with a warning.
He will most likely get kicked out. Obviously it's unethical behavior but i don't think members will send him any red tags. Worst case will probably be a neutral tag with a warning.
User : chaser15
This user was quoting other user post without adding anything, firstly I thought it was a mistake since I've seen some users similar like that, then after few minutes/hours he will updated his post. But this case was different, he intentionally doing it on his 8 posts based on my archive version and edited his post in the next day, if you look at ninjastic.space you will see many more posts he did it. The reason why he did this because he want fulfill his campaign quota of minimum 25 posts/week and be active at least 5 days a week.
Although he didn't breaking any of forum rules, but he literally abusing the campaign rules in order to earn money. What do you think the penalty of this kind user? Does got kicked from the campaign is already enough? Let's share your opinion with this issues, I think we shouldn't have kind of this user in signature campaign paid in Bitcoin since it's only for active users, high quality and not an abusers.
Below is the example of his post
His post on April 17, 2022, 11:52:33 PM
Also his post after edited on April 18, 2022, 03:52:14 AM
Not a truly amazing performance by the Boston Celtics as they were unable to prevent the Nets' rally especially stopping Kyrie Irving. They almost lose that game after blowing a good lead. Nets almost win the game but got spoiled because of Jayson Tatum's quick drive to the hoop. If the scenario will be, the Nets will have the big lead, Celtics will have a hard time bouncing back.
Hope they learned something about that game. I'm sure next game an all-eyes of defense will be focused on Kyrie Irving as Tatum did a good job defending Kevin Durant limiting only its points to below 25 points.
This user was quoting other user post without adding anything, firstly I thought it was a mistake since I've seen some users similar like that, then after few minutes/hours he will updated his post. But this case was different, he intentionally doing it on his 8 posts based on my archive version and edited his post in the next day, if you look at ninjastic.space you will see many more posts he did it. The reason why he did this because he want fulfill his campaign quota of minimum 25 posts/week and be active at least 5 days a week.
Although he didn't breaking any of forum rules, but he literally abusing the campaign rules in order to earn money. What do you think the penalty of this kind user? Does got kicked from the campaign is already enough? Let's share your opinion with this issues, I think we shouldn't have kind of this user in signature campaign paid in Bitcoin since it's only for active users, high quality and not an abusers.
RULES
♦️ Must make at least 25 quality posts per week
♦️ You must be an active forum user in daily basis (or at least 5 days a week)
♦️ Must make at least 25 quality posts per week
♦️ You must be an active forum user in daily basis (or at least 5 days a week)
Below is the example of his post
His post on April 17, 2022, 11:52:33 PM
I was totally delighted with the first game of the Boston Celtics - Brooklyn Nets series. Thanks to a last second point for Celtics, they managed to win this game by only a one-point difference, 115-114. I admired the performance of each team here and they equally deserved a victory undoubtedly. And there was like a scoring duel between Jayson Tatum and Kyrie Irving here as well. Irving was the winner of this duel as he got 39 points and Tatum got 31. Celtics lead the series by 1-0 but I feel a great competition in this matchup already now. The side to advance to next stage would win this series by 4-3 I think.
Also his post after edited on April 18, 2022, 03:52:14 AM
I was totally delighted with the first game of the Boston Celtics - Brooklyn Nets series. Thanks to a last second point for Celtics, they managed to win this game by only a one-point difference, 115-114. I admired the performance of each team here and they equally deserved a victory undoubtedly. And there was like a scoring duel between Jayson Tatum and Kyrie Irving here as well. Irving was the winner of this duel as he got 39 points and Tatum got 31. Celtics lead the series by 1-0 but I feel a great competition in this matchup already now. The side to advance to next stage would win this series by 4-3 I think.
Not a truly amazing performance by the Boston Celtics as they were unable to prevent the Nets' rally especially stopping Kyrie Irving. They almost lose that game after blowing a good lead. Nets almost win the game but got spoiled because of Jayson Tatum's quick drive to the hoop. If the scenario will be, the Nets will have the big lead, Celtics will have a hard time bouncing back.
Hope they learned something about that game. I'm sure next game an all-eyes of defense will be focused on Kyrie Irving as Tatum did a good job defending Kevin Durant limiting only its points to below 25 points.
Jump to: