I have recently come accross this address:
1Q7CLPAV6Xu1MkqiYdmKBNPrZPU9bZSBHX
which HAD a positive Bitcoin balance on 12.05.2014 (a date of Clams distribution) but nevertheless has NOT been awarded Clams on the initial distribution. Digging deeper I checked Just-Dice.com webpage and tried the /dig command and they gave me their standard response for a new address:
Quote
INFO: BTC address [1Q7CLPAV] was not funded on 12th May 2014; [xXQqEFzx] is the corresponding CLAM address; see [history:1Q7CLPAV] for a history of its balance
If you check those links, you would see that the history link shows that the address HAD a positive balance, so why would they choose to declare the address HAD BEEN EMPTY (in line with the fact the address HAD NOT BEEN awarded Clams)? Do they still have the same bug that the software for initial Clams distribution had? Or am I missing something?