he doesnt even work in the department that does the vaccine.. so he is not a specialist
its like asking the bimbo models that sit on cars at car shows. yes they are paid by the car manufacturer but they have no clue about the mechanics of the car.
he is sceptical of the science of the data. he says he is amazed they got the data in such a short time.
whats next go into a high school and ask a french teacher about chemistry. and argue 'but you work for a school that teaches chemistry' to try proving a point that chemistry is fake, doesnt exist, dangerous, not taught... um sorry thats not how the world works
its been a known fact that instead of doing
w01:mice jab(initial 3 weeks)
w02-w03:
w04:review results(two months from 4th week)
w05-10:
w11:mice jab(3 months)
w12-22:
w23:review results(two months)
w24-31:
w32: start human testing
...
instead they done
w01:mice jab(initial 3 weeks) -
w02:review results(one month from week2)
w03-05:
w06:mice jab(3 months)
w07:review results(three months from week7)
w08-w20
w21:start human testing
..
instead of collecting data about week 1, week2 week3 results and then twiddle thumbs, they instead collected week 1 results and reviewed week 1 results during week2.. they then got week2 results and reviewed it in week3. they then got week3 results and reviewed it in week4. they then re-reviewed all data in week 5 and came to a conclusion about the first 3 week test. and then moved to next phase on week 6
its called concurrent test and review.. rather then consecutive test then review
just because you found a video where a guy not involved in the vaccine testing admits he doesnt know about the vaccine test process.. does not mean the real info is not available.
how about spend some time learning how the process works and not find uninvolved people to tell you how they dont know how the thing works
its like asking the bimbo models that sit on cars at car shows. yes they are paid by the car manufacturer but they have no clue about the mechanics of the car.
he is sceptical of the science of the data. he says he is amazed they got the data in such a short time.
whats next go into a high school and ask a french teacher about chemistry. and argue 'but you work for a school that teaches chemistry' to try proving a point that chemistry is fake, doesnt exist, dangerous, not taught... um sorry thats not how the world works
its been a known fact that instead of doing
w01:mice jab(initial 3 weeks)
w02-w03:
w04:review results(two months from 4th week)
w05-10:
w11:mice jab(3 months)
w12-22:
w23:review results(two months)
w24-31:
w32: start human testing
...
instead they done
w01:mice jab(initial 3 weeks) -
w02:review results(one month from week2)
w03-05:
w06:mice jab(3 months)
w07:review results(three months from week7)
w08-w20
w21:start human testing
..
instead of collecting data about week 1, week2 week3 results and then twiddle thumbs, they instead collected week 1 results and reviewed week 1 results during week2.. they then got week2 results and reviewed it in week3. they then got week3 results and reviewed it in week4. they then re-reviewed all data in week 5 and came to a conclusion about the first 3 week test. and then moved to next phase on week 6
its called concurrent test and review.. rather then consecutive test then review
just because you found a video where a guy not involved in the vaccine testing admits he doesnt know about the vaccine test process.. does not mean the real info is not available.
how about spend some time learning how the process works and not find uninvolved people to tell you how they dont know how the thing works
He is just a sales person or marketer for Pfizer but have you seen the other videos that Project Veritas has released of real people that are either scientists or doctors that are skeptical about the vaccine?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obdI7tgKLtA&t
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNIj83XNNeE&t
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=On5RYFbcxWY&t
