You are saying "not a scam" because you received the tokens.
On the other side, peoples are saying "scam" because they didn't receive the tokens, including myself.
My point is very clear, they could have mentioned at the beginning of bounty campaign that bounty hunters need KYC, but not after completing the ICO successfully.
Cibus or other ICOs does this thing intentionally I think to cheat bounty hunters and to grab those tokens to feed their greed. This proves dishonesty and they are no way legit.
I call this Technical Scam because in this way you will not be accused. You have a say that the bounty hunters refused to do KYC and that's the reason they didn't receive the tokens.
In recent time, I saw another ICO (FianciaCoin) with the same issue. No sorry, Fiancia is ahead of Cibus because they are forcing bounty hunters to buy tokens along with KYC.
I earned 1100 cbt = 1.1 eth and if 100 peoples earned like me....
So if only 100 peoples abandoned the bounty tokens like me then its 110 eth = $55000 easy money for the founder.
I hope you can understand what I'm trying to explain.
edit: the second issue was to upload personal docs to the online cloud.