If I may remind you, although it is on every participants duty to do their own DD, a CM and BM were still responsible to do their own DD to at least see how likely the project to be a rug pull, because their action of moderating the project implies their confidence for the said project and can be seen as a support toward the project.
With that out of the way and assuming your answer is, "yes, I do my DD" --because if you said otherwise, that you just randomly accept any project hiring you as their BM, we'll have a whole different situation and conversation here-- then how come you deemed project with these quality of whitepaper like below to have a likeliness, no matter how slight, to stay for a long term?
This is the one you raised on the accusation:
They have no clear date of roadmap, just "phase 1" and so on. How did this exactly shows a carefully planned and well thoroughly thought project? Their whitepaper is just 8 pages long and two of them were dedicated for cover --plus one for the obscure roadmap.
Another one of the whitepaper of the project which bounty you managed with similar situation:
Their entire whitepaper is just 9 pages long, with 2 pages allocated for front and back cover, and the other 7 serves basic and uninsightful content. And like CoinSale, their project hasno clear roadmap .
This one has a very trashy telegram group, with a questionable channel name --I even had to double check just to be sure I landed on the correct group-- and filled with spam bot.
So my question is --assuming you said that you've done your part to sort which project is an utter trash and which aren't-- how do you determine those project with such quality as something prospective? Or did you couldn't care less as long as you get paid?