Topic: Ciphrex's mSigna ver 0.8.12 beta (Read 2146 times)
Hmm, I will try it out and write up a small review if you would like?
I've been using this wallet for a week and I'm very pleased with the overall performance.
There is one additional shortcoming to point out. You cannot sign or verify messages using your wallet's addresses.
There is one additional shortcoming to point out. You cannot sign or verify messages using your wallet's addresses.
The non-ability to sign messages is kind of a deal breaker for me. Hopefully the developer will add this in the future.
I've been using this wallet for a week and I'm very pleased with the overall performance.
There is one additional shortcoming to point out. You cannot sign or verify messages using your wallet's addresses.
There is one additional shortcoming to point out. You cannot sign or verify messages using your wallet's addresses.
Think I will at least build it and give it a shot. I agree with OP that inability to import private keys may be a small drawback, but I would at least like to test and then draw a conclusion.
im interested in this client, need more opinions please
After some testing of both Armory and mSigna I have decided to implement the latter and move from Multibit to mSigna.
There doesn't seem to be much information about mSIGNA here in the alternative clients section of the form. I was wondering if somebody is currently using this program and would like to share their experience.
The 2 main drawbacks I see regarding mSIGNA is lack of online documentation and the apparent inability to import private keys. The program seems to work exclusively with BIP32 keychains.
2 strong points for mSIGNA: very fast to load and the possibility to use either your local copy of the blockchain or to connect to any accessible full node. The former was definitely a decisive point over Armory which takes quite some time to load and get online.
There doesn't seem to be much information about mSIGNA here in the alternative clients section of the form. I was wondering if somebody is currently using this program and would like to share their experience.
The 2 main drawbacks I see regarding mSIGNA is lack of online documentation and the apparent inability to import private keys. The program seems to work exclusively with BIP32 keychains.
2 strong points for mSIGNA: very fast to load and the possibility to use either your local copy of the blockchain or to connect to any accessible full node. The former was definitely a decisive point over Armory which takes quite some time to load and get online.
Jump to: