I think some time pretty soon these guys are gonna discover that law is actually law. and the real law don't give a shit about how nice the code is if the law's being broken.
No single coin that is tied to any country (especially the US) should, and probably won't ever succeed long term - and rightfully so.
You can't have decentralization if a coin is a registered trademark or otherwise tied to a company and therefore depend on that countries laws. In fact, I'd personally go as far as saying that developers of any half decent coin should thrive to be completely anonymous from the beginning and stay that way. Just imagine what would happen if Satoshi would "appear" and we'd know it's him without a doubt...
Knowing the devs introduces politics and preferences to coins which are both unnecessary and opens up attack vectors.
Anyway, to be on topic, I think The DAO being a mistake was one thing (it was clearly an experimental project) but allowing a single smart contract to tie so much of Eth's supply was a terrible idea to begin with. But not as bad as bailing out an experimental project because it opened the floodgates - by which I mean the Eth team could fork again (and will do so eventually) if they don't agree with an ideology or a group of people or even you personally.
Code should be law. If code is not law then what are we doing here?