Author

Topic: [CLOSED] Get $1 of bitcoin easy - Looking for 3 people to review a video (Read 491 times)

sr. member
Activity: 325
Merit: 250
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Go figure! | I'm nearing 1337 posts...
Personally, I liked the second one a lot more. The background music is more intense, which to me is more fitting to the similarly-intense content of the video. The first one just has some kind of music that relaxes me; which doesn't seem very fitting at all to me. It starts out with some violin music!

I watched it on a basic-issue Samsung headphone set.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
1. I watched video by opening it in youtube brower on chrome. No default settings of the youtube site modified. Heard using stereo headphone.

2. Both videos have clear audio.

3. With slight modifications both tried to reveal the ideal content.

4. On a visual perception, the voice cuts its edges with the motion pictures in the first video better than the second one.

5. My preference is first video than the second. My suggestion is to reduce 2 minutes from 7.30 minute video if possible.

Good luck
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1032
RIP Mommy
I prefer the second, due to the soundtrack. The 1st's soundtrack opens pretty harshly, the kind of TV infomercial I immediately shut off. But then the rest of the 1st's soundtrack is rather boring/subdued. The 2nd's soundtrack makes me want to listen to the script.

Imagery, no opinion, as I get lost in the script.

Voiceover itself is average on both. A bit more gravitas on the 2nd would provide good balance to its soundtrack. Conversely, a toned-down voiceover on the 1st would provide good balance to its soundtrack.

LG W1943 at 1360 x 768
99 cent headset earbuds
Same address as before.
sr. member
Activity: 325
Merit: 250
I've prefferd the first one, first point i see more correlation on images shown and sound (some how the image movement got me confortable with the sound being played), and also some parts got me in like a suspence atmosphere leading me for a information seeking sence.
I've watched it on a 1920x1080 screen, with 5.1 steelseries headset.

1 of 3 reward satisfied with Gultahin
sr. member
Activity: 325
Merit: 250
I've prefferd the first one, first point i see more correlation on images shown and sound (some how the image movement got me confortable with the sound being played), and also some parts got me in like a suspence atmosphere leading me for a information seeking sence.
I've watched it on a 1920x1080 screen, with 5.1 steelseries headset.

What's detrimental of video 2 in comparison?
sr. member
Activity: 325
Merit: 250
I don't see the big big difference of soundtrack, but i prefeer the second, because remember more the documentary soundtrack.
I have see with 1024x768 and the normal (and economic) sound speacker  Grin

can you elaborate just a little more?
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
۩۞۩ secondstrade.com ★
I've prefferd the first one, first point i see more correlation on images shown and sound (some how the image movement got me confortable with the sound being played), and also some parts got me in like a suspence atmosphere leading me for a information seeking sence.
I've watched it on a 1920x1080 screen, with 5.1 steelseries headset.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000
I don't see the big big difference of soundtrack, but i prefeer the second, because remember more the documentary soundtrack.
I have see with 1024x768 and the normal (and economic) sound speacker  Grin
sr. member
Activity: 325
Merit: 250
First 3 people to complete this task successfully get the $1 of bitcoin; just PM me your address

TASK: Watch these two videos and explain which one is better and why. The videos are the same except the soundtrack; which one is better? - Also tell me the size of your screen you watched on and type of speakers used

VIDEO 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4F8zVmq4U4

VIDEO 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kl4D84YqTTY

They're 7min long

NO MORE ENTRIES
Jump to: