Author

Topic: Cointelegraph on nems technical reference (Read 395 times)

hero member
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
May 19, 2015, 04:51:30 AM
#4

The Coin Herald Bugle is the least reputable cryptocurrency journal (pay-to-play)...
But the NEM Technical Reference is well done has been good for a 15% boost.

Problem is that this is Super-Geek circle jerk material...
It will be many months before an ordinary human being will find anything interesting on NEM.

Sorry, I like NEM and hope it takes off, but that's the current reality  Sad Sad Sad

I find it to be the least circle jerk thing i've seen in quite a bit.
It just states facts instead of promising this revolution or that innovation.

Anway I don't like the article much. There are clearly some missunderstandings. Makes me wonder how much technical background the editors at ct have.
full member
Activity: 237
Merit: 100

The Coin Herald Bugle is the least reputable cryptocurrency journal (pay-to-play)...
But the NEM Technical Reference is well done has been good for a 15% boost.

Problem is that this is Super-Geek circle jerk material...
It will be many months before an ordinary human being will find anything interesting on NEM.

Sorry, I like NEM and hope it takes off, but that's the current reality  Sad Sad Sad

Kinda sounds what's happening to crypto in general and not really specific to NEM.
legendary
Activity: 1588
Merit: 1000

The Coin Herald Bugle is the least reputable cryptocurrency journal (pay-to-play)...
But the NEM Technical Reference is well done has been good for a 15% boost.

Problem is that this is Super-Geek circle jerk material...
It will be many months before an ordinary human being will find anything interesting on NEM.

Sorry, I like NEM and hope it takes off, but that's the current reality  Sad Sad Sad
Jump to: