Author

Topic: Clinton Demands Obama Start World War with Russia to Defend Moderate Terrorists (Read 630 times)

hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
How deluded can you be? The only way that this could benefit the US if they actually end up being the only winner. History has taught us that this is very unlikely and that the end result is going to be catastrophic. Oh yeah, I should not even start talking about the side effects once people start launching nukes like it is a FPS game. If this actually does happen then the effects of it are going to be catastrophic.

Yeah well, history should also have taught us that assuming that mentally unstable people will always act in a sane manner can have disastrous consequences. For example most sane people probably hoped and believed against all hope to the last day that nutcases Bush and Blair wouldn´t be crazy enough to invade Iraq.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 1000
USA never understand these modern day Islamic terrorists. Their real problem is capitalism and its leader USA. They wanna live in middle age like fighting and etc.
legendary
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1217
A democrat wanting war? I though they were antiwar  Roll Eyes

Both the Democrats, as well as the Republicans have their own anti-war and pro-war factions. The anti-war faction in the Democrat party is dominated by Barack Obama. The pro-war camp includes Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden. Similarly, in the republican party, Marco Rubio, John McCain.etc are the warmongers, while Rand Paul, Donald Trump.etc are pacifist.
legendary
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359
A democrat wanting war? I though they were antiwar  Roll Eyes
Yeah, of course they were antiwar in Serbia.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
She would be toast. No military officer would accept her if the shit hit the fan. Or that monkey playing army general.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
I believe Putin will make a preventive strike against the US to save the rest of the world and bring back peace on Earth.
Exactly how is that beneficial to anyone? Do you think that the US would respond to a strike by doing nothing? I highly doubt that.

Sounds funny. Once upon a time USA politicians talk about they protect us from terrorists.
Now they protect everyone including terrorists from Russia? Such bad move.
They're just fueling the average Joe with nonsense and he is going to buy. Thus the average Joe remains supportive of his government's decision.
legendary
Activity: 2310
Merit: 1028
Sounds funny. Once upon a time USA politicians talk about they protect us from terrorists.
Now they protect everyone including terrorists from Russia? Such bad move.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
A democrat wanting war? I though they were antiwar  Roll Eyes
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
World War 3 will start at the moment Pinocchibitch is elected to the post of POTUS in 2016 (as of now, almost confirmed). First she will start with Iran, and then will follow it with an invasion of Venezuela. If the USAF is still intact, DPRK will be the next in the line. If United States exists after all this, then she will wage the crusade against Russia.

I believe Putin will make a preventive strike against the US to save the rest of the world and bring back peace on Earth.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
How deluded can you be? The only way that this could benefit the US if they actually end up being the only winner. History has taught us that this is very unlikely and that the end result is going to be catastrophic. Oh yeah, I should not even start talking about the side effects once people start launching nukes like it is a FPS game. If this actually does happen then the effects of it are going to be catastrophic.
legendary
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1217
World War 3 will start at the moment Pinocchibitch is elected to the post of POTUS in 2016 (as of now, almost confirmed). First she will start with Iran, and then will follow it with an invasion of Venezuela. If the USAF is still intact, DPRK will be the next in the line. If United States exists after all this, then she will wage the crusade against Russia.
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1014
Quote
Training and arming terrorists is not cheap, and the US government has an obligation to stop Russia from blowing up all of its terrorists, says Hillary Clinton.

Bloomberg News:

Hillary Clinton took a big step away from President Obama’s foreign policy at Tuesday night’s debate, challenging him to resist Russia’s intervention in the Syrian war. She also recast her call for a Syrian no-fly zone, saying it is needed to fight President Vladimir Putin’s aggression.

“We have to stand up to his bullying, and specifically in Syria, it is important,” Clinton said. “I think it’s important too that the United States make it very clear to Putin that it’s not acceptable for him to be in Syria creating more chaos, bombing people on behalf of Assad, and we can’t do that if we don’t take more of a leadership position, which is what I’m advocating.”

Is a world war with Russia popular with the voter democratic base, I wonder? I mean, is this woman literally campaigning on starting a world war to protect terrorists?

Seriously, what dimension am I in?
http://www.dailystormer.com/clinton-bloomberg-demand-obama-start-world-war-with-russia-to-defend-moderate-terrorists/
Jump to: