Topic: COIN says regulate but have a rulebook - can help run Business or we leave US! (Read 113 times)

COIN CEO can go where he wants to go, the US will remain strong and most crypto companies will stay and new ones will open. Meaning the US is too big to be threatened by this single entity, the hypocrisy of the CEO is high, some of them have branches elsewhere, it can be done by COIN also, not threatening. The US rules are spelt, the SEC and CFTC might both have jurisdiction in regulating a single digital asset depending on their usage as digital asset in terms of derivative and commodity classes. He should stop comparing the US that has the best regulatory plan to another country.

There has been some discussion about this on social media, and the majority of those who agree with Gensler more or less stated that the interpretation of the law change depending on who holds power. Basically, there is a certainty that any approval from SEC in the past years will hold up now since apparently if there is a new head, then the rules need to follow him. It's kinda wack if that's true, no business would risk dealing with them since it doesn't matter if they follow the law or not if they can get sued in the future due to breaking 'security laws' in the past.

Another aspect that I find confusing is how the SEC approved Coinbase's IPO two years ago, yet they seem to be giving them a hard time now. I believe Coinbase's business hasn't changed significantly within those two years, so it's quite puzzling.

Armstrong said "anything is on the table" in terms of the crypto exchange's plans should greater regulatory clarity not emerge in the U.S.

Coinbase (COIN) CEO Brian Armstrong indicated that the crypto exchange would consider moving away from the U.S. if the regulatory environment for the industry does not become clearer.
"Anything is on the table, including relocating or whatever is necessary" he said after former U.K. Chancellor George Osbourne asked whether he could see Coinbase leaving the U.S. at Fintech Week in London.
"I think the U.S. has the potential to be an important market for crypto, but right now we are not seeing that regulatory clarity that we need," he said. "I think in a number of years if we don't see that regulatory clarity emerge in the U.S. we may have to consider investing more elsewhere in the world."

Armstrong's comments come weeks after rival exchange Bittrex said it planned to exit the U.S. by the end of April, citing "the current U.S. regulatory and economic environment." Bittrex received a Wells Notice – a statement that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) Enforcement Division found evidence of legal violations – in March, general counsel David Maria told the Wall Street Journal. The SEC filed a lawsuit against the exchange on Monday.
Armstrong compared the U.K. situation, where there is only one regulator – the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) – responsible for both commodities and securities, with the U.S., where there are separate bodies: the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the SEC.
"You don't have this unfortunate thing happening where the CFTC and the SEC are having a turf battle," he said. "We actually have contradictory statements from the heads of the CFTC and the SEC coming out almost every few weeks. How's a business going to operate in that environment? We just want a clear rulebook."
Coinbase received a Wells Notice from the SEC in March. Armstrong said Coinbase had met with the SEC "30 times" without getting feedback regarding the nature of its business before receiving the notice.

He said there's a lack of distinction or nuance in how regulators view the different arms of the cryptocurrency industry. Exchanges like Coinbase should be regulated like financial services companies, whereas the decentralized areas of the industry should be handled very differently because there is no central authority to regulate.
"Things like Bitcoin, Ethereum, DeFi and even self-custodial wallets should be regulated like a software business or something like that," he said.

Coinbase Beyond Crypto
Armstrong also spoke of decentralized identity as one of the most compelling use cases for blockchain technology beyond cryptocurrency.
“Decentralized identity is a way for people to kind of have their own, information ... because they actually own it," Armstrong said.
“Decentralized social media is on the horizon. I think that's pretty important in terms of freedom of speech.”
Earlier this year, Coinbase unveiled Base, an Ethereum layer 2 network upon which developers can build decentralized apps (dapps), sending a signal it wants to go beyond the trading of digital assets and into developing and expanding the broader uses of blockchain technology.