Topic: [CLOSED] Parsing bbcode (Read 389 times)
r
I think 70% of the members here seek a chance to get space in a signature or bounty campaign.
Making your bounty limited to a few participants may make most applicants feel disappointed.
It is appreciated if you can keep payments on average so that maximum number of members can join.
What you can advise on the basis of the fact that the company of generosity will be about $ 200,000Making your bounty limited to a few participants may make most applicants feel disappointed.
It is appreciated if you can keep payments on average so that maximum number of members can join.
If the average divided by $ 100 per participant, then this is 2000 people
May I ask, what kind of company? any further detail?
It is about advertising your company? or invest in your bounty company?
I assume, you want to advertise your company. 250-500 people are enough to advertise your company for months, instead of hire 2000 people which is could lead to so much spammer everywhere. However, you can discuss it with trusted manager in this forum, to calculate it.
But, you said the requirements will be high, what are the requirements?
we see and know how the current campaign situation. as a bounty hunter I strongly agree if campaign participants are made to be limited. his heavy rule it's okay, which is important we are serious in working, not the work like spammers.
I think it's good to put the participant to limited as you said. Getting too many participation doesn't really mean that bounty is getting published in good way. There could scammers in the campaign who may not do the job seriously and end up in spam.
Limiting the participation will also save the unwanted spreading of the tokens, if too much payment is given in the form of token then it might just loose the value in later time of ICO. This is the reason why we see those ICO failing who has airdrops going on. Becuase if the tokens are given away like that almost free then this has to be paid by the company above the heads.
So keep it limited. That would be better.
Limiting the participation will also save the unwanted spreading of the tokens, if too much payment is given in the form of token then it might just loose the value in later time of ICO. This is the reason why we see those ICO failing who has airdrops going on. Becuase if the tokens are given away like that almost free then this has to be paid by the company above the heads.
So keep it limited. That would be better.
I think 70% of the members here seek a chance to get space in a signature or bounty campaign.
Making your bounty limited to a few participants may make most applicants feel disappointed.
It is appreciated if you can keep payments on average so that maximum number of members can join.
Making your bounty limited to a few participants may make most applicants feel disappointed.
It is appreciated if you can keep payments on average so that maximum number of members can join.
re
Jump to: