Topic: Claim to the moderator of the Russian section of Xal0lex (Read 717 times)

I don't read every post on the Russian board and I don't recall reading anything about this issue until you created this thread. I still don't get how making this about me is helping your case but whatever.

I wrote this because you pretended that my topic was news for you, although you read it in the Russian version, but you pretend that you did not see my arguments and I have to voice them here again so that you do not mislead people. I know this trick of yours and I will remind people about it every time you try to use it.

My post did not violate the rules and we are not in the ChipMixer's campaign to evaluate posts by the number of letters. The moderator has no right to delete a post expressing the opinion of a person. If he has not learned in 3 years to distinguish trolling from opinion, then such a moderator should not be a moderator.

It's still a useless post in that thread. If I said "there are all sorts of clowns here" in this thread or any thread that doesn't directly deal with clowns (real or idiomatic) I would expect my post to be deleted too.


It's a non sequitur at best. It makes no difference if the OP is a scammer or not - the moderator should not base their decision on that.


And here we go again, vague accusations just because I disagreed with you. Come on, spit it out, what is it? Is Xal0lex my alt?

In connection with the peculiarities of Russian idioms and informal speech, particularly mediocre scammers are called "clowns", and if Xal0lex does not know Russian language well, this is his problem.

A similar proposal was already discussed, but there was a smaller amount of money. In that topic, my comment described  the content of the topic most accurately. It’s not my problem that Xal0lex does not know that it is legal to have one-time cash worth one billion rubles in Russia - not a single bank will issue such an amount, even if it belongs to you by law.


Inaccurate translation. Correct approximate translation:
Not true, the following message was with a personal explanation for Xal0lex (note, I didn’t even ask who was deleting, I immediately understood whose hands did it):http://archive.md/wip/K5zTV
After his appearance as a moderator in the Russian local area, fraudulent topics that have nothing to do with the blockchain, for example, offers to participate in carding on localbitcoins, ceased to be deleted because... offtop fraud is not moderated! and there is no obstacle to littering the forum with such garbage. He also began to remove fraud warnings, as in my case.

enough for now

Two deleted posts:

1) You calling someone a clown.
2) You complaining when the "clown" post was deleted.

I don't see how that indicates any wrongdoing on the part of the moderator unless the thread is about clowns, which it isn't.

It seems that your intent was to point out a scam. If you just said "this service/product looks like a scam because " then your post would have a better chance. And if fact there are such posts in that thread.

Obviously I have no knowledge of this situation, as I am not a Russian speaker. I would like to make some general comments on moderation though.

Moderators hold the future of the forum in their hands, and it is a big responsibility. They will become unpopular, and this is why many have to remain anonymous. Keeping a forum free of spam, and undesirable posts is a monumental task. However, the deletion of threads and post, or the moving of them to boards that are less desirable in the view of the poster, can be destructive and damaging to the forum. I walked from the mining board because I felt that the moderation there was designed to maintain a small clique of posters, and was not aimed at encouraging members who may be new to mining. I have had projects killed by a moderator, and I am now reluctant to start any new ones. I have seen many comments about similar experiences. What is evident is that the forum has changed, and many good members no longer contribute.

My suggestion is that a moderator reviewer is appointed, and that any post or topic by a Full Member or above is checked by this reviewer, and a moderator who may not be acting in the best interests of the forum or a board is given some guidance. I no longer bother to complain about what I consider to be bad moderation of my posts, as I feel that these complaints don't help the forum. However, it is certain that the forum is losing a many good posts by members as a result of bad moderation. This is not just the posts of the members, but as a result of these members reducing their contributions.

Claim to the moderator of the Russian section of Xal0lex

This person became a moderator after spending only a year on the forum and for 2 years of moderation he did not learn how to distinguish between informative and shit posts. I periodically experience the results of his activities on myself. In the Russian section, I have repeatedly pointed out to him the unreasonable deletion of my posts, the time has come to leave a review here.

My opinion is that Xal0lex deletes posts when he does not understand what is written. And given his little experience in the field of blockchain technology, trading and a short stay on the forum, he often does not understand much. After removing a post by him, I have to write a new one with additional explanations personally for him, so that he understands what has been written and does not delete it and this is annoying.

Upon making claims against him, he does not acknowledge that he is not right and begins to unreasonably refer to the rules in order to avoid being convicted of poor-quality moderation. His most odious justification for removing a post was yesterday, "fraud is not moderated," although it was a post, not a report.
links to discussion on the rus local one --- two --- three

He was also explained to him that he did not understand the special status of the moderator and the need for careful selection, when publishing by him topics of announcements of services that could jeopardize the loss of finances.

This topic is the next step in indicating the shortcomings of this moderator, in addition to the previous steps made in the Russian section.